News   Jul 26, 2024
 863     0 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 2.3K     2 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 2K     3 

Jarvis St. Gentrification

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
From the Post:

Jarvis renovations bring promise of better days
The 'Mansion District'

Peter Kuitenbrouwer, National Post
Published: Thursday, April 27, 2006

After a hundred years' absence, the WASPs are returning to Jarvis Street.

"Jarvis Street is coming back," enthuses Ric Tremaine, who has restored three heritage mansions just north of Wellesley Street and opened them as the high-end Gloucester Square Inn. "Jarvis Street is on fire."

Other entrepreneurs, too, are opening new schools and restaurants on Jarvis Street in the beginnings of a revival for the struggling thoroughfare.

At the end of the 18th century, Jarvis was Toronto's Champs Elysees, home to the city's upper crust. The Jarvises, the Masseys, the Cawthras and the Gooderhams -- they all outdid one another to build sumptuous Jarvis Street homes.

"Jarvis and Sherbourne are lined on either side through most part of their extent by the mansions of the upper ten," C.P. Mulvany wrote in Toronto Past and Present in 1884. But by the 1930s the great families had migrated northward, and in 1946 the city sounded the death knell for Jarvis as a destination when crews cut the trees that lined either side of the avenue to widen it for cars. Jarvis today is mostly a bleak and ugly highway.

Now, the upper crust is fighting back, regaining a toehold on Jarvis. Consider a red pile in the Romanesque Revival style, a kind of mini-Old City Hall at 504 Jarvis, just north of Wellesley on the west side. George Horace Gooderham had the place built in 1891. The family sold the house in 1906, but it somehow survived, eventually becoming Angelini's, which lasted a quarter-century as a celebrated Italian eatery.

Enter Bret Snider. A seventh-generation Torontonian, he is descended from United Empire Loyalists and a scion of the Gooderham clan. Two of his forebears defended Upper Canada in the War of 1812.

This March, Mr. Snider took over the lease on 504 Jarvis. With Gerrard Caleo, the Australian who owns the Metropolitan restaurant on Victoria Street, he has reopened the restaurant --with its gilded plaster ceiling, gold chandeliers and walls of carved gumwood -- as the Gooderham House.

Mr. Snider, a father of four, has at the same time meticulously restored the 1884 mansion at 519 Jarvis, just across the street, that was the childhood home for Vincent Massey, who became governor-general of Canada. The day I visited, a ladder leaned against the front portico; a man was painting the trim white while workers lay paving stones in the drive.

"A year ago, this place was arguably a teardown," says Mr. Snider, leading a tour through the home's picture gallery (featuring friezes by the painter Gustav Hahn) and billiards room, which are now classrooms. Last month, the home reopened as the private York College of Industry and Technology, offering diploma programs and language study.

"The bleeding on Jarvis has stopped," Mr. Snider says, stopping long enough to munch on a Mediterranean plate at the Gooderham House, washed down with a glass of Merlot. "These are undervalued cultural assets that we've ignored, and I think that's upsetting."

But he is hopeful for the future. "I really think there's a resurgence in interest in the history of the city," he says. "People are starting to recognize that it's not just the facade, it's the story that matters."

He and his neighbours are now considering a plan to rename the stretch as "The Mansion District," and others are getting in on the revival. Just south of the Massey house is Euclid Hall, once home to Hart Massey, now home to the Keg Mansion, which is closed until next month as crews complete a major restoration.

On the west side, Mr. Tremaine has purchased the historic homes of Edward Gallow, at 512 Jarvis, and Charles Rundle, at 514 Jarvis. The Rundle home, built by E.J. Lennox of Old City Hall fame, had been lovingly restored by Richard Branson as Canadian headquarters for Virgin PLC. "He pissed a ton of money into the house, thank God," says Mr. Tremaine, who has pissed in a great deal more: These days gumwood reproductions of period furniture fill its parlour, along with bronze statues.

I took a stroll down the rest of Jarvis, to Queen Street and back. It is a dispiriting exercise. Jarvis Street's nadir is the Best Western Primrose hotel, at Jarvis and Carlton street, which presents a 23-storey blank cement wall, without so much as a single window, to Jarvis.

On the plus side, I found the Steam Cafe, at 190 Jarvis, a brand-new gem with dark wood floors and leather seats. "They took a risk but it paid off," says Donald McGrath, a server. "We're getting lots of business from the courthouse and the Sears building."

Another jewel is the new home of the National Ballet School, in the old CBC headquarters at 400 Jarvis, which incorporates the Georgian home of Sir Olivar Mowat, a former premier of Ontario.

Now even the City of Toronto is getting into the act., if slowly. In exchange for permission to expand its head office with a building on Jarvis Street, Rogers a few years ago gave the city $1-million for improvements to the street. Among ideas: take out the middle lane, which changes direction during rush hour, and add either a tree-filled median, wider sidewalks with trees, or a bicycle path. But don't hold your breath.

The city has studied Jarvis for two years, says Tim Lapsa of transportation planning. "We are preparing the terms of reference for our next stage of study," he says.

Councillor Kyle Rae says narrowing Jarvis is a tough sell with some. "My colleagues to the north are going to not be happy with it, because that's how they get to City Hall," he says.

Still, as the city studies, others are not waiting around. Mr. Snider next month will bring in ballroom dancing at York College, followed by wine tasting at the Gooderham House.

"My wife has been bugging me for so many years for ballroom dancing," he says.

After so many years, it will be nice to see a little ballroom dancing back on Jarvis Street.

© National Post 2006

AoD
 
The change in Jarvis in just a short while is amazing. I lived at Jarvis and Gerrard (in the town houses on the east side of Jarvis just south of Gerrard) in 1997-1998. That corner would have the working girls out, but nothing compared to the number of women working the corner of Jarvis and Carlton. Down at Dundas and Jarvis, each corner would have 2 or 3 guys selling drugs. It was an interesting place to walk around at night.

Now it seems that all those "undesirable" elements have moved off somewhere else (I presume they've been pushed east to Sherborne or Parliament). The corner of Dundas and Jarvis is the most amazing change - that place was as close to a no-go zone as I had when I lived there. Four or five years later, the place has one of the premier event hotels in the city.
 
"Jarvis is on fire" .... "pissed a lot of money into it"

Who is this guy? Heh.

The girls are still out at Jarvis and Carlton each night. Can't compare with before though (however, in Windsor, we knew about "hooker Harvey's" even in high school).

Walking up Jarvis the other night, across from the Ballet School, just after dusk, with a troop or whever they're called practing behind all the glass, with Radio City rising behind, was quite lovely. The street is a beast though -- getting rid of the centre lane would be good.
 
I often notice the girls on Jarvis just north of Queen, by the armoury. One of them has a kick ass pair of thigh-high, white pleather boots.
 
I don't get it, what's the problem with working girls? I'd rather have them out on the street at night then have no one around. Why do we always equate corners with street workers as bad neighbourhoods? They're always outside my bldg and supposedly Trinity Bellwoods is one of the "hottest" neighbourhoods in the city. I think we need to let go of our moral judgements when ascertaining changes in the city. They serve no purpose.
 
The working girls never bothered me. They got to recognize me as a local, and wouldn't bother soliciting me. We would just exchange a nod and a hello.

Plus, because of their presence, there was a strong police presence that meant it was never more than 5 minutes between cruisers passing by.

What bothered me was the dealers. They were scary, and there was more than a few beatings / stabbings that occured around Jarvis and Dundas when I was there.
 
"I don't get it, what's the problem with working girls?"

It's extremely dangerous for one thing.
 
The city has studied Jarvis for two years, says Tim Lapsa of transportation planning. "We are preparing the terms of reference for our next stage of study," he says.
______________________________________________

You've got to be kidding me. How long has the city had this seed money from Rogers? Talk about bureaucrat-ese!
 
Remember: streetwalkers are only the ugly barrel-bottom surface image of "the profession". They only serve the ugly bottom of the barrel who wouldn't know enough to use Now, Eye, the Redzone et al.

On that count they're "undesirable", because the alternative means exists already...
 
Greg: With all respect it's not a coincidence that the working girls and the dealers are found in close proximity to each other.
 
Ia m glad it is coming back. I think Jarvis is a great street with some amazing places and buildings.

Of course most people know it as the hooker section. I mentioned that Jarvis is getting better today at dinner, and my moms first words where "thats where people go for hookers".

Its amazing how famous Jarvis is for that. At Tourism Toronto I have a tough sell getting customers to stay in hotels on Jarvis Street. They would all go "thats where you go for hookers". I am like "how does someone in Denver know this" :)

Jarvis up near Wellesley has some amazing old NYC style apartment houses. They are just amazing and really well kept.
 
Going to have to check out Hooker Harvey's and see if it still lives up to its name.
 
It's a good news article, Jarvis actually has many attractive buildings from different eras. I think Jarvis really needs one less lane, but I would give over the remainder to the sidewalks on either side, rather than a central median. Without one less lane, the nature of the street won't change much even with the current developments and renos.
 

Back
Top