ushahid
Senior Member
^i dont know if it's a coincident but quality and design has gone down since they changed their leadership.
I'm afraid it's going to end up looking a bit 210 Simcoe or worse, Daniels Waterfront. Maybe it's my taste, but I just don't find these cladding panel patterns to be very attractive. Having said that, I don't know what the alternatives are for a fully cladded facade.View attachment 308196
From the architectural plans filed in December it looks like they're going for some sort of dissolving pattern as the metal panels make their way up as well. I'm cautiously optimistic
I would say more like the Residences of RCMI, which I kinda like.I'm afraid it's going to end up looking a bit 210 Simcoe or worse, Daniels Waterfront. Maybe it's my taste, but I just don't find these cladding panel patterns to be very attractive. Having said that, I don't know what the alternatives are for a fully cladded facade.
What a messView attachment 308196
From the architectural plans filed in December it looks like they're going for some sort of dissolving pattern as the metal panels make their way up as well. I'm cautiously optimistic
Excuse me, any self respecting 3-year old would make much better designs than thisWhat a mess
Thank god that side is not very visible
Looks like something my 3 year old put together with Lego
Dude, you criticize even decent looking buildings, but then you like this grey on grey on grey motif lolKiller critique!
I do yes. Is / should the critique all be about 'grey'?Excuse me, any self respecting 3-year old would make much better designs than this
Dude, you criticize even decent looking buildings, but then you like this grey on grey on grey motif lol
I think the critique of colour, critique of style and critique of quality be should be kept mostly separated, IMO. Because they get it right in with the one thing, doesn't mean they get it right with the others. There are too many examples of that to be named.I do yes. Is / should the critique all be about 'grey'?