News   May 15, 2024
 1.2K     0 
News   May 15, 2024
 1.5K     0 
News   May 15, 2024
 995     1 

Metrolinx: New GO and/or Regional Bus Terminal at 45 Bay

I'm really enjoying the resurgence of this thread! I've been trying to learn as much as I can about the intercity bus industry, and I'd like to write my final research project (Ryerson planning undergrad; I'm sure there are a lot of you around) about Ontario's bus regulatory framework. I could go on a big rant about the direction that I want to take my research, but instead, I'll just say this: By and large, Ontario's intercity bus industry isn't nearly as functional as it could be. Buses are cramped and dirty, prices are high relative to similar routes in other jurisdictions, and stations are boring at best. I believe this stems, in part, from the system of regulation, which grants bus operators monopolies, without asking much in return. We can do better.

ANYWAY, as a Ryerson student who grew up in Ottawa, I travel between the two cities quite often. I live an 8 minute walk from the Toronto Coach Terminal, so I have a vested interest in it staying where it is. But the logical part of my brain tells me that the station is cramped, poorly maintained, and, of course there's the bus garage. I've probably lost a few years of my life from exhaust inhalation in that building alone. By and large, If you can avoid this station, you will. And that's a problem. You can travel to almost any other country in the world to see what bus travel could be. http://www.greyhounduk.com/ has 41" seat pitch, which is more than Air Canada's executive class - and they don't charge more than a couple of pounds for any trip. Although the Victoria Coach Station in London is by no means a great place, at least they queue indoors.

All of this to say that Toronto needs a new bus terminal. And it needs to be at Union Station. The old portion of the existing Coach Terminal should be preserved as a historic landmark, but the rest of that space (and the parking lots across the street) should be intensively redeveloped.

And its replacement? There really isn't that much developable space around Union left. The only real option left is this: http://maps.google.ca/maps?f=q&sour....644098,-79.377363&spn=0.001097,0.002411&z=19

Who says a bus station can't have a big, triumphant atrium? There's no reason a bus terminal development on that lot can't pay for itself. As in many cities around the world, a station could be part of a larger building involving retail space, commercial space, and underground parking. Think the Stockholm bus station - but on a grander scale - maybe more like a modern Michigan Central Station.
HFBW000Z.jpg

4333431780_d8ca8b3de9.jpg


It can be connected to Union, the PATH, and the existing GO Terminal. It can have indoor waiting and queuing areas, so that people can ride the bus with as much dignity as possible.

And why don't we take it a step further? Why not have right-in right-out bus-only ramps from the Westbound Gardiner directly into the terminal - like a cheaper version of the Port Authority Bus Terminal's connection to the Lincoln Tunnel?

Even without the dedicated ramps, this would cut bus travel times by between 5 and 15 minutes for every single trip to and from Toronto. It would mean much easier access to the subway, especially for those that are schlepping loads of luggage. It would mean MUCH easier connections with both GO and VIA, which will benefit 905ers and visitors alike. Once the Blue22 is or isn't built, it'll mean incredibly fast (although expensive) connections to the airport from anywhere in Ontario. If the Downtown Relief Line is ever built, that bulks up the node even more.

As you can imagine, I could rant about this forever - but I think I've made my point. What are everyone's thought about the intercity bus industry and this specific terminal? Have any especially good bus experiences abroad? I'm here to learn!

Union Station is the obvious location for any new bus terminal. I have a copy of an old study that talked about a much-expanded two level terminal on the existing GO Bus terminal site. That's probably ideal, though it might be a little congested.
That said, there are some advantages to the existing location. I know a lot of people--especially U of T students--who prefer the bus over the train because the bus is walking distance to campus (among other destinations) while you pretty much have to spend on TTC to get down to Union.

unimaginative2, I would reaally, really love to get a hold of that study. Do you have in in PDF or on paper?
 
I noticed today that Can-Ar bus lines has begun using the Union GO bus terminal for some trips. Isn't this a private company? Were they squeezed out of the Bay St terminal?
 
I noticed today that Can-Ar bus lines has begun using the Union GO bus terminal for some trips. Isn't this a private company? Were they squeezed out of the Bay St terminal?

As a way of earning extra revenue GO is renting out space to private bus companies. Some casino buses also depart from Unionville GO on the weekends. Can-Ar must have felt it was a better deal and moved to Union.
 
As a way of earning extra revenue GO is renting out space to private bus companies. Some casino buses also depart from Unionville GO on the weekends. Can-Ar must have felt it was a better deal and moved to Union.

I wouldn't mind more private bus lines using Union GO bus terminal, provided they expanded it.
 
Bumping this thread to reflect discussions of 45 Bay St on Projects and Construction
http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showth...Transit-CofToronto-Feds-48s-Wilkinson-Eyre)/y

If an intercity coach terminal were built as part of this development and the Bay-Dundas terminal closed, would that have clearance issues for Megabus or other/future double deck operators, with a primary and alternate route available in east and west directions? It would also be interesting to see what would happen to the facility fee charged at the current TCT, depending on who would operate the new facility and how operating it would be funded.
 
If an intercity coach terminal were built as part of this development and the Bay-Dundas terminal closed, would that have clearance issues for Megabus or other/future double deck operators, with a primary and alternate route available in east and west directions? It would also be interesting to see what would happen to the facility fee charged at the current TCT, depending on who would operate the new facility and how operating it would be funded.
Where would there be issues for double deckers? Surely moving the terminal to the south of the rail corridor would elminate the need to run double deckers through what I thought was the tightest point (the rail corridor).
 
Wasn't sure what route Megabus currently take so didn't want to assume there would be no issue.
 
If heading west they go down universirty , east they go along Gerrard. Essentially the fastest way to the DVP/Gardiner. Having the terminal right beside the Gardiner will save a lot of time and make going north of the rail corridor unnecessary.
 
If heading west they go down universirty , east they go along Gerrard. Essentially the fastest way to the DVP/Gardiner. Having the terminal right beside the Gardiner will save a lot of time and make going north of the rail corridor unnecessary.
I knew I had seen one or two around River St area but didn't want to commit to Gerrard or Dundas in case I got which one it was wrong :cool:
 
Bumping this thread to reflect discussions of 45 Bay St on Projects and Construction
http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showth...Transit-CofToronto-Feds-48s-Wilkinson-Eyre)/y

What is everyone's view about a location for the bus terminal...North or South of the tracks?

North of the tracks (where the current GO Bus Terminal is plus the small parking lot directly North of the Bus Terminal) would have to be built on a 2 or 3 story form. The entry/exit ramps may be very ugly if they are not done right. However, it is very close to transit connections (Subway and the rail). Pedestrian access could easily be created. The land is also currently owned by GO and the Federal Government which makes it a bit less costly.

South of the tracks (45 Bay) has benefits that it is a much bigger lot. However, the question arises on how to transfer people from the subway and GO train terminal. . (QQ streetcar goes under Bay St which blocks access). Several hundred meter transfer from the subway.

However, South could be connected directly with on/off ramps to the Gardiner (westbound is relatively simple...eastbound may be more difficult). This would almost elimiate intercity bus traffic on local streets which make this form of travel much quicker.
 
The whole of the bus terminal will be on the south side in the redevelopment. I am 99.99% sure of that, but the .01% doubt meant that in the front page article I had to acknowledge that I have not been told so specifically. It is pretty clear, however, that the south side is where all the buses will be going.

No inside knowledge on the possibility of direct ramps being built from the Gardiner, but again, I am 99.99% certain that they will not be. This is because 1) it would not be as simple as adding a new ramps, as on-ramp/off-ramp spacing is already tight, and new ramps could only be added if there were to be weaving of new ones around old ones, and 2a) there's no way they would spend the money on that and besides, 2b) the City is not interested in adding any new overhead shadowing in the area. A couple of slender PATH bridges are the only new overhead infrastructure you'll ever see down there.

In regards to better connecting the south side bus terminal to Union Station, well, the terminal is already on the east side of Bay, with underground access already blocked by the LRT tunnel. Overhead, however, there will be a PATH walkway built along the north edge of Union Station over Bay Street to connect developments on either side. Vertical circulation to Bay Street level would be improved. Once you're at Bay, you'll have to walk for a couple of minutes under the tracks.

42
 
I wonder if they will actually excavate underneath the rail corridor and use that space (which isn't good for much else) for the terminal. Probably easier to build access routes?

AoD
 
I wonder if they will actually excavate underneath the rail corridor and use that space (which isn't good for much else) for the terminal. Probably easier to build access routes?
I believe one of the Metrolinx potential plans to expand GO capacity at Union is to build more platforms, under the tracks, east of Bay. Presumably this space is needed for those platforms than a bus terminal. This should be in that study that also presented the option of instead building west of Spadina on Bathurst yard.
 
I believe one of the Metrolinx potential plans to expand GO capacity at Union is to build more platforms, under the tracks, east of Bay. Presumably this space is needed for those platforms than a bus terminal. This should be in that study that also presented the option of instead building west of Spadina on Bathurst yard.

Perhaps, but I think those platforms would run significantly deeper than the ground level space immediately below the existing rail corridor.

AoD
 
Union Station + 45 Bay Bus Terminal Connectivity (LRT Tunnel)

In regards to better connecting the south side bus terminal to Union Station, well, the terminal is already on the east side of Bay, with underground access already blocked by the LRT tunnel. Overhead, however, there will be a PATH walkway built along the north edge of Union Station over Bay Street to connect developments on either side. Vertical circulation to Bay Street level would be improved. Once you're at Bay, you'll have to walk for a couple of minutes under the tracks.

42

Can I ask what LRT Tunnel you refer to here? Do you mean the proposed Lakeshore tunnel running under Union Station?
 

Back
Top