Toronto 191 Bay | 301.74m | 64s | QuadReal | Hariri Pontarini

Automation Gallery

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
12,654
Reaction score
3,281
Location
South Parkdale
WOW:cool:, didn't see this coming

25 KING ST W
Ward 28 - Tor & E.York District

Zoning By-law Amendement to permit the construction of a 64-storey office/retail building with a height of 298.14 m., and a gross floor area of 180,259 sq.m. on the existing Commerce Court site. The proposal includes an addition to the Hotel Victoria building. The existing Commerce Court South and East buildings are proposed to be demolished.
Proposed Use --- # of Storeys --- # of Units ---
Applications:
Type Number Date Submitted Status
Rezoning 17 277715 STE 28 OZ Dec 20, 2017 Under Review
► Supporting Documentation

cibc 4.PNG
cibc 1.PNG
cibc 2.PNG
cibc 2.PNG
cibc 3.PNG
 

Attachments

  • cibc 4.PNG
    cibc 4.PNG
    933.6 KB · Views: 54,220
  • cibc 1.PNG
    cibc 1.PNG
    898.8 KB · Views: 52,594
  • cibc 2.PNG
    cibc 2.PNG
    842.5 KB · Views: 49,894
  • cibc 3.PNG
    cibc 3.PNG
    397.8 KB · Views: 43,117
Last edited:
Very exciting proposal in terms of size and impact, but it feels very shoe-horned onto the site (in a way that compromises the site and CCW and CCN).

...and on a more personal/subjective note, they'd be demolishing my favourite part of Commerce Court and a favourite building of mine in the Financial District. :( The buildings they plan to demolish are an excellent example of the classy, demure buildings of the Financial District before the height-and-everything-glass craze took over. They have a very 80s/90s Toronto feel to me, which I would be sad to lose.

I'm all for more towers and density in the Financial District but this one feels really shoe-horned into the site. I wish Brookfield Place would beat them to the market and build their third tower, on Front Street. That would be much more ideal than another tower at Commerce Court.
 
Nice unexpected hit of the year. Reminds me of KPF’s Bank of America in NYC.

From Renderings 2

5F1F6F6B-A9E3-4ABC-95E3-1C2DE1C70A7A.jpeg


And Architectural Plans 2

D4A799E7-77EC-46C2-916B-89075742E637.jpeg


Apparently there will be an awkward addition facing Yonge:

E2006D31-5D8F-454E-9748-BEEE8B15C30C.jpeg


F1BC91EA-464C-4644-AC1B-B56BC30BE815.jpeg


Street level details:

EC909CF6-D7C3-46AA-B4CE-9211B9B99E39.jpeg


F0C804B1-A3E2-4C29-BEB3-5CD8D327B6F9.jpeg


E65BFAFB-65A6-47DF-BAA8-B8DC49FA4625.jpeg


AoD
 

Attachments

  • 5F1F6F6B-A9E3-4ABC-95E3-1C2DE1C70A7A.jpeg
    5F1F6F6B-A9E3-4ABC-95E3-1C2DE1C70A7A.jpeg
    79.7 KB · Views: 35,161
  • D4A799E7-77EC-46C2-916B-89075742E637.jpeg
    D4A799E7-77EC-46C2-916B-89075742E637.jpeg
    173.5 KB · Views: 35,076
  • E2006D31-5D8F-454E-9748-BEEE8B15C30C.jpeg
    E2006D31-5D8F-454E-9748-BEEE8B15C30C.jpeg
    176.9 KB · Views: 33,930
  • F1BC91EA-464C-4644-AC1B-B56BC30BE815.jpeg
    F1BC91EA-464C-4644-AC1B-B56BC30BE815.jpeg
    158.1 KB · Views: 32,497
  • EC909CF6-D7C3-46AA-B4CE-9211B9B99E39.jpeg
    EC909CF6-D7C3-46AA-B4CE-9211B9B99E39.jpeg
    97.3 KB · Views: 31,877
  • F0C804B1-A3E2-4C29-BEB3-5CD8D327B6F9.jpeg
    F0C804B1-A3E2-4C29-BEB3-5CD8D327B6F9.jpeg
    119.7 KB · Views: 31,406
  • E65BFAFB-65A6-47DF-BAA8-B8DC49FA4625.jpeg
    E65BFAFB-65A6-47DF-BAA8-B8DC49FA4625.jpeg
    109.8 KB · Views: 29,973
Last edited:
That's not much of a spire—that's a cloaked aerial, and that's it really. If you're looking to have it as a spire, and it's an asymmetrical building, have it come out from the highest corner, not the middle. Meh so far.

42
 

Back
Top