Richard White
Senior Member
Also, you have Russian plants like Hungary inside
That may change in April.
Also, you have Russian plants like Hungary inside
I read in the G&M this morning that the world’s demand and use of coal has never been higher.It might not happen in this century because you still have large parts of the developing world struggling to even get to the full array of fossil fuel-driven industries we have in the West in their quest for development. Just replacing coal with natural gas for power generation and industry will be a challenge in many parts of the world, including Florida apparently.
Politics is downstream of culture. The culture that led to Orban and co being in power for that long hasn't gone a way. Both the EU and NATO are fundamentally flawed that they can't boot members that no longer share the same values.That may change in April.
Politics is downstream of culture. The culture that led to Orban and co being in power for that long hasn't gone a way. Both the EU and NATO are fundamentally flawed that they can't boot members that no longer share the same values.
This "erosion of our civil liberties" was written into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms from its inception. The notwithstanding clause is the loophole that Trudeau Sr. left in the Charter. What would you have Carney do? Initiate a constitutional reform over this?this erosion to our civil liberties is happening under Carney's Canada.
Politics is downstream of culture. The culture that led to Orban and co being in power for that long hasn't gone a way. Both the EU and NATO are fundamentally flawed that they can't boot members that no longer share the same values.
It's an unintended consequence of the notwithstanding clause. I don't think they figured governments would use it like this. However, it's obvious that it should never have been included, or at least had far more restrictions (such as being subject to judicial review. However it was put in place to skirt court decisions)This "erosion of our civil liberties" was written into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms from its inception. The notwithstanding clause is the loophole that Trudeau Sr. left in the Charter. What would you have Carney do? Initiate a constitutional reform over this?
It's an unintended consequence of the notwithstanding clause. I don't think they figured governments would use it like this. However, it's obvious that it should never have been included, or at least had far more restrictions (such as being subject to judicial review. However it was put in place to skirt court decisions)
There are plenty of levers to pull. Giving Alberta a blank cheque on pipelines as a reward is certainly not one of those.This "erosion of our civil liberties" was written into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms from its inception. The notwithstanding clause is the loophole that Trudeau Sr. left in the Charter. What would you have Carney do? Initiate a constitutional reform over this?
I get that...I am just saying this so that we are aware and not to take anything for granted here. And most certainly, speak up against it...whether you are the PM or a lowly person like me.This "erosion of our civil liberties" was written into the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms from its inception. The notwithstanding clause is the loophole that Trudeau Sr. left in the Charter. What would you have Carney do? Initiate a constitutional reform over this?
Quebec’s Bill 21 is very popular with Quebecers. To Quebec’s government, it’s not considered an unreasonable imposition to leave your religious garb at home when you’re working in the public sector. You can still believe in, and privately observe whatever version of sky cake you want. I can’t see Quebec backing down at all.Supreme Court is supposed to review Quebec's Bill 21 soon.
How could Ottawa enforce that? And is the freedom to wear religious garb really the hill to die on for Carney's government?The Federal government could also maybe override with Disallowance, if they had the guts. It might spark a small crisis.
Considering that the religious garb in question is the literal physical embodiment of women's oppression by the religion that forces it upon them - a symbol of patriarchy, coercion and restriction that women in that religion have to deal with on a daily basis - I wouldn't publicly touch Bill 21 with a ten foot pole. Whichever side of the argument you fall on with that bill, you will catch a ton of flack.How could Ottawa enforce that? And is the freedom to wear religious garb really the hill to die on for Carney's government?




