News   Oct 19, 2020
 176     0 
News   Oct 19, 2020
 384     2 
News   Oct 19, 2020
 364     0 

Hudson Yards Development (NYC)

Urban Shocker

Doyenne
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
8,465
Reaction score
8
City Place is about as unorganic as you can get, but for what it is - hundreds of smallish, conveniently located, moderately priced apartments for a youngish get-up-and-go crowd who want to live downtown - I think it works well enough and might be considered "attractive". Though it is rather odd that the highrise form was reverted to after the success of the earlier St. Lawrence neighbourhood, City Place looks quite pretty on the skyline, and what's more city-like than tall, sleek towers?
 

adma

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
16,654
Reaction score
1,217
Also cf. its Vancouver prototype. (And there, too, high-rise was a departure from a 70s/80s low-rise pattern of "enlightened" development along False Creek.)
 

interchange42

Administrator
Staff member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
23,541
Reaction score
20,273
Location
by the Humber
$1B deal in NYC to develop West Side rail yards collapses
May 8, 2008
Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) - A $1 billion deal to build skyscrapers, apartments and parks over a desolate stretch of rail yards by the Hudson River collapsed six weeks after it was announced in an "impasse" over zoning and the timing of payments, the rail yards' owner said Thursday.

Tishman Speyer Properties -- the owner of Rockefeller Center and the Chrysler Building -- and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority couldn't finalize the deal they reached in March to redevelop the 26-acre rail yards, considered one of the city's last, best building opportunities.

Negotiations "reached an impasse" Thursday after Tishman Speyer sought to postpone making payments for part of the rail yards until the other half was rezoned the way the developer wanted, the transit agency said. The rezoning would need approval of City Council in a process likely to take years.

"This demand changed the economics of the proposed deals and the certainty of payments to the MTA," the agency said.

Agency spokesman Jeremy Soffin said in a statement later that negotiations had broken off and that Tishman no longer has development rights to the property.

Tishman Speyer spokesman Robert Lawson said Thursday that the developer had been negotiating "in good faith" with the MTA for weeks. "We still hope to be able to complete this deal and reach an agreement that satisfies the needs of everyone," Lawson said.

Tishman Speyer won a five-month bidding war over some of the city's biggest developers for the rail yards on either side of 11th Avenue between 30th and 33rd Streets, offering just over $1 billion for a 99-year lease.

Urban planners had said the expansion on Manhattan's far West side was crucial to the city's future, as developers sought to create a third major business district in the city and a residential waterfront community that would transform a dreary neighborhood dominated by warehouses.

The governor, mayor, and several other politicians joined developers Rob and Jerry Speyer in March for a news conference next to the yards in late March, proclaiming that decades of waiting to develop the far West Side had ended. The Speyers unveiled a scale model for four skyscrapers, thousands of apartments, parkland and a cultural center.

On Thursday, deputy mayor for economic rebuilding Bob Lieber called the collapse "very disappointing" but said the city was committed to helping redevelop the land.

Tishman Speyer had made a preliminary payment of $11 million for rights to the land while final terms were negotiated, the MTA said. Tishman Speyer then sought to change a major point of the deal, which would postpone payments on the section of yards east of 11th Avenue until the western side of the yards was rezoned, the MTA said. The agency, which operates the nation's largest mass transit system, had said it had needed immediate payments for the land to help plug its own budget holes.

Several other obstacles had threatened the development. Tishman Speyer had the right to walk away if the MTA didn't go through with a promised extension of a subway line to the river. Tishman Speyer hadn't said how it would finance over $2 billion it would need to build a platform over the yards, where Long Island Rail Road trains are parked near Penn Station. And the developers had no anchor tenant for the proposed office towers.

The MTA didn't say whether it would reopen discussions with the other developers that had bid on the property last fall, including Related Cos. and a joint venture of The Durst Organization and Vornado Realty Trust.

"The MTA remains committed to developing these very unique and valuable parcels of land," the agency said. Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 

Top