60% wanted a tunnel under Sparks? Good.... Good....
60% wanted a tunnel under Sparks? Good.... Good....
The STO has been pretty clear that they have no intention of asking Ottawa to pay for any part of it.Ontario and Ottawa residents sure as heck won't pay for it
IIRC the Quebec government has already "promised" to fund 60% of it.They may want the Quebec government to pitch in 60%
Haha I was just about to post that.
Wait till you see where the Trillium line is getting extended to! The western extension has fewer 'cornfields' than the southern one. At one point, it will literally go down a dirt road.Is that rendering accurate? LRT through cornfields?
For Torontonians unfamiliar with the NCR, yes, Ottawa established a green belt way back when and it's mostly still green. Of course the suburbs jumped across it. Ottawa has been reasonably successful in getting suburbanites to commute on transit and they need to be kept willing. You can't compare the situation either to Toronto or other millionish Canadian cities, because none is configured the same way. Existing railway lines are all in the wrong place and don't go into the core, so the LRT is being built to play the role of "subway" backbone within the green belt, and of commuter rail without. So it runs past fields, pastures, parkland, bogs, whatever looks green on a satellite map.Is that rendering accurate? LRT through cornfields?
Is that rendering accurate? LRT through cornfields?