News   Dec 08, 2025
 296     1 
News   Dec 08, 2025
 848     2 
News   Dec 08, 2025
 2.9K     8 

The coming $26 billion windfall for the Canadian Armed Forces. What to buy?

Your ideal fighter for the RCAF is Russian or Chinese?
Why not? The president of the United States - a certifiable madman - is waging an ECONOMIC WAR on Canada. According to Carney, this war on Canada has already wiped out 1.8% of our GDP, or about $50 billion, or, put another way, has taken $1,300 out of the pocket of every Canadian man, woman, and child. This is the REALITY! Under these circumstances, why would Canada ever contemplate buying any military equipment from the United States until Trump lifts all tariffs? These massive contracts should have been used as leverage by Carney. Months ago, Carney should have told Trump that we are suspending ALL military purchases from the United States until Trump lifts all tariffs on Canada within a specified period of time, after which the contracts will be cancelled and our divorce from the United States will be complete.

Can you cite any examples of when China or Russia has retaliated against Canada, costing our economy billions? Just one example? At this point in our relationship with the United States, why wouldn't we prefer to do business with China or Russia instead of the United States? Turkey, a NATO nation with the biggest military after the United States, bought Russian S-400 air defense systems (best in the world). Canada should follow Turkey's example. We can no longer be a US vasal state. Not when Trump is taking a sledgehammer to our economy. Canada needs to get out of this abusive relationship with the United States. It is like our country is suffering from a form of battered spouse syndrome.
 
Last edited:
Even if we decide they will all be ordered in Korea, we're talking at least half a decade before first delivery, and 10-15 years for order completion.
The Koreans are going all out to woo us. Even so, I didn’t expect to see an ad for Korean submarines in today’s Toronto Star.

IMG_3698.png

Good looking website, https://kss-iii.ca. No coupon or promo though?
 
Last edited:
Surprised this was not posted already in this thread.


If Europe is serious about rearmament, then they will not be able to do it fully themselves. The likes of SAAB, Rheinmettal, and others cannot simply multiply their production lines sixfold overnight. Either their procurement will be scheduled for 2035 or they will need to procure from places like India, Korea, and, perhaps, Canada? And why not Canada, the expertise and manufacturing capacity is here, as is the access to raw goods and materials.
 
Surprised this was not posted already in this thread.


If Europe is serious about rearmament, then they will not be able to do it fully themselves. The likes of SAAB, Rheinmettal, and others cannot simply multiply their production lines sixfold overnight. Either their procurement will be scheduled for 2035 or they will need to procure from places like India, Korea, and, perhaps, Canada? And why not Canada, the expertise and manufacturing capacity is here, as is the access to raw goods and materials.
What do we make that they need?
 
Armoured vehicles probably if we are discussing Canadian products, but more likely, this will be European products by European defence firms, procured by European militaries on Canadian shores, to reduce costs and expedite delivery timelines.
You mean Europeans setting up shops in Canada to produce what they procure?
 
The low fee for Canada to join SAFE (10million euros) is making some question the potential benefits of the program. For reference, the UK was being asked to pay between 4 and 6.5 Billion euros.
1764903688411.png

OTTAWA —The European Union says Canada will need to pay 10 million euros -- the equivalent of C$16 million -- to join a defence procurement agreement with the continent, a price tag that is raising questions about how much investment the pact will generate.
The EU has asked the U.K. to pay between 4 and 6.5 billion euros, several times the size of Canada’s fee.

Universite du Quebec a Montreal professor Justin Massie wrote on the social media platform X that the much smaller Canadian fee raises questions about how much investment the deal will bring to Canada.

“Given that the entry costs are based on the expected benefits a third-party will derive from access to the EU instrument, we should temper our expectations,” he wrote.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/art...a-must-pay-10m-euros-to-join-eu-defence-deal/
 
Surprised this was not posted already in this thread.

Cause it's really not as big a deal as some think. It's like buying a guest pass at a gym. That's what €10M is. We're doing it so some of our companies get access to the market.

If Europe is serious about rearmament, then they will not be able to do it fully themselves. The likes of SAAB, Rheinmettal, and others cannot simply multiply their production lines sixfold overnight. Either their procurement will be scheduled for 2035 or they will need to procure from places like India, Korea, and, perhaps, Canada? And why not Canada, the expertise and manufacturing capacity is here, as is the access to raw goods and materials.

They are trying to do exactly what we are trying to do: keep more defence dollars at home. And if not in country, then in Europe. Setting up assembly lines in Canada wouldn't make sense for them. Those are the easiest jobs to keep.

What do we make that they need?

We make some of the best simulators (CAE), electro-optical sensors (Wescam) and satellites (MDA), mission software (GD Mission Systems and Lock Mart Canada) around. The LAV is so good, the Americans bought a version of it as the Stryker. Broadly, the public is mostly ignorant of defence issues and defaults to understanding things they can understand and look up on Wikipedia like fighter jets. It's why you won't see the average muggle talking about something like this:

 
Cause it's really not as big a deal as some think. It's like buying a guest pass at a gym. That's what €10M is. We're doing it so some of our companies get access to the market.



They are trying to do exactly what we are trying to do: keep more defence dollars at home. And if not in country, then in Europe. Setting up assembly lines in Canada wouldn't make sense for them. Those are the easiest jobs to keep.



We make some of the best simulators (CAE), electro-optical sensors (Wescam) and satellites (MDA), mission software (GD Mission Systems and Lock Mart Canada) around. The LAV is so good, the Americans bought a version of it as the Stryker. Broadly, the public is mostly ignorant of defence issues and defaults to understanding things they can understand and look up on Wikipedia like fighter jets. It's why you won't see the average muggle talking about something like this:

It's Lockheed Martin Canada, a US company?
 

Back
Top