News   Oct 01, 2024
 1.5K     1 
News   Oct 01, 2024
 690     0 
News   Oct 01, 2024
 1.1K     2 

McGuinty finding march of time not so promising

A

Are Be

Guest
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
Mar. 11, 2004. 01:00 AM
McGuinty finding march of time not so promising

IAN URQUHART

In politics, what a difference a year can make.

At the annual Liberal fundraiser in Toronto a year ago, Dalton McGuinty, then the leader of the Opposition, chastised Ernie Eves, then the premier, for making promises he couldn't keep.

"You can't be all things to all people," said McGuinty. "You shouldn't make promises you can't keep. Ernie Eves doesn't seem to understand that."

In the next breath, McGuinty then proceeded to promise 50,000 new spaces in colleges and universities, a tuition freeze, double the number of apprenticeships, a program for high-school drop-outs, a share of the gasoline tax for cities, and 20,000 affordable housing units.

And he promised no increase in personal taxes and a balanced budget. McGuinty said the Liberals could pay for these promises by rooting out "waste" in government, cancelling government ads, scrapping contracts with consultants, eliminating the private school tax credit, and rolling back corporate tax cuts.

"I can keep my promises because I've made tough choices," he said confidently.

Flash forward to this year's Liberal fundraiser — held last night at Toronto's convention centre.

Now that he is in office, government doesn't look so easy to McGuinty.

He has rolled back the corporate tax cuts, cancelled the private school tax credit, and started paring government ads and consultant contracts.

But far from giving him the money to keep his promises, this has made barely a dent in the $5.6 billion deficit he inherited from Eves.

McGuinty noted last night that that deficit is actually understated because it does not include some $2.2 billion in deficits arising from hospitals, children's aid societies, and other public agencies for which the provincial government is responsible.

"All in all, we're in a pretty deep hole," he told his well-heeled audience of 3,100, who had paid $750 each for the privilege.

"Climbing out of this hole is restricting our ability to invest in the future."

For "invest in the future," substitute "keep our promises"

McGuinty repeated some of his campaign promises last night, but he was careful not to quantify them or to say when they would be kept.

Instead, he devoted most of his speech to outlining the problems the government faces as it attempts to rein in spending, especially on the health-care front.

"For the past five years, health-care costs have been rising twice as fast as other provincial spending," he noted with alarm. "That's about an average of 8 per cent a year.

"The fact is we are spending more than ever before. But we're just not getting the results we deserve for our investment."

As a result, he said, hospitals will be reined in with "performance agreements" that will ensure the money is properly spent.

There were also veiled references in the speech to the government's plans to slap tolls on new highways and raise rates on water and electricity.

Even the education sector — McGuinty's highest priority for government spending — did not emerge unscathed.

"We gladly support public education, but we're not going to throw money at it and hope that somehow some of it sticks," he said.

All in all, it was a very sobering speech — for which McGuinty made no apologies.

"I believe leadership should be straightforward, ambitious — and demanding," he said.

Demanding, as in telling people they can't have their cake (increased spending on health care, education, cities, and housing) and eat it, too (no increase in personal taxes).

Too bad he didn't think of that last year, before he made all those promises he is now finding difficult, if not impossible, to keep.

Additional articles by Ian Urquhart

› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.
 
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
Mar. 11, 2004. 01:00 AM
Editorial: McGuinty's pay stub


Bob and weave as they may, politicians can't dodge the responsibility for pay hikes they award themselves.

Mr. Justice Coulter Osborne, Ontario's integrity commissioner, believes Premier Dalton McGuinty and other members of the provincial parliament are entitled to a 2.7 per cent wage hike, effective April 1.

And McGuinty concurs.

Yesterday he called the proposed increase "reasonable" because it lets MPPs keep up with inflation, just.

But if McGuinty believes 2.7 per cent is right for MPPs, how can he possibly oppose a similar across-the-board increase to the public service, despite Ontario's crippling $5.6 billion deficit? Are politicians special?

Maybe in the Premier's mind.

Claiming the province is broke, McGuinty has exhorted doctors, nurses, teachers and public servants to moderate their wage demands. A 2.7 per cent hike would cost the province $1.3 billion or more; money it just can't afford right now. So McGuinty's plea is understandable.

But leadership means leading and, where necessary, by example. Anything else is hypocrisy. Rather than hide behind the integrity commissioner's views, McGuinty should practise the restraint he has been preaching since coming to office.

In view of Ontario's financial crunch, MPPs should be content with something in the range of 1 per cent or 2 per cent, to set an example of austerity for others to follow.

Moreover, McGuinty's adoption of an inflationary yardstick may buy him a bigger boatload of trouble than he imagines. That 2.7 per cent won't begin to cover inflationary losses in the public service over the past decade. Union leaders argue their members have lost far more to inflation and now deserve a catch-up.

How can the Premier disagree?

› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.
 
McGuinty short on ideas for real change

By Murray Campbell

UPDATED AT 1:00 PM EST &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp Thursday, Mar. 11, 2004

Advertisement

Dalton McGuinty has talked a lot about change. First, he asked voters to "choose change" and lately he has talked about "change that's working." He's been less fond of discussing the change that hits you so hard you wonder what day of the week it is.

Certainly, the Ontario Premier is familiar with blows like this, the prime one a $5.6-billion budget deficit he got as a housewarming gift when his government moved in last October. That's why he appealed to Canada's corporate elite last night to give him more time to implement the promises he used to get their votes and their money.

Mr. McGuinty can still talk a good game about an Ontario where students excel, people are healthy, the economy is strong and the subways run on time.

But there is a nostalgic quality to his renderings of the future now. He did not talk of change last night, preferring instead to point out the "challenges" his government faces. He used the word, which politicians prefer over "problems," six times.

"It's going to take all of us, pulling in the same direction to meet our challenges," he said in a speech to the Ontario Liberal Party's largest fundraising event of the year.

"And our challenges are significant."

It was all so different a year ago. At that time, Bay Street had soured on the Progressive Conservative government of Ernie Eves and was willing to give Mr. McGuinty a second look. He drew a standing ovation from a crowd of 1,500 by taunting Mr. Eves to stop trying to buy votes with targeted policies and to call an election. The crowd didn't object to Mr. McGuinty's admission that a Liberal government would roll back corporate tax cuts planned by the Tories.

Last year, there was a sense that Mr. McGuinty was close to the mark when he said Bay Street was "looking for a change."

Last night, with four years to go until the next provincial election, he was hoping the 3,200 people packed into a Toronto convention hall weren't expecting it right away.

"All in all, we're in a pretty deep hole," he said. "Climbing out of this hole -- paying off the past -- is restricting our ability to invest in the future."

But it was a curiously thin message for such a major event. The problems -- challenges -- facing the government as a result of the budget deficit are well known.

It's difficult to know how the government is faring. The Premier believes voters are cutting him some slack but a formal gauge of public opinion isn't available. Pollsters believe it's pointless to survey about Ontario politics because the convulsions of Paul Martin's government have tainted the word "Liberal."

Nonetheless, government officials at Queen's Park have acknowledged that weeks of publicity about delayed or broken election promises has changed the view that many people, including loyal Liberals, have of the government. That's why the Premier used the party's annual meeting in Windsor three weeks ago to rally his troops by telling them of the glories to come.

Last night's speech was intended to marry the gloomy period with the election vision but it gave little hint of the struggle that the government is engaged in over balancing the budget. Voters attending the so-called citizens' dialogue meetings across Ontario in the past month -- Mr. McGuinty is presiding over one tonight in Ottawa -- are being given far more information about the policy choices facing the government than people who paid $750 for dinner last night.

What, for example, is the intended reaction when the Premier suggests "our people work well, they work together and they work hard" or when he asserts that "Ontarians excel?" These are cheap applause lines, not far above the banter about Shania Twain and Mike Weir, designed to make everyone feel good about sharing the planet with rich Ontarians who don't even live here any more.

Mr. McGuinty asked his audience for their help in building new sewers and roads and in delivering clean drinking water. Isn't that what government is supposed to do? He asked them to "refuse to settle for the status quo." Isn't that why he was elected? If so, perhaps he could let us in on how this is accomplished?

mcampbell@globeandmail.ca



© 2004 Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Dalton said today he will consider building more nuclear reactors for energy in Ontario. From toll roads, to selling off assets... and now to building new nuclear plants, I find it funny how he is sounding more like Eves each and every day.
 
I've never been able to see much difference between Liberals and Conservatives, so I don't find it funny at all. Predictable maybe.
 
Yeah, its getting to be like the reps and dems in the States. The only difference is presentation. Ones do it for liberty, justice and the american way, and the others for democracy and human rights (think of the children!), but the end result is the same - you're getting bombed.
 
AreBe: even you know the trick, always wrapping your neo-fascist views in oddly out-of-place phrases like 'stop this war on the poor' and so on. :rollin :rollin :rollin :lol :tup:
 
READ THIS!! FEEL- GOOD STORY !!! :)
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
Mar. 12, 2004. 01:00 AM
Editorial: McGuinty drifts back to Tory past


Premier Dalton McGuinty didn't have much new to say to the 3,100 movers and shakers who shelled out $750 a plate at the Ontario Liberal party's Heritage Dinner this week. And what he did say was anything but liberal.

He told them the $5.6 billion deficit he inherited from Ernie Eves' Conservatives has left Ontario "in a pretty deep hole." Fair enough. And he reminded them that "climbing out of this hole is restricting our ability to invest in the future." That too is true.

But then McGuinty launched into a new theme that left liberal Liberals cringing in their seats.

McGuinty unburdened himself of the view that Ontario school boards and hospitals can't be trusted with the additional funds he claimed they desperately needed just six months ago.

"We gladly support public education, but we're not going to throw money at it and hope that somehow some of it sticks," he said.

"The fact is we are spending more (on health care) than ever before," he continued, echoing an old line in the Mike Harris/Ernie Eves repertoire.

Then McGuinty proceeded to lay blame on hospitals for the problems that continued underfunding has wrought. "We're just not getting the results we deserve for our investment," he told his audience.

All this from a man who campaigned for the premiership telling the voters that public institutions suffered from serious underfunding.

While no one can argue against making shrewd use of tax dollars, McGuinty once passionately argued too few were going into the system.

The Premier now says he has a duty to engage in "straightforward" talk. But he has been anything but straightforward in identifying the source of his problems — the shovel, if you will, that dug the hole he finds himself in.

That shovel was the excessive tax cuts the Tories brought in.

Reversing some of those cuts would be the surest way to put things right. But McGuinty unwisely signed a no-tax-hike pledge with a right-wing lobby during the campaign while at the same time making expensive — and seemingly expendable — promises to fix our hospitals and schools.

If McGuinty has to break a promise, let him explain to Ontarians why his witless pledge to hold the line on taxes is more sacrosanct than his sensible vow to rebuild the school system, health-care system and other public services that make this province a great place.

Instead, McGuinty is beginning to sound like a convert to the Common Sense Revolution, talking about user fees for everything from roads to sewers. This isn't what Ontarians voted for.

› Get 50% off home delivery of the Toronto Star.
FAQs| Site Map| Privacy Policy| Webmaster| Subscribe| My Subscription
Home| GTA| Business| Waymoresports| A&E| Life
Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from www.thestar.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.
 
"McGuinty unburdened himself of the view that Ontario school boards and hospitals can't be trusted with the additional funds he claimed they desperately needed just six months ago.

"We gladly support public education, but we're not going to throw money at it and hope that somehow some of it sticks," he said.

"The fact is we are spending more (on health care) than ever before," he continued, echoing an old line in the Mike Harris/Ernie Eves repertoire.


Then McGuinty proceeded to lay blame on hospitals for the problems that continued underfunding has wrought. "We're just not getting the results we deserve for our investment," he told his audience."



So Dalton has now gone past the point of mimicking Eves, and is beginning to sound like Harris.

Oh well... Howard Hampton warned everyone during the election that this would happen. For his efforts, he was rewarded with a loss of seats by the voting public. He talked the truth... but nobody listened.
 
The NDP will do well in the next election, I think. McGuinty is alienating A LOT of people.
 
Why?
He is doing a much, much better job than I thought he would do!

Teachers, at long last, will no longer have clout! How many bullets left in that chamber? Teachers didn't like Mille so they voted in Peterson, then they voted in Rae, then they voted in Harris, now they voted in , and will turn on, McGuinty. Who's next?
 

Back
Top