News   Jul 12, 2024
 720     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 666     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 295     0 

The Tenor (10 Dundas St E, Ent Prop Trust, 10s, Baldwin & Franklin)

  • Thread starter billy corgan19982
  • Start date
I'm so glad PE is out of the picture and hope for some kind of serious change. (give that thing a proper ceiling!)

Add to that, finish the outdoor roof line as proposed in the renderings to complete the design of the building. It's like a cake without the icing. Completing the roof line would help move the eyes from all that unsightly HVAC running along the upper roof (which could also be painted so as to not stand out so much) and if illuminated by LED lighting it would add some visual interest at night. A few exterior touches here & there (along with improved, animated signage in years to come and correcting the spacing between those angled "cast-off's" around the main video board) could go a long way to improving the exterior. Oh, and apply for new ad space in front of faux fans.
Then in 2020 new owner demolishes the corner and rebuilds a truly iconic building here with a hotel and/or condo tower on top.
I can dream.
 
....finally some answers why the exterior Toronto Life Square signs have not been installed. Perhaps a new owner will breathe some new life into the square with structural and aesthetic improvements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Building a winner in midst of failure

Jul 23, 2009 04:30 AM
Christopher Hume

As failures go, this is one of the most successful in the city's history.

Despite the fact the company behind Toronto Life Square has gone into receivership, the project is by all accounts doing just fine, thank you very much.

In case you're wondering, Toronto Life Square shouldn't be confused with Yonge-Dundas Square across the road. The latter really is a square, the former a building.

Constructed on land expropriated by the pre-amalgamation City of Toronto in the late 1990s, the massive entertainment complex was developed by a subsidiary of PenEquity Realty Corp. From the start, however, the project was nothing but trouble for the firm. Work on the building began five years behind schedule, and only after a series of setbacks. At one point, Disney, a prospective tenant, simply walked away from the table, leaving PenEquity in a state of open-mouthed shock.

Of course, Toronto Life Square – the building – isn't much to look at. Big, grey and hopelessly plain, it had almost nothing going for it other than its location, but what a location. Occupying the northeast corner of Yonge and Dundas, one of Toronto's and Canada's busiest and most important intersections, it couldn't help but succeed.

The collapse of PenEquity has more to do with its own ineptitude and the economic meltdown than the viability of the complex itself.

Indeed, when the city took over the land, the idea was to use the public realm as a way to intervene and reverse the decline of the neighbourhood. In the late 1990s, don't forget, Yonge and Dundas has been sucked into a downward spiral of dollar stores and cheap clothing outlets, drugs and crime. Landlords weren't maintaining their buildings and visitors were staying away in droves.

The Eaton Centre didn't help either. Though it is the city's largest tourist attraction, it sucked people off the streets, turning the neighbourhood into an urban wasteland.

But since then things have improved hugely; though Dundas Square has not been universally embraced, there's no question it has improved the look and feel of the area immeasurably, attracting thousands and thousands of people and prompting millions of dollars worth of improvements to surrounding buildings. Even the Eaton Centre rebuilt its main facade and life returned to the streets.

So it's no surprise that real estate professionals say it won't be hard to find a buyer for Toronto Life Square. In fact, the complex has never been more desirable as a piece of real estate.

PenEquity's crisis was triggered three months ago when the Royal Bank called in its $123 million loan. By then, the developer's debt had soared to $280 million.

But as James Robinson, the executive director of the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Association, points out, "It makes little difference to the public who owns the building."

"The project was conceived as a catalyst for regeneration of the district," he explains, "and that has happened. What we're seeing in the receivership is a result of financing and economic conditions. There's no doubt Toronto Life Square has reinvigorated the street. Even before it was built, it had spurred investment. People forget but in the mid-1990s, the area was in serious decline with drug dealing and petty crime. The building is fully tenanted from a retail perspective, and they all seem to be doing well. In my view, it has done its job."

Those tenants, who include AMC, Future Shop, Adidas and various restaurant chains, may be the usual commercial suspects. But in this case, they will be wanted whether PenEquity is dead or alive.

Christopher Hume can be reached at chume@thestar.ca

Source
Video
 
Yes, Mr Hume but is it still "horrorchitecture"

"If this weren't injury enough, the insult lies in the fact that the complex was built on prime real estate expropriated by the city back in the late 1990s for the purpose of revitalizing the neighbourhood. But even before this galactic coal-carrier is finally finished later this year, it's clear it will add little to the area, except its sheer bulk."

"What makes it all so laughable is that Toronto Life Square likes to pass itself off as this city's answer to Times Square in New York. That might lead one to expect noisy crowds, commercial kitsch and vertigo-inducing video ads, all of which can be fun in small doses once or twice a decade. Instead, we get a building so dead and inert, one feels uncomfortable walking past it."


http://www.thestar.com/article/293729
 
When describing this structure, Hume who coined one of my all time favourite phrases "crime against urbanity". That was then. What is now?

Has Hume been muzzled? I know that Star has taken a quality dip lately (Hairdresser Wars rock the foundation of Yorkville!) but this turncoat by Hume is unexpected.

No where in his article does he discuss the architecture of the building, instead calling it a commerical success in the midst of real estate failure. If commercialism is Hume's new measure of success then he can go back to making river metaphors under the gardiner and not return.
 
No where in his article does he discuss the architecture of the building, instead calling it a commerical success in the midst of real estate failure.
Sure he does...

Of course, Toronto Life Square – the building – isn't much to look at. Big, grey and hopelessly plain, it had almost nothing going for it other than its location, but what a location.

Regardless, Hume is The Star's Urban Affairs critic and not all of his columns are architectural in nature (such as this one).
 
...plus, anyone who tries to claim that the building itself is empty or that the area hasn't come a long way from where it was even five years ago is being willfully blind at this point.

It's an ugly building. It was a missed opportunity. But even ugly buildings and missed opportunities have upsides.
 
This building is ugly, but that could be rectified with a few changes and some nice cladding.
 
^ I do. Because of broken path flows, and because TLS' largest clientele are Ryerson students (who are only there part of the day), the "sales p/ sq. foot" is much lower than it could be.

An investor with money to buy Toronto Life Square will also have capital to invest in improving the flow within the building, its access from the street (why the heck isn't there a main entrance on Yonge St???) and its visual appeal.

Toronto Life Square always had so much potential but it was PenEquity's inability to capitalize on that with poor vision, lack of capital and credibility that made the building what it is today.

There is room for improvement and I believe we will see it once the building is sold.
 
Sure the recession hurts your business...

However you then act smart and minimize costs to compensate for your reduction in sales.

The main tenants are doing well and the food court is decently used during the day.

When the University is in session then it is full.
 

Back
Top