News   Apr 26, 2024
 545     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 395     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 582     0 

Too Many Realtors?

luxome

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
517
Reaction score
0
Location
Toronto
Is it just me or do you guys think there are too many real estate agents? EVERYWHERE i go, i get asked to buy/sell real estate with them. It's horrible. Will there ever be TOO MANY realtors? or will the numbers just keep on growing? They're like scavengers, lol...where are the good/professional realtors??????

I've also noticed that many turn to become a real estate agent when they lose their full time jobs.
 
We had Micheal Polzer on the show

Check out what he wrote:


RE/MAX Ontario Atlantic Canada Inc. - Voice Of Real Estate
Dear RE/MAX Sales Associates, Broker-Owners and Managers:

Taking back the industry

2009 proved to be a defining year for real estate, creating two very separate and distinct categories of realtor.

Experienced professionals, who stayed the course, adjusting to new conditions and adhering to solid business plans, were ideally positioned for the turnaround and emerged victorious from the downturn. The fair-weather realtors who were ill-prepared and panicked, who chose to bury their heads in the sand, were not.

I think it's time we formally acknowledge the elephant in the room.

Last year, one in five realtors failed to sell a home on TREB -- the largest board in the world. From what I understand, the same problem exists in smaller boards across Ontario and Atlantic Canada.

No one in the industry, however, has mentioned how this threatens both the consumer and the profession. Our industry is overrun by part-timers who lack the knowledge and experience to service their clients adequately. The ease with which they can hang a shingle and tarnish our profession is astounding.

Personally, I can't believe that no one has challenged this reality. With the exception of those sales associates that are new to the business – and we have some stellar rookies who have already achieved Platinum Club in their first year in the business -- and those that are winding successful real estate careers, I find it hard to fathom that one in five agents sell nothing at all. Fifty-three per cent do not do a deal a quarter yet are prepared to provide guidance to buyers and sellers making the largest single financial transaction of their lifetime.

Just who is looking out for the real estate consumer? Cab drivers? Waiters? This trend is not in the best interest of our clients, and if we, as realtors, want to raise the bar in the industry, this simply cannot continue.

Here are my thoughts on the issue. For starters, at least one-quarter of agents should be barred from trading in real estate…it's time to put the professionalism back in the profession. It's time we raise the bar and set new standards. If we don't, this group of unqualified realtors will continue to have a serious negative impact on the industry.

If this sounds familiar, it's because you've heard it before. One year ago, I talked about how uncommitted realtors were creating problems within the industry. However, at that time, economic concerns loomed overhead, a global financial crisis was brewing, and home sales had slowed to a crawl. We thought that the downturn would clean house, effectively purging the industry of non-producers and part-timers.

But the slowdown proved short-lived. And as real estate gained momentum, everyone jumped in it to make a fast buck. So it's time to get serious. We need to enlist your help and create a plan of action. After all, the greatest opportunity to raise standards is through licensing and we'd like to see stricter rules governing the registration of realtors. What about introducing a minimum sales requirement before licensing? Or an apprenticeship program where new sales associates gain valuable insight before they are licensed?

I challenge anyone in the industry to argue why a part-timer or non-producer should be allowed to trade in real estate. Stand up and please tell us how consumers benefit. Explain why Ontario needs 57,000 realtors.

My commitment to you will be to pursue this issue at all levels of government and associated organizations. I will call upon the leaders and directors of CREA, OREA, RECO and real estate boards in Ontario and Atlantic Canada to support me in this cause. These are excellent organizations, but all have built their infrastructure based on membership numbers. Is that in the best interest of the full-time real estate professional? Join us in writing to the Minister of Government Services, the Honourable Harinder S. Takhar at htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org and the Minister of Consumer Services, the Honourable Ted McMeekin, responsible for the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act, 2002 at tmcmeekin.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org to request sweeping changes to rules governing registration and licensing to protect the integrity of the profession and consumer interest.

We'd all benefit from an industry overhaul. We see the impact of those mistakes time and time again. The committed, dedicated professionals that have devoted their lives to selling homes would give their eye tooth to get rid of the clutter and restore honour and dignity to the profession. After all, the lack of commitment and expertise among part-timers affects the entire industry.

We need to send the message, once and for all -- real estate is not a fall-back profession. This industry is not a circus. It's time we rid ourselves of the elephant in the room.

Sincerely,
Michael Polzler Signature
Michael Polzler
Executive Vice President and Regional Director
RE/MAX Ontario-Atlantic Canada Inc.
 
FYI, junk bonds are usually sold by highly skilled and knowledgeable people, to highly sophisticated and knowledgeable buyers, who know exactly what they are doing.

Seriously, I have read many an appeal such as the one from Mr. Polzler, reproduced above. What exactly is he proposing to do about it? Are there no part-timers or non-producing people in his organization? How would he weed them out? What about people who join TREB or other boards just because they want the MLS information, but don't intend to sell? What about the part-timers who are highly experienced but semi-retired? What about non-selling managers?

Maybe even more to the point, what about anti-competition concerns? The real estate business is already dealing with this concern (in terms of MLS rules), as he would be well aware.

The best course of action, IMO, is to simply let the market take its course. Those who make it, make it, and those who don't, will know faster than anyone else that they should move on.
 
The best course of action, IMO, is to simply let the market take its course. Those who make it, make it, and those who don't, will know faster than anyone else that they should move on.

I like this idea and am a strong proponent of the open market. However it is the first time buyers who lack information who end up suffering making a poor purchase with poor advice. That's my only issue. One could argue that that is their problem and they should have done more research. However I still think a little more regulation would be better. IMHO
 
The fundamental problem of real estate is that is is NOT, in general, a highly skilled profession, yet commands highly skilled compensation, that is why there are so many part-timers. Where else can you take a joke of a 3 month bi-weekly, nightly, correspondence course and then start charging 4-6% commission on $300 000+ properties? Many people look upon it, right or wrong, as a get-rich quick scheme. That's not to say that some agents aren't extremely professional, highly skilled, experienced and worth every cent - I know several - but even they continually complain about how they have to deal with inexperienced realtors. I always say to them - then change the way you charge commission. 1-2% for the newbies and as you prove yourself, your commission goes up - like almost every other profession on the planet.
 
that's an interesting point simuls.

I myself have no issue with most realtors even the inexperienced ones.

The only ones who annoy me are those that constantly attach theiir educational credentials with their name. Like I'm John Smith, MBA.
 
You know, I'll let the real estate industry guild reform itself if it so chooses.

I believe for all professions and trades, having an open system with a wide spectrum of levels of competency or a closed system with tightly controlled standards each creates positive and negative outcomes. I'm not an agent, infact I often avoid the open market entirely and look for private deals; however, I don't think people truly appreciate the skill it takes to make sales, negotiate deals and handle clientele.

I think the reason for this is most people appreciate hard skills, but undervalue and have gaps in their comprehension of soft skills. The poor reputation of sales people in general I think stems largely from this kind of mis-understanding. I come from a scientific and technical background but I have benefited greatly from learning more about the psychology and mechanics of sales. If you dislike salespeople or agents or the game of negotiation I suggest, like myself, you learn more about it because it probably bothers you for the wrong reasons. That said, there are times where the incentives behind the compensation of the professional service do not favour the interests of the client, and I think an argument can be made that this is partly the case in real estate.
 
^ I hope you don't mean that literally. A "big crash" causes a lot of damage to a lot of people, and weeding out realtors is the least of it.

I think there is some merit in suggestion that there should be some mentoring period, apprenticeship, call it what you will. As noted, you can become a full-fledged agent after taking only three courses, and although you would have to take further courses after that, perhaps too many people are being let loose on the public with insufficient training and supervision.

I don't sell, but I am constantly speaking to agents, and am in a position to see how they work. Many are very highly professional and competent, and worth their money beyond any doubt, particularly those who handle commercial property as opposed to residential. But I see more than a few who take a "fly by seat of the pants" attitude and just don't seem to know what they are really doing, and I sit and wonder where their broker or office manager is.
 
that's an interesting point simuls.

I myself have no issue with most realtors even the inexperienced ones.

The only ones who annoy me are those that constantly attach theiir educational credentials with their name. Like I'm John Smith, MBA.

If anything, i would think they are SUBSTANTIALLY overqualified to be a realtor.

I don't think it's the part-timers that are the problem, but the people that violate the 'ethics' (used very loosely in this context) as an agent.

I think the market will dictate the sustainability of the career choice. Like any 'free lance' position that requires very little capital investment, you'll always find shady individuals. Espcially in a market that is blazing hot!
 
Last edited:
Applicants must:

1. Have an Ontario Secondary School Diploma or equivalent; OR
2. Be at least 18 years of age, complete the Canadian Adult Achievement Test Level D and attain results reflecting a grade equivalence of at least 12.9 (completion of high school).

Is this new?? i'm sure they were realizing that people who can barely speak English were passing the courses and practicing in real estate.
 
Personally, I feel Polzler's comment that people get into this as the market was hot is because they can make an inordinate amount of money with a few sales. this just attests to the fact that R/E commissions are not reasonable. The lawyer gets perhaps a $1000 to close a house/condo. 10 years ago, he got perhaps $700 for the same closing.Skill level and degree of liability much greater than the realtor yet the realtor gets multiples of this sum (I understand about commission and no sale, no money and in fact lost time and expense).. House prices doubled in the time frame and R/E commissions effectively doubled. The reason less than qualified people flock to the profession is that it is well paid for the level of skill required to do the job. This is the simple reality. I am not a R/E agent basher, however, the commission approach, especially in the past hot market, and given the escalation in prices (recall that in toronto in the past 35 years prices have risen ten fold in some areas) was effectively rewarding minimal skill and effort with disproportionate rewards and hence the attempt by many to get on board the ship.

The problem is that to exclude part timers and new agents would only serve to further the anti competitive environment that CREA now finds itself in front of the tribunal for. Less agents, smaller click, controlling who can sell R/E. This ultimately would serve to drive up commissions and probably house prices and serve the interest of the R/E members and perhaps save those cllients who deal with less competant people but is really a self motivated argument to limit the "country club" to "established members. I do not think this is a good idea. Perhaps if the rewards more accurately reflected the work, expertise, knowledge required, everyone who Mr. Polzler feels should not be there would in fact not view it as a "quick buck" option and the problem would self resolve.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top