Hipster Duck
Senior Member
I would agree with an earlier comment that in some ways, holding onto certain heritage buildings is holding back the growth of the city. Cities like New York were initially built at a high enough density that their heritage districts meet the needs of the city. In Toronto, many heritage neighbourhoods currently house a fraction of the density that can be supported. If done carefully, I'd like to see most of the Bloor-College-Queen corridor, including side streets, gradually replaced with 8 story mid rises, and subway lines built on the latter two streets.
Exactly. While this is very controversial, this is exactly how urban cities evolve. It doesn't entail the leveling of entire areas and the rebuilding by a single developer, but the gradual teardown of properties over decades and their replacement with higher density, decidedly more metropolitan buildings. A good example of this is Yorkville Avenue; seemingly half of the street was torn down and replaced with new condos over the past 10 years. Yet, we hardly noticed its transition: the vibrancy and character of Yorkville avenue was retained and buildings like the Hazelton Hotel, 100 Yorkville, 18 Yorkville and Minto Yorkville seem to be as well integrated as anything else on the street.
Last edited: