O
Observer Walt
Guest
e: Statue on University
Van Gogh probably would have stood a good chance, but I wonder if Oscar Nemon would have? Or some 20-something newcomer without an established reputation, but with some talent? The art world is notoriously incestuous as already mentioned and has long had a reputation for not being much open to new ideas / personalities. A review committee is probably a good idea, but not if it is completely made up of artists.
As for "Gumby", while some obviously don't like it, others do, and maybe that's not bad for public art, which is supposed to provoke thought and discussion.
Van Gogh probably would have stood a good chance, but I wonder if Oscar Nemon would have? Or some 20-something newcomer without an established reputation, but with some talent? The art world is notoriously incestuous as already mentioned and has long had a reputation for not being much open to new ideas / personalities. A review committee is probably a good idea, but not if it is completely made up of artists.
As for "Gumby", while some obviously don't like it, others do, and maybe that's not bad for public art, which is supposed to provoke thought and discussion.




