innsertnamehere
Superstar
It won't be faster, especially mid day. Mid day, my bus zooms into the GO bus terminal from the DVP, while it would otherwise be forced through several stoplights instead. I support improvement, but without a loss of lanes.
I'm not concerned by that. Various other cities around the continent have removed/reduced urban freeways without it harming traffic. Drivers found new routes (often faster than the old route), property values increased and everyone was happy.
The congestion we see on the Gardiner appears to be a symptom of induced demand.
I'm not concerned by that. Various other cities around the continent have removed/reduced urban freeways without it harming traffic. Drivers found new routes (often faster than the old route), property values increased and everyone was happy.
The congestion we see on the Gardiner appears to be a symptom of induced demand.
It's unfortunate that the Gardiner was built where it was - north of downtown would've made a lot more sense - but it is far too late to change the location now.
If Toronto is a world-class city that thinks big, then replacing the Gardiner with a new elevated expressway would be my personal choice.
I can only see that happening with massive provincial and federal support though, and the Gardiner can't wait forever for a solution...
Thats the 1 thing, and the only thing, that Hudak has right. The Gardiner, DVP, Allen, Lincoln Alexander, and Red Hill Expressway should all be uploaded. (as well as any other municipal expressways that I am forgetting about)
If it was built north of downtown, many established neighbourhoods would have been demolished, just like with the spadina expressway. Ramming a highway through Rosedale or the Annex would have been deeply regrettable. Meanwhile, the Gardner's existing location was once an industrial wasteland so it was easier to build it there, and the industry needed a highway to serve it.
Today's Star suggests Gardiner east of York should be dismantled completely without much complications to traffic. Makes perfect sense to me. All the "what about the traffic without the Gardiner" worry is really unnecessary, especially when the pros obviously outweighs the cons by a factor of 10.
I like this part "Shanghai put its waterfront expressway underground and built 12 new subway lines, feats that would take us 400 years of environmental assessments and community consultations, never mind construction. The Chinese say matter-of-factly that these “are obviously good things to do.” Why can’t we see that?". - an underground expressway and 12 subway lines will indeed take us 400 years.
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/comm...the_gardiner_expressway_a_costly_mistake.html
Why do I get the feeling that the people proposing to tear down the gardiner east are looking at historical traffic data without taking into account the thousands upon thousands of residents that are slated to move into the area without any transit (or at least no concrete funding for transit). Does anybody know if the traffic impact studies take into account projected growth in the area?
The primary purpose of the Gardiner is for suburbanites to get in/out of downtown. Downtowners couldn't care less about it. So how much growth there will be doesn't seem that important.




