Toronto 2422 Islington Avenue | 40.3m | 11s | 2424355 Ontario Ltd | Studio JCI

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
36,050
Reaction score
105,454
Location
Toronto/EY
This new to the AIC proposal seeks to redevelop Elmhurst Plaza on Islington Avenue with an 11s midrise and 4s townhomes.

The site is ~8700m2 or about 94000ft2

First the link:


Streetview:


1660033172994.png


1660033263669.png


No Pretty renders w/this one, just massing-level drawings.

1660032168117.png


1660032271140.png

1660032308941.png



1660032338438.png


1660032945440.png


1660032389128.png


Comments:

While the residential intensification of this site is welcome, at first blush, it does not contain any retail, which seems inappropriate to me. While the community would not lose a grocery store, it would lose a bank branch, a pharmacy, at least 2 food-serving establishments (Tim's and a Pizza place) and neighbourhood services.

The preliminary design does mention the grade-level being designed not to preclude future retail; but that still seems wrong-headed to me.

Parking ratio seems a bit high for this site, greater than 1 space per unit. Sure it's the not the most walkable community, but again, adding retail rather than subtracting it would seem helpful here.

The height ask will get pushback. The nearest height precedent is 6s apartment across the street, so that is your given baseline. There is also a church on another corridor and openspace/hydro corridor on the last of the 4 corners of the principle intersection here.

That will help, but the plaza does directly abut SFH on both sides. The proposal seeks to address transition on the one side w/the use of the 4s townhomes, but lacks any material transition on the other. That may be reasonable in light of future intensification, but could still be an issue for the neighbours.

A modest set back of the upper floors here (above 6 along Islington) would probably soften this a great a deal.
 
Last edited:
I was just saying this plaza seemingly would never get replaced, glad to see some development happening. I am very disappointed there will be no retail though, I would look forward to waking here from my house close by.
 
In reading the Cover Letter, I find that this proposal has been revised largely in line with my comments in this thread. :)

1704817038358.png


The Revised Planning Report gives us the following:

1704817097405.png


Parking is still very high, though the ratio has declined a bit due to the bump in unit numbers.

@Paclo is flagged for the database updates.
 
This going forward will make the neighbourhood markedly less walkable and urban in nature. What an amazing planning regime we have that purges the only non residential use, containing seemingly two dozen business many of them obviously small in nature, from a neighbourhood.
1735288399446.png

Crazy, a 2.5 sqkm chunk of land smack dab in the middle of the largest metro area in the country will be devoid of any retail. If you thought Rexdale was desolate and lacking 'eyes on the street' already, just wait until no one has any reason to visit it unless they live there. (the old) Regent Park 2.0!
 
This going forward will make the neighbourhood markedly less walkable and urban in nature. What an amazing planning regime we have that purges the only non residential use, containing seemingly two dozen business many of them obviously small in nature, from a neighbourhood.
View attachment 621901
Crazy, a 2.5 sqkm chunk of land smack dab in the middle of the largest metro area in the country will be devoid of any retail. If you thought Rexdale was desolate and lacking 'eyes on the street' already, just wait until no one has any reason to visit it unless they live there. (the old) Regent Park 2.0!

I agree that there should be more at-grade retail than what is contemplated here.

But just for clarity, what is contemplated is not zero.

This is the current ground-floor plan:

1735289222251.png

Red is retail; that's a minimum of 2 units, totally ~6,000ft2

The actually elevation drawings show the retail as six units.
 
Apologies, was scrolling through the thread half asleep lol. Building looks quite attractive, least it has some colour.
 

Back
Top