ChesterCopperpot
Senior Member
Well - it's only 224m to the 54th floor which is an average of 4.1m per floor - which is pretty standard for office buildings. The "bump" at the top makes up the remaining 42m
I agree. If it was up to me, I'd ship all those facades (including the M+G buildings) to some city lot in a new development. West Donlands, East Bayfronts.. This is a sure fire way to give those new areas a feeling of permanency.
Otherwise, this building will end up looking like a barnacle on this fine tower.
870ft is pretty tall for a 54 storey commercial tower is it not? For this height I would expect 60 stories. Why is this tower so tall with only 54 floors planned?
Let's just hope that the city doesn't ruin this project.
its nice looking, so, it'll get canned.
ZING!
I've rarely taken issue with the Design Review Panel; for the most part, they are a group of well-deserving professionals. The only head-scratcher for me that has really stuck in my memory was when they took issue with Saucier+Perrotte's design for a boutique hotel in the Distillery District.