bkden
New Member
I’d love to get some of what this architect was smoking. What a terrible intersection of the tower and podium, not to mention the dated office building facade. What a shame.
Sad because the visitors of those places are still hereThe loveable neighbourhood dive bar/old school local watering hole is a dying breed, mate.
You've been on UrbanToronto for years and years and years @syn, so what's keeping you from recognizing that it's too early in the process for this to have gone to the DRP yet?Wow, this is atrocious. Don't we have a design review panel in this city? What are they doing?
I'd gladly keep the character that's there now over this soulless junk.
If they're going to destroy more of the city's heritage it should be, at the very least, outstanding.
You've been on UrbanToronto for years and years and years @syn, so what's keeping you from recognizing that it's too early in the process for this to have gone to the DRP yet?
42
The DRP's decisions are nonbinding. The applicant is free to accept the advice or ignore it as they choose.That front blue/white striped generic office facade ruins this promising building. The Design Review Panel needs an overhaul if they approved this. New progressive mayor = new panel w high quality taste.
A new front page story, here: https://urbantoronto.ca/news/2023/08/dundas-church-proposal-shortened-helicopter-flight-path.53597
Took me back to this thread, where I see @MessiGoat had hidden some news back in June.
From the updated docs:
View attachment 500746
View attachment 500747
That’s ridiculous. Then why even have that panel?The DRP's decisions are nonbinding. The applicant is free to accept the advice or ignore it as they choose.