Toronto 200 University | 188.53m | 54s | GWL | KPMB

How do they define ‘easily’? Things can be distinct without being incongruous like this.
I recall reading something in another thread recently about a proposal that had to be re-submitted to the city because the herritage additon was too similar in style to the original building. I can't remember whether the poster cited a specific city rule, but I distinctly remember someone saying that.

That being said I can't find any reference to that rule online but maybe I'm not looking in the right places.

To be honest, I don't think the addition looks terrible, just a bit unremarkable. I do kind of like how it appears to hover over the existing structure though.
 
A few additional perspectives:


200 University 1.jpeg
200 University 2.jpeg
 
I recall reading something in another thread recently about a proposal that had to be re-submitted to the city because the herritage additon was too similar in style to the original building. I can't remember whether the poster cited a specific city rule, but I distinctly remember someone saying that.

That being said I can't find any reference to that rule online but maybe I'm not looking in the right places.

To be honest, I don't think the addition looks terrible, just a bit unremarkable. I do kind of like how it appears to hover over the existing structure though.
 
The Settlement Offer for this one is on next week's Council agenda:

High Level Link:


Offer:


From the above:

1721396989847.png


* of note here, the office space is gone...........and in exchange; this bit that will be of interest to @HousingNowTO

1721397046985.png

1721397070163.png

1721397089913.png

Arch. Plans are here:


Renders from the above ( @Paclo these are at 50%)

1721397159151.png


1721397173208.png
 
Last edited:

Back
Top