44 North
Senior Member
I doubt if there is any room to add more tracks in Streetsville.
What about adding more streets in Tracksville? Sorry, that was lame.
I doubt if there is any room to add more tracks in Streetsville.
What about adding more streets in Tracksville? Sorry, that was lame.
My guess is that if the Bowmanville extension gets built then GO will use both stations. Given that the Bowmanville extension runs on CP track, it will be rush hour only and most trains will continue to terminate at Oshawa GO.
There is only a 2 block area that is tight, otherwise 4 tracks 100%
The setup that I've envisioned (not based on anything official, just my take on it) is that the branch into downtown Oshawa and Bowmanville will be hourly service with slightly higher during peak, and the RER will terminate at the current Oshawa station. This would be a similar configuration to other RER setups, like for example the Barrie line. It's projected to have RER up to Aurora, and conventional GO trains beyond there. The difference here is that the terminus point for the RER would in essence be a branch off the thru line.
No it would not as it would have a major impact on CP as well having the room to put in a underpass on Thomas St for the grade separation.That area could benefit from a Weston type of grade separation anyway. Adding 2 more dedicated GO tracks would provide a pretty good impetus for that.
Funny because I envisioned it the other way around for one reason: the new branch downtown will go...well...downtown!
You want RER lines to be in walkable/bussable areas, basically areas with higher density. The focus will be away from the car and intermodal transportaion hubs. Also, there already is some NIMBYISM with GO proceeding with using this branch: in 2013 when they announced it there was local backlash of "loud stinky diesel trains going through peoples backyards". Electric trains will have much less local opposition.
"support for GO Transit expansion to Bowmanville, but a preference to keep the alignment south of Highway 401 to avoid disrupting residential areas."
http://www.metrolinx.com/en/docs/pd.../20130214_BoardMtg_The_Big_Move_Update_EN.pdf
So, it would make much more sense for the RER to go into the heart of Whitby and Oshawa rather than the peak service, peak service could still be at the current stations with their massive parking lots for the commuters.
However, Bowmanville will definitely be peak service at first (and maybe forever, it might be "too far" for RER, I already think Oshawa is a bit far, and is only getting RER because it gets 30 minute all day service now) and its supposed to use the CPR corridor. (the new branch)
Its a weird conundrum.
Perhaps with the opposition we will see RER use the branch and terminate in Oshawa, and see another extension of the old GO train tracks along the CN route to Bowmanville for peak service using the diesel trains.
No it would not as it would have a major impact on CP as well having the room to put in a underpass on Thomas St for the grade separation.
The NIMBY folks would be bitching at the noise the engines would be making climbing the grade. Also, its a short distance to be at grade to go over Britannia Rd underpass that is built for 6 tracks.
By 2017, Oshawa commuters will have a new train station to come to.
http://www.oshawaexpress.ca/viewposting.php?view=8383
That's a good point. On most of my maps I did indeed show it that way (RER to Bowmanville via downtown Oshawa). To me though, that configuration makes much more sense if a longer-range type GO service is introduced to either Port Hope or Cobourg. Downtown Oshawa could definitely benefit from the RER though, even if it's not right in the core.
Good points. Although I suspect that the amount of noise generated from a train climbing a grade in a trench would still probably be less from ground level than a train on flat ground at ground level. From what I remember, there isn't really much in the form of noise abatement in that area right now.
Has Stouffville double tracking started?