stjames2queenwest
Senior Member
Barf
Barf
It's better than what exists today. I'm glad this developer has the balls to build in the worst corner of the city. However, I'm not a fan of the park/court
If you look at the pictures from their site it's not as bad: http://oneproperties.com/queen-sherbourne-retail/
While this is at LPAT, it appears the City has sorted out the heritage component. Confidential attachments from the last Council meeting were made public this week:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.CC44.6
Drawings available here:
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-118817.pdf
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-118816.pdf
I think those are old renderings - the floorplans on the link you posted still have the old "urban room" and is missing the shitty new parkette. But thanks for the link, hadn't seen that site yet.It's better than what exists today. I'm glad this developer has the balls to build in the worst corner of the city. However, I'm not a fan of the park/court
If you look at the pictures from their site it's not as bad: http://oneproperties.com/queen-sherbourne-retail/
The links on the site are definitely outdated but the pictures on the landing page are recent.Interesting to see the massing against the condo building at 320 Richmond Street East is less offensive than the previous renderings.
I think those are old renderings - the floorplans on the link you posted still have the old "urban room" and is missing the shitty new parkette. But thanks for the link, hadn't seen that site yet.
The links on the site are definitely outdated but the pictures on the landing page are recent.
The original plan is much better. The developer is not to blame here . It's the city by rejecting the original plan.
I disagree, the giant paper clips are kinda cool. But. That’s all.Not much to like here![]()