News   Jan 07, 2025
 1K     2 
News   Jan 07, 2025
 4.1K     14 
News   Jan 07, 2025
 533     1 

Star - Nurture T.O.'s Creativity, Report Urges

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
From the Star:

Nurture T.O.'s creativity, report urges
Jul. 24, 2006. 05:35 AM
VANESSA LU
CITY HALL BUREAU CHIEF

Toronto could be one of the world's great cities for artists and scientists, but it must take aggressive strategic steps to make the best use of its existing talent and encourage new thinking, a report says.

Such steps would include better access to funding and more arts-based education, it says.

"Toronto has to realize how important creativity is to its economic and social well-being," said Meric Gertler, a University of Toronto professor and one of the authors of Imagine a Toronto ... Strategies for a Creative City, which is being released today.

Commissioned by Premier Dalton McGuinty and Toronto Mayor David Miller, the report is the product of 18 months' work by a special team led by Gertler that included representatives from business, non-profit and arts communities.

Members included Glen Grunwald, president of the Toronto Board of Trade, Ilse Treurnicht, CEO of MaRS, Mark Robert, managing partner of the Carlu, John Honderich, special adviser to the Premier on the future of the GTA and Creative Cities, and Toronto's poet laureate Pier Giorgio di Cicco.

"We have lots of great assets, but if we don't do more, faster, we do risk falling behind the competition," Gertler said, notably cities like London. "We need to embrace risk-taking, and we need to celebrate our successes."

The report urges the city to consider:

Creating an investment fund with the express purpose of letting artists, organizations and creative enterprises have the financial option of owning rather than leasing their premises.

In New York, high rents are squeezing the artists out of the very neighbourhoods that need artists to thrive. Similarly, Queen St. W. has long been a hive of creative activity, but rising costs have pushed struggling artists further west.

Consider ways of allocating resources and leverage new sources of funding for the creative industries, possibly a dedicated tax or share of existing sales, hotel or gas taxes.

Provide ongoing, stable funding for creative projects through a renewed commitment from all governments as well as from the private sector.

Ensure an arts-based education for all with access to visual arts, music and drama in the public schools — perhaps with private sector partners.
Grant free admission to museums and art galleries for those under 20 to give young people from all neighbourhoods and income levels access. Or a Doors Open campaign during the school week to give children a chance to see great architecture.
Turn community centres into creative community hubs, tapping into many of the diverse cultural neighbourhoods that exist in Toronto. They could be combined with economic revitalization programs for at-risk neighbourhoods that could be adapted for specific interests and talents.

Expand existing small business and entrepreneur programs to include specialized support for creative industries.

Develop a creativity/innovation convergence centre like the MaRS Centre, which is focused on science-based convergence and innovation, to offer emerging businesses access to risk capital, management resources and strategic business tools. In a creative economy, a growing amount of economic activity depends on creativity for generating wealth unlike a traditional economy, such as a resources economy through mining or logging. It's the additional input of a creative or innovative spark that generates value — and in a global economy, that's becoming more and more important.

Creative industries include film and television production, publishing, advertising, music, design, visual and performing arts, but can cross over to include science and biotechnology. By investing in creativity and innovation, it not only generates wealth and job opportunities, it also helps a city thrive — with revitalized neighbourhoods, innovative thinking and community engagement.

Toronto and the surrounding region — with its cultural diversity, strong educational institutions and liveable neighbourhoods — are on "the cusp of a creative breakthrough," the report says, noting the cultural renaissance taking place with a new opera centre and expanded galleries and museums.

Gertler believes Toronto already has quite a few success stories, but lacks an entity to link forces, nurture creativity and learn from experience.

Examples include the Toronto Fashion Incubator, created in 1986, to give up-and-coming designers a start; 401 Richmond, a building near Spadina Ave. that houses creative entrepreneurs, charging market rents as well as rents based on ability to pay; and Artscape, which provides affordable work spaces for artists.

He argues a top priority should be creating an umbrella group or organization to co-ordinate the region's creative strategy. It could be a multi-stakeholder group, or possibly an office situated within an existing structure, but it should include public, private and non-profit sectors to be effective.

"We don't expect just government to take the ball and run," said Ontario Trillium Foundation chair Helen Burstyn, who was also a member of the project team. "It's not for government to do everything. I hope there are ideas that will be picked up by the private sector and organizations."

AoD
 
And the Globe:

Cities get a creative kick in the pants
Toronto and London deliver a plan to give the urban arts a booster shot
VAL ROSS

From Monday's Globe and Mail

At noon today, when Toronto Mayor David Miller and Ontario tourism minister Jim Bradley turn up in the gleaming precincts of the MaRS (Medical and Related Sciences) Centre adjacent to Toronto General Hospital, it won't be to tell the nation about some breakthrough in avian flu or nanotechnology. Instead, these worthies, joined by such non-medical figures as the City of Toronto poet laureate Pier Giorgio di Cicco, are gathering to hail a well-known but underutilized steroid for the soul of urban Canada: creativity.

The prescription the report's authors are officially unveiling is a 40-page document, Imagine a Toronto. . . Strategies for a Creative City. Its recommendations could be applied as easily to Vancouver or Halifax, and they arrive at a key moment in strenuous nationwide efforts to pump hundreds of millions of dollars into new theatre, gallery, museum and concert spaces. But even if our cities do a heroic job of building and paying for all this, without the right long-term policies to attract and make space for artists, audiences will dwindle, patrons will move away and the buildings will stand idle.

And if cities can't also support talent in 21st-century creative industries like video-game development, biomedical imaging or software design -- well, depression, urban decay and slow death loom. So the argument goes.

The Strategies for a Creative City report, two years and $600,000 in the making, was developed in partnership with Creative London, a parallel English project. The team that put it together went to see what's going on in Barcelona, Berlin, New York and San Francisco (Toronto put up $150,000, as did two Ontario provincial ministries; the rest came from the London Development Agency).

The report words its prescription as a challenge to "Imagine a Toronto" -- as in, imagine a city that offers people under age 20 free access to museums and galleries. Imagine a city that pumps money into music, dance, filmmaking, theatre and creative writing classes in grade school. Imagine a city that keeps open community centres and public schools at night and on weekends, turning them over to local artists and inventors to work on anything from photography to fashion.

There's policy-wonkish advice, too, such as creating a mortgage investment fund for creative industries, establishing a design commissioner, or offering tax credits for firms that hire designers. Says team member Helen Burstyn, chair of the Ontario Trillium Foundation, "There's no reason a city can't do for design what Toronto has done for film."

If a city were to adopt such recommendations, the report's authors say they could rejuvenate a listless local economy, stimulate a region's ability to attract and retain innovators, inject growth hormones into homegrown talent and build strong, sturdy communities.

These prescriptions echo the thinking of American urban guru Richard Florida (author of The Rise of the Creative Class), which isn't surprising: He and the new report's project director, Meric Gertler, have collaborated before. In 2002, they ranked North American cities in terms of their "Bohemian Index" (openness, tolerance, ability to attract immigrants, artists and entrepreneurs, and the percentage of the work force in arts-related pursuits). Vancouver came first, with Toronto and Victoria behind -- far ahead of Montreal and U.S. cities.

While researching this latest report, Gertler (a professor of geography and scholar at the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto) confirmed those earlier observations.

The overheated U.S. real-estate market is hurting many artists now. Not only can artists and musicians not afford to live in San Francisco, even teacher-headed households are now priced out of 98 per cent of the area, says the July 16 San Francisco Chronicle, which also reported, "Sky-high housing prices empty cities of all but 'fauxhemians' . . . trust-fund hipsters and those who fund their bohemian lifestyles through corporate jobs they can't stand." New York has the same problems. "Obviously there's a huge critical mass of creative activity there, but it shows what not to do," says Gertler. "They're letting escalating real-estate costs force artists to flee to the boroughs."

Even though New York supports a large department of cultural affairs, he says, there's no city-wide strategy to protect the supply of living or studio space. Such affordable corners as artists can still find are tenuous. One New York developer bought derelict buildings in a forlorn corner of Brooklyn known as DUMBO (Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass) and offered space to artists for free -- but only so that they could serve as settlers in cultural outposts until he was ready to convert the spaces to high-end residential use.

Gertler's impressed by the Greenpoint Manufacturing and Design Centre, "an incredible old building on the Brooklyn waterfront that has filled up with people like carpenters working on opera sets, and displays for department-store windows. But the Brooklyn waterfront has been rezoned to permit large-scale resident development. Greenpoint is the last bastion."

American cities offered other lessons in what not to do. "In the late 1970s, California imposed radical caps on property tax," notes Gertler, "with the result that for 30 years public schools were underfunded, and arts education cut. A generation of teachers didn't even know how to teach the arts." Finally Silicon Valley's genius nerds, who played music and devoured sci-fi in their spare time, grew alarmed. With private funding from high-tech dynasties such as the Hewletts and Packards, the Cultural Initiative Silicon Valley launched a five-year scheme to bring back classes in dance, music and art.

Europe is a richer source of inspiration than the U.S. The London government's "creative hub" strategy targets down-and-dirty neighbourhoods such as Brixton and Whitechapel, setting up incubators for local businesses and real-estate information centres, and promoting locally made work. "It shows the importance of a non-market intervention," says Gertler.

With its revitalized waterfront and fizzing art-gallery scene, Barcelona is another model city. But its real lessons are about how a catalytic project, such as the 1992 Olympics, can align right-wing business leaders and left-wing city politicians to work together -- something that could and should happen in Vancouver.

In Toronto, the process of creating the Strategies for a Creative Citydocument has been a catalyst. Its 17-member leadership team was chosen to include media, the province, the city and the private, academic and non-profit sectors. "You need multi-stakeholder buy-in -- the last thing I wanted was to write a report that would gather dust," Gertler says.

AoD
 
Fantastic report, nice summary of all the new exciting developments taking place in Toronto's cultural sectors.

I like how it also awknowledges Mississauga's cultural efforts in the report.

Now its time to stop spending more time and money on reports, and let's get moving on the recommendations.

We need leadership, a plan, the money and power to take us to the next level.

Louroz
 
Re:Star - Nurture T.O's Creativity, Report

The DUMBO example reminds me of the Distillery District - low rents at first, renting to one-of-a-kind artsy craftsy ventures in order to create a fake bohemian ambience, then gradually raising the rents. I don't get the impression that much is being incubated by the Distillery District settlers, except resentment that there aren't many paying customers and a realization that they'll remain cut off from the rest of the city for some time.
 
"Even though New York supports a large department of cultural affairs, he says, there's no city-wide strategy to protect the supply of living or studio space. Such affordable corners as artists can still find are tenuous. One New York developer bought derelict buildings in a forlorn corner of Brooklyn known as DUMBO (Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass) and offered space to artists for free -- but only so that they could serve as settlers in cultural outposts until he was ready to convert the spaces to high-end residential use."

NYC is such a cultural wasteland.


"Examples include the Toronto Fashion Incubator, created in 1986..."

Since 1986? I'd love to know of any commercially successful, internationally recognized designers that have come out of this.


"Commissioned by Premier Dalton McGuinty and Toronto Mayor David Miller, the report is the product of 18 months' work by a special team led by Gertler that included representatives from business, non-profit and arts communities."

Are taxpayers footing the bill for this nonesense?
 
Just about every industry is 'creative', but certainly not as sexy as the ones mentioned above. Why do clueless bureaucrats continue to favour certain economic sectors over others? Instead of writing reports that preach to the converted that ultimately achieve nothing, it would be far more beneficial to lower capital taxes to unleash entrepreneurial creativity our society is capable of.
 
blixa:

Just about every industry is 'creative', but certainly not as sexy as the ones mentioned above. Why do clueless bureaucrats continue to favour certain economic sectors over others? Instead of writing reports that preach to the converted that ultimately achieve nothing, it would be far more beneficial to lower capital taxes to unleash entrepreneurial creativity our society is capable of.

That ignores the reality that some industries are ultimately not appropriate or competitive within the city. It'd make no sense for example to favour heavy industries within the city when resources could be better focused upon the knowledge sector. Lowering capital taxes indiscriminantly would do nothing to "unleash" entrerpreneurial creativity if taxation isn't the greatest limiting factor for those sectors in the first place.

AoD
 
Now if only the city could utilize the creativity in the city to finally come up with a compelling advertising campaign.
 
Stench of taxes being wasted
Dreamers ignore our real needs
By JOE WARMINGTON

They can just smell the money. Or is that just urine?

They call it Imagine a Toronto ... Strategies for a Creative City. "An odyssey," is how John Honderich, special adviser on the future of the GTA, described the process.

There are other words to describe the study, which made stops in London, Barcelona and Berlin. We are in for a "creative decade," I guess.

In between gunshots.

"In today's world, creativity is a necessity -- a must-have, not a nice to have," muses Pier Giorgio Di Cicco, Toronto's poet laureate. "There is a direct link between a flourishing city and the vitality of its creative sector. Toronto is on the cusp of a creative breakthrough."

But how are these "artistes" going to get Frenchie, the homeless guy, off the corner of College and Yonge. Hard to "imagine" a Toronto without him.

About $300,000 was promised on the Imagine study -- commissioned by our left-leaning mayor and premier. Now you know where some of your police helicopter money was spent. We don't have one of those. But at least we have a poet laureate.

They want creativity. Perhaps they should start by commissioning an artist to create a statue of slain Jane Creba or fellow murder victims Const. Billy Hancox or Const. Todd Baylis. Or the hundreds of others. We are into 40 homicides in 2006 and counting.

But still there they all were at the slick non-profit MaRs Theatre, on College, not far from Frenchie and the reality of the city the "thinkers" don't seem want to see. "Creativity owns imagination," writes the poet. "The imagination that comes of that allegiance is powerful, self renewing, and tireless in delight."

Huh? I'd take the helicopter. I'd take stiffer sentences for violent criminals and a city where our police officers aren't fighting tooth and nail for a 3% raise from a city council who seem hell bent on giving themselves 7%.

This room was full of all your usual self-congratulatory, grant-seeking leftists. We need dreamers like this but let them pay for it. The regular citizen is busted. There's no fancy words needed to express it. They know it costs $25 to park downtown, $2.75 to ride the subway. They know rush hour and break-ins and panhandlers. They don't have to imagine it. It's not an Odyssey. It's called any day.

Nebulous and murky are two words that come to mind to describe the slick booklet they handed out.

"Expand creative programming for youth" was the No. 1 "opportunity" listed. Others included "transforming local community centres into creative community hubs;" "advance Toronto as a centre of design;" "develop a creativity/innovation convergence centre;" "provide affordable and stable creative space systematically;" "a support design review panel" and "develop new infrastructure dedicated to connecting and promoting a creative Toronto."

Okay. As long as it is not on my tax bill.

Turns out not everything was vague.

"Provide ongoing, stable funding for creative projects."

I understand what that means. I think they are talking about taxpayers' money there.

This think-tank of geniuses was chaired by former Toronto Star publisher Honderich -- who Mayor David Miller proudly said works for $1 a year. You get what you pay for. Good thing we didn't have to pay $1 for every buzz-word used. Or maybe we did.

"Connectivity" was one, "forged alliance" was another. How about "flash inspiration," "innovation," "collective vision, forward thinking or dedicated thinkers."

Miller talked of the city basking in "self-rejoicing" and our citizens should be "busy loving our city." How's that waterfront redevelopment coming? Or the train to the airport? Where's that aquarium for the fish, or super film studio or even the Loblaws in Maple Leaf Gardens?

Where's the solution to the Gardiner Expressway or the Don Valley Parkway? How about the enormous debt of the city?

I smell another report.

Meanwhile, the "brains" at the top want a creative world-class city but they don't seem to have a plan for the street guy harassing the tourists for money or walking down the street with a bottle of urine. And what about the gangs?

Maybe we can turn them all into artists and creative thinkers. Ask them yourselves. No trip to Barcelona necessary. You'll find them in any city park. And let's not forget Frenchie, the friendly homeless guy who is not part of Toronto's dream but is part of its reality.

"I am not leaving, that would suck," he says. "I am part of the culture of the city."

He didn't show up in the study which Mayor Miller says "fosters a culture of innovation." Frenchie must have slipped through the cracks somewhere between Berlin and London. What's that aroma?

Could it be the stench of the ink going on another cheque from a taxpayer? Perhaps. But it's probably just the urine.
 
I don't really care for the left / right battles in this or any country but I must say that that previous article was one of the more bitter tirades I have read representing some of the worst traits in the human character. Hate, spite, jealousy, envy etc. What is the source? I can't see any paper but the Sun publishing something of that kind.

"It'd make no sense for example to favour heavy industries within the city when resources could be better focused upon the knowledge sector."

I agree GB only to an extent. I think we have shifted too far the other way however. The key in my mind is diversity of industry sectors. A region denuded of it's heavy industry is also weakened even if they have the top knowledge industries in the world. It is inevitable that that lack of diversification will come to haunt you down the road.
 
That article is not attributed to a publication but I suspect it must be the Sun. What other paper would set up the false binary choice between crime prevention (and that old right-wing favourite the police helicopter) and a report on creativity? Funny when they talk about police issues it is never framed as "taxpayer dollars".
 
That damned helicopter, scouring the sleepy avenues of Riverdale for rogues at 3 a.m., waking me as I lie with the screen door open. Then back to sleep for an hour or two, until the dawn chorus strikes. ( What birds are they? Such loud, exotic cries I imagine I'm in the tropics ).
 
I agree with the article. Not necessarily about 'helicopters', per se, but about the questionable spending of finances on ridiculous 'make-work-for-bureaucrats" policies; all the more so in a city that is always claiming it's broke and cannot afford the sorts of basic things its citizens are demanding, i.e. waterfront, safe streets, clean streets, etc. The arts that are relevent flourish organically, always have and always will.
 
The City has a website ( "How Your Tax Dollar Will Work For You In 2006 ) that breaks down where they spend our property taxes. Their "average house with an assessed value of $369,300" isn't that far shy of my own.

Of the 28 categories listed, Police Service & Board gobbles up $503.61 of my money and is by far the largest. Social Services comes in at $I85.44, and Shelter, Support & Housing Administration at $184.36, just behind Debt Charges, TTC and Fire.

I don't see the dreaded word Arts listed anywhere. Maybe it is buried in "Other" at the end?
 

Back
Top