ARG1
Senior Member
Why are we judging how well an elevated line would do based off infrastructure from the early 20th century? We have so many cities like Vancouver, Paris, Tokyo, and others that have built modern elevated metro systems that do not suffer from the noisiness or lack of speed that NYC and Chicago do, and we should be looking at those systems, not NYC which suffers from being extremely behind on maintenance and vital infrastructure upkeep work.Chicago and New York are good example of elevated Metro Line as well how close and noisy they are to buildings as well being slow. The lines were built over narrow streets that did not allow for centre of the road support compare to the wide Sheppard Rd that would.
If I shoot Sheppard like I did in 2009 12 years ago, you will see very little in the way of new development to support the need for a subway over an LRT. There are a few new towers between 404 and Kennedy with a few on the board to be built like the plaza redevelopment at Kennedy that is still not enough for a subway.
The plan for the Sheppard LRT was to tunnel under the 404 and surface at Consumer as an LRT and using the south or north track at Don Mills platforms. You are far better off keeping it as a subway to Victoria Park where the LRT is on the surface and a new bus terminal are.