crs1026
Superstar
^Upgrading 30 mph to 45 mph gives a very positive.improvement on travel time, given the current signal spacing which would have trains receiving restrictive signals and preparing to slow to 30 some distance from the junction. And of course the accel and decel times and speeds are improved. Given the transition from 4 tracks to 3, plenty of trains will need to cross over there. So it may not be the ultimate, but it’s a good thing.
I would want to see ML do one or two pilot implementations of higher than 45 turnouts before installing them in a critical location such as Canpa. Because snow and ice and the more complicated mechanics of a longer turnout. Yeah, lots of people may have them, but the ML workforce (who are contractors, and subject to change) need learning time.
Canpa is also where equipment moves enter and leave yards. Some of those routes are constrained by 15 mph turnouts and yard operating restrictions. I wonder if the upgrades will improve any of that. A train slowing to 15 mph to enter the yard uses up track time.
- Paul
I would want to see ML do one or two pilot implementations of higher than 45 turnouts before installing them in a critical location such as Canpa. Because snow and ice and the more complicated mechanics of a longer turnout. Yeah, lots of people may have them, but the ML workforce (who are contractors, and subject to change) need learning time.
Canpa is also where equipment moves enter and leave yards. Some of those routes are constrained by 15 mph turnouts and yard operating restrictions. I wonder if the upgrades will improve any of that. A train slowing to 15 mph to enter the yard uses up track time.
- Paul




