News   Jan 26, 2026
 468     2 
News   Jan 26, 2026
 805     0 
News   Jan 26, 2026
 533     0 

Renovating Toronto

G

ganjavih

Guest
Renovating Toronto

Mismatched furniture, peeling paint, dowdy style. What's a city to do? Call for contracts to refurbish the streets. Think designer makeover.
Jul. 9, 2006. 08:27 AM
JENNIFER WELLS

Raise high the roofbeams, ladies and gents, the great city reno is about to begin. Within a matter of weeks city council intends to issue a so-called RFP, or request for proposal, that will result in a host of savvy companies from around the globe bidding on Toronto's 20-year street furniture contract.

Never heard of street furniture? Well, you will. Imagine a transformation of Toronto streets into a co-ordinated landscape of litter bins and newsracks and toilettes and more that we, the people, actually like.

Or so we hope.

The jockeying for profile among the competing companies has already commenced. Recently spotted roaming the streets of downtown Toronto: Toulla Constantinou, chief executive officer, North America, for Cemusa, headquartered in Spain.

It was Constantinou who led the Cemusa team in its successful bid for the New York City street furniture contract. The company, dare we say, is feeling chuffed and confident.

"They have no commonality and most of them are dysfunctional," says Constantinou of the pieces currently plopped around our not-so-fair city. She clucks disapprovingly over the state of a litter bin, mutters about the paint peeling from a light post and seems in a state of near shock as she balefully stares at a mass of metal newspaper boxes.

It is true, our house is a mess. Constantinou figures she can fix it. "You can count us in," she says of the Toronto bid.

Among other likely contenders: JCDecaux of France, represented by Francois Nion, the company's executive vice-president for North America, who, these days, is spending most of his time right here in our town. "Toronto is one of those few world-class cities," he says. "For a company like us it is very important. So we are paying a lot of attention and most likely we will bid, but we need to see the RFP document."

Street furniture wins for Decaux include Chicago, Barcelona and, recently, New Delhi.

About the pending competition, Clear Channel, based in the U.S., is saying ... very little. "Clear Channel is not going to be public about our intentions," says Alan High, vice-president, operations and marketing for Clear Channel Outdoor Canada (think Dundas Square.) "We haven't become the biggest by talking about it."

All right then.

How the eventual arrangement will work: The vendor will install and maintain the furniture pieces at no cost to the city. In exchange, the city will authorize the vendor to sell attached advertising, with a percentage of those revenues directed back to city coffers.

Robert Freedman, director of urban design for the city's planning division, explains the vision. "People are used to thinking of streets as conduits, how to get from A to B," he says. "I think when you hear urban designers and landscape architects talk about the street, they want to talk about the space that is created within a street, with the buildings on either side acting as walls to help contain the space. If you continue with that kind of analogy, which is the street as a room, well, rooms are furnished."

Ergo, street furniture.

But what, oh what, do we want our shared public space to look like? "We're looking for something that conveys you're in Toronto," says Andy Koropeski, director of transportation services for the city. Koropeski is overseeing the entire project and reflects upon concerns that have been raised thus far.

Consider: homogeneity. "That concern has definitely been raised," he says, adding that the competing companies will ultimately have an opportunity to express neighbourhood individuation in their pitches. Think different colours, or possibly "attachments" of some sort that would signify, say, Little Italy.

Are you excited yet?

The largest companies in this game align themselves with high-profile architects. Think Philippe Starck and Norman Foster (Decaux), or Nicholas Grimshaw and Oscar Niemeyer (Cemusa). Hey. Wouldn't a local designer be grand?

Constantinou speaks optimistically about the exercise upon which we, collectively, have embarked. "I don't think we should deny that we want to live in places that are beautiful," she says. "You can't give up that dream. As a human being you shouldn't give up on that dream."
 
I'll bet anyone that Clearchannel is going to win it. They will come in the cheapest and thats all thats going to matter in the end.

The others are just there to make it look less scripted.
 
This is great news and long overdue. I'm surprised it hasn't elicited much interest here. I guess we tend to prefer to drool over large buildings rather than get excited about what is happening in our streets. This will go a long way in branding or adding a distinctive and recognizable element to the city. Some unity in design will also provide a much needed element of homogeneity to our sprawling mess of a beautiful city. It also sounds like the deal struck will allow Toronto to pick the proposal it wants regardless of cost as it is the bidder who will foot the bill for the furniture and installation. I look forward to hearing more about this.
 
Question: What are they going to do with the great new bus shelters?
 
Cemusa's street furniture for New York, designed by Nicholas Grimshaw...

060523grimshaw1.jpg


060523grimshaw2.jpg


060523grimshaw3.jpg


Personally I hope JC Decaux wins the bid, since I am most familiar with their advertising and furniture (through looking at their designs in books and checking out what they did in Hong Kong).
 
Toronto to crack down on illegal billboards

Toronto city council is taking a hard line on billboards, wall murals and other forms of outdoor advertising it says are running afoul of the city’s sign bylaw.

On Wednesday, councillor Kyle Rae summoned representatives from many of the city’s outdoor advertising companies–ranging in size from major businesses like Pattison Outdoor and CBS Outdoor Canada (formerly Viacom Outdoor) to smaller outfits like Abcon Media and WestPalm Media–to a meeting at City Hall, where he informed them that the city plans to crack down on what he says are “hundreds†of signs in the downtown core that don’t conform to the municipal code.

“I said ‘We’re going to have to start regulating you, because you have failed to regulate yourselves as an industry,’ â€says Rae. “ ‘So I would advise you to start regulating yourselves.’ â€

Rae, who one outdoor vendor calls “a great proponent of third-party advertising,†says outdoor signage has been a long-simmering issue, both for himself and constituents in his Toronto Centre-Rosedale riding. “The public feels there’s been an enormous proliferation of signs,†says Rae, “and from a city council point of view, I would say there’s been an enormous proliferation of illegality–there are many signs that have popped up over the last few years that have no permits.â€

Pressed for specific examples, Rae cited an Abcon Media mural on a Hospital for Sick Children building in downtown Toronto that “just went up without any permission.†The wrap has since been removed, says Rae.

Abcon president and CEOLes Abro–who claims Rae has a “vendetta†against his company–says permission for the space has been sought “many times. We’ve put in many applications.†The applications, he says, were turned down for a variety of reasons: “Wrong size, the wrong whatever.â€

But Rae stressed that it’s not just one company in violation of city bylaws. The councillor went on to paint an almost Wild West scenario, with outdoor companies of varying sizes routinely erecting or amending existing signs in contravention of the municipal code.

“The (outdoor)owners are saying (to property owners) ‘I can give you this much for putting a sign up on the side of your building’ and it goes up without any permit through the city,†says Rae. “Some of the big ones are doing it, the small ones are doing it, the newcomers are doing it.â€

Calls to outdoor vendor Clear Channel Outdoor, as well as Out-of-home Marketing Association of Canada president Rosanne Caron, were not returned by press time.

Jorg Cieslok, senior vice-president/general manager for Toronto’s Titan Worldwide–a company that specializes in large-format ads–says the signage companies are catering to their clients’ appetites for larger ads, but admits there has been a proliferation of signs that don’t conform to city bylaws, some belonging to his company.

“There are companies that have been successful in obtaining variance applications to get a sign permitted that is of a minor variance-meaning a little bit larger than what the law allows right now,†says Cieslok. “Then there are companies, and it’s really and truly everybody, there’s no singling out one company–some do more, some do less–(erecting) non-permitted signs or putting up signs without a permit at all.â€

Cieslok says his own company has already identified about nine locations throughout the city that it plans to remove, although it’s hoping to do so once existing contracts with advertising clients expire. “We will be proposing to remove them over time, not a very long time, as to not damage any relationships with any of the clients that may be affected.â€

However, Cieslok stresses that the problem is not endemic to the outdoor advertising industry, pointing to the numerous condo developments that feature 60- or 80-foot high vinyl banners promoting the building. “This is not only concerning third-party advertising,†he says. “This is about the sign bylaw–which includes first-party and third-party advertising.â€

Rae says that he’s urging city council to consider a “renewal system†that would limit the amount of time a company can hold a sign permit. He says the permit length could vary according to the type of sign it governs. For instance, a large-scale digital sign that requires more money to build, could have a longer permit than a standard wall mural.

–Chris Powell
 
I'll bet anyone that Clearchannel is going to win it. They will come in the cheapest and thats all thats going to matter in the end.
I'm pretty sure the article says this won't cost the City anything. Actually, it should provide some funds to the City from advertising revenues.
 
I"ll bet you the Public Space Committee will spin this in a way that'll make it look like the city is paying for it.
 
Street facelift plan in gear
Proposals sought for 2007 program
`Street furniture' to be renewed
Sep. 11, 2006. 06:10 AM
JOHN SPEARS
CITY HALL BUREAU

Think of 2007 as the year Toronto starts to get a facelift.

For good or ill, the city has launched a call for proposals from companies willing to bid on the massive job of replacing every bus shelter, garbage bin, bike rack, newspaper box and street bench in the city.

For good measure, they'll have to throw in 2,500 postering kiosks and 20 public washrooms.

The long-awaited request for proposals for the 20-year deal was formally issued Friday, setting off a contest that's scheduled to culminate with the city awarding a contract next summer.

To the winner goes the obligation to supply all the objects that sit on public streets — known in City Hall as "street furniture" — coupled with the reward of selling advertising on some of them.

Marketing magazine estimates the value of the advertising over the term of the deal at up to $500 million.

To the city goes a minimum payment of $6 million annually, although municipal officials predict the actual payments could be triple that. The city also gets the right to use 7 per cent of the advertising space free for its purposes. Free space must also be provided to local Business Improvement Areas.

Submissions by individual companies or consortia must be in to the city by Jan. 10.

Because of the scale of the project, the would-be suppliers are given a schedule over the 20-year period for installing the new items.

How much advertising should be allowed on city streets was hotly debated in council before politicians decided to issue the request for proposals in June.

Councillor Janet Davis is disappointed that the document only stipulates that the amount of advertising allowed under the deal will be "no greater than" what's currently on the street, as measured in square metres.

"I certainly had hoped that we would see less advertising than we have now," says Davis (Ward 31, Beaches-East York).

Physical specifications for other objects are also strict:

#
"The height of all openings for waste and recyclables shall not exceed 1,065 mm." (That's 106.5 centimetres or 42 inches).

#
Litter openings should be on the "pedestrian side of the container." (This addresses a criticism of the experimental "mega-bins" that had waste-container openings on the curbside, forcing pedestrians to step into the street gutter to put something in the bin.)

#
Containers must be "versatile" so they can be stand-alone bins, or function with a transit shelter.

#
"The container must prevent vermin from entering."

Interestingly, in light of the fierce debate over mega-bins, the specifications don't appear to set maximum overall size limits. They simply mention "a larger version for high litter areas and a smaller unit for less busy areas." The large version must contain three bins, each able to hold 120 litres, and the smaller version two bins.
 
I'll bet anyone that Clearchannel is going to win it. They will come in the cheapest and thats all thats going to matter in the end.

Jayomatic, this is one competition that will have little to do with money. The city will spent $0 on this street furniture so the best contender will win, not the one who costs the city the least money.
 
These deals are usually based upon who offers the city the biggest cut of the ad revenue. So sadly, I think it still comes down to money.
 
In fact, I would imagine that our new "accountability era" would more-or-less require the city to pick the company that promises the most money, regardless of the aesthetic merits of its proposal.
 

Back
Top