Is that image a joke?
Looks like a 5 minute SketchUp job, or a F-you by the architect!
Unlike the proposal at Dundas and Bloor, where the developers are engaging the community, this development sought to ram through a proposal. Now they have basically wasted a year of their time and a sizeable amount of money. I wonder if the developer is based in Toronto, or is just developing in Toronto for the money. If they had researched the neighbourhood, they could probably forecast the result. I don't have any confidence their 8-storey proposal will be any better.
Completely false. The ballet school is a tenant of the current building. The developer who has purchased the building has expressed an interest in keeping the ballet school in the new building, and is trying to use this as leverage to get the zoning amended.The developer is the dance studio.
Completely false. The ballet school is a tenant of the current building. The developer who has purchased the building has expressed an interest in keeping the ballet school in the new building, and is trying to use this as leverage to get the zoning amended.
Also, first, if you're referring to the Loblaw proposal, it is remarkably different than this one could ever be and, as such, requires a wholly different community engagement approach.
Second, whatever this proposal winds up ultimately being, the proponent will be required to undertake precisely the same development application and review process that every other development does, and there's no possible way to skirt it.
Third, every proponent in Toronto is developing for the money. That doesn't make it wrong or bad or worth fighting against.
The non-residential gross floor area and the live-work units have been replaced with townhouse units.
42