News   Jan 07, 2025
 1K     2 
News   Jan 07, 2025
 4.2K     14 
News   Jan 07, 2025
 534     1 

Eye on Rob Ford

S

spmarshall

Guest
A long article. Just the first few paragraphs included, but Eye archives everything seemingly forever. Worth reading - the first sentence itself is telling.

The Rob Ford Problem

Penny-pincher, name-caller, ward-heeler, right-wing raving lunatic -- if Rob Ford is as crazy as he seems, why do voters in Etobicoke like him so much?
BY EDWARD KEENAN

PHOTOGRAPHY KERI KNAPP

At the end of last month, maverick City Councillor Rob Ford was attacking the $1.5 million in grants the City of Toronto gives to AIDS awareness programs, since "if you are not doing needles and you are not gay, you won't get AIDS probably -- that's the bottom line." That was just the hum-along hook to an epic operetta dissecting Toronto's $50 million in grant programs. Alongside the fat-cat AIDS establishment, Ford lambasted the cultural hogs at the city trough: the opera, the symphony, the ballet -- "This is so embarrassing. I just wanted to bring it to the attention of the poor taxpayer who is getting screwed left, right and centre by these grants." Ford was just getting warmed up when his five minutes of speaking time expired, so he asked for an extension -- a courtesy granted routinely in the hot-air-filled council chamber. Not this time. Council shut him up.

Later, Councillor Kyle Rae told Xtra that he and his colleagues are fed up with Ford. "I think [we're] embarrassed that we have a buffoon on council. I think he is fairly ostracized within council. It's almost like we're stuck with him."

Rae was expressing a sentiment that's widespread among councillors and downtown leftists. It's as if Rob Ford seems to be baiting them -- taunting them with his way-politically-incorrect speechifying -- at every turn. He's called people names: Giorgio Mammoliti is a "scammer," genteel Gloria Lindsay Luby is a "waste of skin." He once mused about declaring Toronto a "refugee-free zone." He drives his minivan to work on Car Free Day and considers laws banning pesticides and protecting trees symptoms of "communism" and "dictatorship." It gets better: he's volunteered to take an incinerator in his ward and only spends between $2 and $8 annually on office expenses, shaming those who approach the $50,000 limit. Then, in April, there was the time he showed up drunk to a Leafs game, shouting obscenities at those around him and handing out his business cards.

This raises a few questions about what might be called the Rob Ford Problem. What does it say about Toronto city council that it can be home to such a blustering embarrassment? How does a raving lunatic like this get elected twice (the second time with 80 per cent of the vote), with no defeat apparent on the election-year horizon? Are the voters in North Etobicoke as nutty as he is? ....
 
God help us, should this baffoon ever become mayor. He'd probably shut down the TTC, immediately halt the waterfront revitalization, and cancel all beautification efforts downtown entirely.
 
I just read it in the print version. It's not actually that long an article, and it's surprisingly good. It shows exactly why Rob Ford is so successful. He's an outstanding constituency politician. The latter part of the article is far more balanced.
 
Yeah, I never understood how a twit like Ford could get elected, but after reading the whole thing, I kinda do now - it's all about returning phone calls and being around in the neighbourhood.
 
He may be a raving lunatic, but to be quite honest -- health programs should be funded at the provincial level. The Toronto city council should be more focused in what it is responsible for. i.e. roads, parks, infrastructure, and transit.
 
Strange to see Ford make the cover of Eye. It seems that Eye is continually re-positioning itself as a bit more newsier and topical than Now (which almost exclusively puts entertainment on its cover).

feature_home_top.jpg
 
cacruden:

He may be a raving lunatic, but to be quite honest -- health programs should be funded at the provincial level. The Toronto city council should be more focused in what it is responsible for. i.e. roads, parks, infrastructure, and transit.

A lot of the health and social services delivered by the city is provincially mandated. It's called downloading, and the city isn't in a position to "focus" in what it is responsible for.

AoD
 
"and cancel all beautification efforts downtown entirely."

Would that mean the money spent on Clean and Beautiful is shifted back to being spent equally in all parts of the city? If so, bring it on.
 
Funny how in the recap of all the dirt attached to Rob Ford, they neglected to mention the shooting of his sister (who I can't help picturing in "Jerri Blank" terms)...
 
One could not find a more perfect example of a buffoon, but he does exactly what a politician is supposed to do. The article is right: those who try to beat him would do well to heed his example.
 
Probably part of the reason he is popular is that a lot of people privately agree with some of his views. For example, I would bet that a lot of people in Toronto believe that since AIDS is easily preventable, other city services more deserve our money.
 
I would bet that a lot of people in Toronto believe that since AIDS is easily preventable, other city services more deserve our money.
I was going to say that it should probably be a federal program, but looking at the expenditures most of the money went to recruiting local speakers and holding workshops.

The programs targeted recent immigrants, high-school students, and sex-workers.

The first category means that some of the money simply flows through the city and is really federal "new-immigrant" funding. Yes, more is needed but we're obligated to spend it on bringing them up to speed on the things they may have missed out on.

High-school students should be getting enough details through the provinces education system that they don't require the city to step in. This implies something is broken with the education policies of the province.

Sex-workers receive a large number of programs but they also generally pay taxes and licensing fees (strip-clubs) to pay for this type of program. Perhaps the problem is the restriction on licenses and the complete lack of licensing for prostitution? Ensure the license is displayed at all times and require regular medical exams. Charge enough for licenses to cover the cost of regulating the industry.

I see city council voted in favour of decriminalizing prostitution in '95. Boothby wasn't happy and it seems nothing came out of it.
 
It seems that Eye is continually re-positioning itself as a bit more newsier and topical than Now (which almost exclusively puts entertainment on its cover).
Actually, I take that back.

NOW had a in-depth cover feature on our most precious resource -- water.

cover.jpg
 
In other news, RIP Tom Jakobek's father-in-law...

TORONTO, Aug. 2 /CNW/ - Mayor David Miller today extended condolences to
the family and friends of former Scarborough and Metro Toronto Councillor Ken
Morrish and expressed thanks for his dedication to his city.
"I always had tremendous respect for Ken and for his commitment to public
service," Miller said. "He left his mark on both Scarborough and Metro
Councils over the 35 years he sat on them."
Miller and Morrish sat on Metro Council together from 1994 to 1997 during
which time Morrish served as Deputy Metro Chairman under Alan Tonks.
During his life in politics, Morrish, who represented eastern Scarborough
beginning in 1967, also served on numerous City boards and commissions. His
family was one of the first to settle in the Highland Creek community, and in
1999 the City changed the name of East Point Park to the Ken Morrish Softball
Complex.
 
Generally though Eye's reportage (and, erm, let's say editorial standards) seem quite a bit higher than Now's when it comes to news.

That said, I find Now's entertainment coverage much more comprehensive.

(Full disclosure: I'm a past Eye contributor).
 

Back
Top