Sometimes I think, yeah, sure, two signs. Build a tougher one that will withstand the climbing for longer, then move this one around and put it in harder-to-reach spots…
and then I think, nope, there really should only be one because I still believe what I said many posts back: people get bored when things stay the same for a long time, and I think you have a better chance of making a BIG DEAL out of this one sign by taking it away occasionally.
Leave them wanting more, as they say.
…and then when I read absolutely emphatic comments that this sign cannot be moved, that we cannot possibly do without it, I think, 'how did we ever become this great city without this sign?' Well, we did. Toronto does not depend upon this sign. Yes, it's terrific, but if anyone is going to wrap up the whole value of the city into this one sign, I just think 'what short memories' and 'get some perspective'. I'm not trying to be harsh, I just think people are going a bit overboard on this.
All that said, I'm happy to contribute to the cult of the sign, all praise the sign…
42