telefann
Active Member
Appreciate the effort at non-spandrel solid panelling but that dark charcoal grey could not be more soulless and dreadful.
Toronto 50 Eglinton West | 169.03m | 49s | Madison Group | AUDAX
- Thread starter urbandreamer
- Start date
ProjectEnd
Superstar
12 cabs for 844 units. Absolutely fantastic!
Northern Light
Superstar
Well...........too good to last PE.
Resubmission on this one.
@Paclo
12 cabs, 1,206 units, with newly proposed heights of 58s and 46s.
The elevator ratio, at least, isn't terrible.....
(note to Paclo, this one, above is at 50% resolution vs the file)
The remaining renders below are all at 100%
Attachments
Koops65
Senior Member
Northern Light
Superstar
For @Paclo new AIC link for this project:
www.toronto.ca
* link correct as per Paclo below.
Application Details
www.toronto.ca
* link correct as per Paclo below.
Last edited:
That link is for 567 Sheppard.
I got the correct link here though, thanks
Application Details
www.toronto.ca
Northern Light
Superstar
That link is for 567 Sheppard.
I got the correct link here though, thanks
Application Details
No idea how I managed that; weird.
I have corrected the link I posted. (no sense in leaving an inaccurate one)
Thanks.
It's not the elevator ratio isn't terrible now, it's that the elevator ratio is GOOD now. 1 elevator for every 100.5 units has to be applauded.
42
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Excuse me????????
Northern Light
Superstar
Fair, I merely noted that the situation is less desirable than it was when PE commented about 12 cabs to 844 units.
innsertnamehere
Superstar
12 cabs for 844 units is honestly probably overkill anyway.
Doppleganger
Active Member
When is Toronto going to up its game? Aside from a handful of outstanding examples, including 'The One and 'Forma', this city seems determined to become the posterchild for mediocrity.
Last edited:
The Preservationist
Active Member
I'm liking the contrast between the dark towers and light and not overly sized podium.
amh
Active Member
I wouldn't read into this as anything more than it is - a mislabeling of the unit type.
Using OBC floor area minimums, you cannot achieve a 3B in 663 sq ft.
A lot of developers are pushing for 610-620 sq ft 2B units in Toronto these days and it's not really workable. 650, yes. Below that is not ideal.
Last edited:
rbt
Senior Member
Fun fact, that size is perfectly doable in a tiny-home. I get to 562sqft not including closets or mechanical.
Building Code requirements | Build or buy a tiny home
Read our guide on what to look for when building or buying a tiny home for your property. Download PDF