reaperexpress
Senior Member
Retractable bollards, sensors, etc. all cost a lot of money. Is it worth it to solve a problem that wouldn't exist if we just re-arranged the light phases at intersections?
It sounds like an overly complex solution, with potential for frozen bollards, lags in maintenance, cars running over half-retracted bollards, etc.
Retractable bollards do indeed sound awfully expensive. Although this particular problem wouldn't exist with the standard median design, it too has issues. There is a 7 km/h speed limit on intersections on the Queensway because according to the driver I asked, the TTC is nervous about left-turning cars hitting transit vehicles (despite the dedicated left turn signal).
As we've discussed here, using a different road layout (such as U-turns, 2-stage lefts etc.) would benefit transit more than simply changing around the light phases, because it actually increases the amount of time that's green for transit. These can additionally be combined with changed light timings to offer further speed increases for transit.
Obviously we aren't going to implement 2-phase lefts or Michigan lefts on St. Clair or Spadina, there simply isn't room. This is a question for building new lines. If we're spending billions of dollars building new LRT or BRT lines, I don't think the cost of an extra traffic signal (and possibly crossing arms) is really that significant.
As for the issue of stupid people getting stuck on the tracks, I have a few points:
- If they do get onto the tracks and a vehicle is coming, they can back up. Transit vehicles are probably capable of stopping in time anyway though.
- It isn't common for people to stop on level crossings, so how is this any different?
- If we do need some kind of protection, I would go with regular railway crossing arms because retractable bollards sound awfully high maintenance.