AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
This is going to be Yonge and Eglinton's Aura.
Edit: But worse.
Doubtful - I have yet to see any cheapened HP project reach level of design incompetence that is Aura.
AoD
This is going to be Yonge and Eglinton's Aura.
Edit: But worse.
The only projects I can think of that we're not the best are pinnacle on Adelaide and that mid rise near Lawrence, and even then they are not terrible.Doubtful - I have yet to see any cheapened HP project reach level of design incompetence that is Aura.
AoD
This is going to be Yonge and Eglinton's Aura.
Edit: But worse.
Let's say architecture is entirely subjective for the moment. Aura will be the dominant tower between Yorkville and the CBD for the foreseeable future. This one, if it even gets built to these specs, will be surrounded by equally tall towers.
That's true although I don't consider the Eaton Chelsea proposal as a serious one.
Just to play off what you said, the existing building, on a simple architectural basis, really holds a strong sense of urbanity along the intersection of Yonge and Eglinton, in the sense of just using simple lines as both functional yet tastefully asthetic with the red hue and simple boxes. The colonnades, although relatively meh with the experience to walk under, still hold up well with what was attempted at the time of construction. I'd rather not see this redeveloped, but if they at least tried referencing what was built previous to the proposed highrise, that would maybe make people less antsy with the overall design of what this holds. (Apologies if this post sounds like a rant, it isn't meant to be)They should keep the nice rich existing granite facade just like they do with the old historical buildings. Then modify the first few floors for main entrance view after shoring the ground. Modify the upper part of the building a little to blend with the base. After all the building the stands there is more nice looking than the cheap clear looking box for a podium being proposed.
Why?
I can understand your point, and why this sounds very pointless, although at least attempting to keep the office portion of the building with some amount of the original material would be at least showing consideration to what was constructed before this highrise.It sounds "all good" but not feasible to build a 65 storey skyscraper and keep that bldg. that probably needs to be updated and a complete retrofit?
It sounds "all good" but not feasible to build a 65 storey skyscraper and keep that bldg. that probably needs to be updated and a complete retrofit?
You never have much hope of anything that gets proposed here in TO..lolJust a gut feeling with respects to the ownership and a very good time to go through rezoning with no real intention to build.