Undead
Senior Member
As surely as the sun rises in the morning, so do Toronto transit debates come full circle.That was the LRT proposal. haha
As surely as the sun rises in the morning, so do Toronto transit debates come full circle.That was the LRT proposal. haha
woudlnt this then negate this decades long debate if theyre thinking about keeping the elevated row? wasnt the whole point to dismantle it?But to what extend are modifications necessary to use standard streetcars?
Obviously the catenary is missing, and track is out a centimetre or so, but it was originally designed for CLRVs.
No need to upgrade permanently to Flexity Freedom standards.
The final design was done in such a way to prevent the use of streetcarsBut to what extend are modifications necessary to use standard streetcars?
Obviously the catenary is missing, and track is out a centimetre or so, but it was originally designed for CLRVs.
No need to upgrade permanently to Flexity Freedom standards.
Hence my question.The final design was done in such a way to prevent the use of streetcars
The TTC is considering re-using the SRT guideway and stations for bus replacement service
I thought they couldn't use the guideway?
Can't read anything you need.I thought they couldn't use the guideway?
Theoretically they just need to pave it. In reality however, it might affect the GO expansion along the Stouffville Line. The SRT station clearance would be another issue. They might need to detour around the stations or demolish them first.I thought they couldn't use the guideway?
Steve Munro has already analysed why only some of the SRT corridor can be used -Can't see why they can't jury-rig it for buses in one-direction only. That would be useful in the peak direction at rush hour.
and
Basically it's easier to use the at grade bits of the SRT corridor, and it's cheaper too - more buses for your money!"There are several problems with using the elevated structure between the GO corridor and McCowan Station.https://stevemunro.ca/2021/02/07/recycling-the-srt/#more-33395
- First is the extra space needed for buses and their dynamic clearance. The SRT cars are narrower, and they fill the structure in which they run. The guideway is actually a pair of U-shaped concrete “lanes” for the SRT track, and could not be used “as is” for buses.
- Second, the station at Midland is integrated with the bridge, and could not be easily modified. (This problem came up during consideration of other modes on the corridor including a subway.)
- Third, access to and from the elevated would require ramps just like the Gardiner Expressway, and these would increase the structure’s footprint at ground level.
- Fourth, operationally it would be much simpler for buses to serve Scarborough Town Centre at grade than to run via the elevated (leaving aside other problems) because they would not be constrained by access points to and from the structure."
That' all seems to based on the assumption that bus or streetcar operation on the SRC would be two-directional, not one-directional.Steve Munro has already analysed why only some of the SRT corridor can be used -
Shoring machines galore
View attachment 336045
A good reminder in this image how low density this area is. I wonder what it'll look like in 20 years and if the subway will change that?