picard102
Senior Member
In fact there are groups wantting Canada to bring in 100 million in 10 years.
Are they credible groups that have any chance of succeeding, or just another fringe group looking to do X?
In fact there are groups wantting Canada to bring in 100 million in 10 years.
Who? Random people on facebook? There is no organization in Canada calling for this.In fact there are groups wantting Canada to bring in 100 million in 10 years.
I see people being critical of Trudeau for not commenting on the US election results. Why though? Jagmeet Singh will likely never be PM, so he has the chance to be critical of Trump. Meanwhile, the PM needs to work with whoever gets elected.
I see people being critical of Trudeau for not commenting on the US election results. Why though? Jagmeet Singh will likely never be PM, so he has the chance to be critical of Trump. Meanwhile, the PM needs to work with whoever gets elected.
I don't know, normally one should try to be as diplomatic as possible, but going soft on an insane sociopath like Trump only adds to the impression that a lot of people have of Trudeau that he's spineless.
I don't know, normally one should try to be as diplomatic as possible, but going soft on an insane sociopath like Trump only adds to the impression that a lot of people have of Trudeau that he's spineless.
Loni Eliot
shared a link.
3tSp3gio onsmoctrinestisd ·
MY VIEW:
Let me get this off my chest - the definition for 'Family' for MPs has got to be clarified. Exactly what is family? Husband/Wife? Obviously. Children living at home? For sure. How about Grandparents living on their own? Siblings living alone? Nieces and Nephews? Cousins? And also, when is a Family Friend not a Family Friend? Let's have a very clear definition of 'Family'.
In this case, Yasmin Ratansi had hired her biggest supporter, her sister, to work in her constituency office and not her MP office in Ottawa. At the time, that was not illegal. But Ratansi's mistake was when, after 2012 under Stephen Harper, when the rules were changed and with no grandfathering, she should have fired her sister. Not because her sister wasn't doing her job, there's no indication of that, but simply because the rules had changed and no exceptions were allowed. That was when Ratansi made the biggest mistake of her life by trying to cover up the fact that her sister was still employed at the constituency office and that she required her other staff to cover it up as well. That was totally wrong of Ratansi.... perhaps understandable since her sister may or may not, be dependent on her job and she herself had not done anything wrong up to that point in time. I don't know if Ratansi had any political avenues to pursue in her case in support of her sister's employment but I've heard nothing to indicate that she may have even tried.
So now Ratansi's career may well be over for good and her sister is no longer employed and may in fact, also have become unemployable. Such a shame and such a mess.
But, it would seem that there's a little bit of hypocrisy from the ReformaCONs on this as Pierre Pollivieve's wife was hired to work in Coopers office to get around this so-called nepotism, and it isn't illegal - just morally wrong which the CONs don't really care about. And now we hear about others including Harper's son who is now working for Jason Kenney in his inner circle, with no experience other than being Harper's son and is now making around $100,000/year under Kenney in Alberta. Again, not illegal just morally wrong.
But the ReformaCONs are very good at pointing fingers but doing some twisted end runs around legislation or rules for themselves and theirs.