News   Dec 23, 2025
 668     3 
News   Dec 23, 2025
 1.6K     1 
News   Dec 23, 2025
 2.4K     1 

CBC ices Hockey Night theme

I think this is the stupidest thing ever. Why would CTV want a song associated for so many years with their competitor? Its like Pepsi buying the Coca Cola song... the logic of it just eludes me. Really it smacks of a corporate private broadcaster taking the opportunity to deliver a slap in the face to CBC and its supporters more than anything. Where is the value in appropriating someone elses identity? Just goes to show that anything and everything is for sale these days. I would also propose boycotting CTV and TSN, but then again I already do that... just too corporate for me. In the end I guess CBC should have moved years ago to obtain perpetual rights to the song.

It's a pretty smart move actually. People associate the song as much with hockey (and nationalism) as they do the CBC. By putting the song on their broadcasts they add a lot of perceived value and a sense of authenticity. They also appear as saviours of Canadian culture. Good decision on their part.
 
Well, the CBC just selected the winner "Canadian Gold" to replace the old song. I must say, I think I prefer it, especially the first half. Simple, powerful. I am glad the CBC decided to ice the old ring tone. I wouldn't have payed anything for the 1960s version of Crazy Frog, let alone the millions that batty old lady was asking for. If the CBC had caved in, the exact same people who are complaining about a "loss of heritage" would be complaining of taxpayer money being wasted. Like most situations for the CBC, it is a loose loose position. I think they made the best out of it.
 
That song is pretty cheesy! I miss the original song it's part of hockey history.
 
Cheesy? It's a sports anthem!

Just watch the TSN shows if you want to hear the original...

42
 
That song is pretty cheesy! I miss the original song it's part of hockey history.

I agree with you.

The final anthem is weak. It lacks any grit (this is hockey for christs sake). It lacks any passion. It doesn't even flow with the opening segment, which the original did.

To think this is the best that CBC could do from 15,000 or so entries? Come on now! I heard all the finalists anthems on CBC's website and they all sounded boring. I didn't even bother voting because I was so disappointed in the end result.

On another website, I described the new anthem as something you'd hear watching an orientation video at a new job (back in the 80's).

But that's what CBC gets for being cheap. Their time is numbered anyhow, they cannot compete with the big players in the game, such as TSN and Sportsnet. Bob Cole needs to go as well.

A song that would be perfect for the anthem would be 'Three Days Grace - I Hate Everything About You'. Now that's a perfect song/anthem for a damn hockey game!
 
A song that would be perfect for the anthem would be 'Three Days Grace - I Hate Everything About You'. Now that's a perfect song/anthem for a damn hockey game!

Why do you hate beauty? At least Nickelback didn't come into the picture...
 
It'll sound better once they work on the arrangement. I heard the first attempt at the original theme (the concept) and it sounds a lot weaker than the arrangement most Canadians are familiar with.
 
Actually, I was quite skeptical that they could find a replacement for such an iconic theme but... they're getting there. I like the new song but it sounds cheap in a way. It needs to be recorded with a real orchestra rather than by a computer.

It'll mature over time and I have no doubt that if it continues playing for as long as the old one did, it'll be just as iconic.
 
Sounds slightly generic and not much better than what you'd expect to hear in a video game intro but it's never been about the damn song anyway.

I'm sure this one will grow on us and unless they switch it again today's youngsters will associate it with HNIC as we all do the old theme.

I'm just curious about one thing... I wonder how much money the CBC invested into this contest and paying the winner etc vs the cost for buying the rights to the old version? I'm sure the difference isn't astronomical. Then again it is public money so it was nice to see the CBC do the right thing regardless of the result.
 
It was a promo event, and provided material for broadcast, so I don't think any cost associated with it can be directly compared to the value of the song.
 
I like it. With a bigger orchestration and a beefing up of the hook it should be good.
 
I found this to be quite amusing:


Pipes and funk. What's wrong with this country?
LYNN CROSBIE
From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

October 13, 2008 at 9:17 PM EDT
First you hear a crowd screaming, “We want the funk!†No, no, it's the fresher, “We want the cup!†Then bagpipes. For a minute and 18 seconds.

This is Canadian Gold, the Celtic-flavoured $100,000 winner of CBC's appalling search for a replacement theme song for Hockey Night in Canada.

On Saturday night, veteran hockey commentator Don Cherry announced this song, composed by the 37-year-old, Alberta-based musician and school teacher Colin Oberst, as the winner of the contest launched in June.

The second-place winner, out of more than 15,000 entries (including mine, Die, Leafs, Die), was also announced: the bluntly titled Sticks to the Ice, written by a 13-year-old Torontonian named Robert Fraser Burke.

By now, we are all familiar with the wretched story of Vancouver artist Dolores Claman, who wrote The Hockey Song that Hockey Night in Canada has been using as its intro since 1968.

Unable to reach a fair settlement with CBC, who had the audacity to nickel and dime their own Siren, Claman has since placed the song with CTV, and, while Stompin' Tom Connors also expressed interest in selling CBC the rights to his own, second-best-known hockey theme, the public broadcaster went with the pipes and the funk.

What is wrong with this country?

Claman's ascending, horn-heavy instrumental is so deeply embedded in our consciousness, so painfully evocative, that it is more moving and more memorable than our idiotic national anthem. Said anthem has existed in several different versions since 1880 and was only signed into law in 1980. I still don't know the words to O Canada. And I bet you don't either. Come on, sing the Ton histoire est une épopée bit. Or the Inuktitut version.

But I do know every word of The Star-Spangled Banner. Is that because America the Rapacious Monster has slipped me yet another roofie, or is it because Americans are fiercely protective of their various histories?

And that they are protective also of “remembranceâ€? If that word feels unusually Canadian, thanks to war veterans, it is not. Knowing the words and melodies of a few key songs does not necessarily make us patriots but it makes us human; in other words, not apes at a birthday party improvising, “Hippo Blah Blah Blah Blah!â€

In other words, there are a few, a very few songs that assemble masses of people into a community, that yoke us together, in spite of our differences. This is one of the reasons people are solemn or even cry while singing their anthems: Because the familiar words and e pluribus unum sentiment make us embrace the illusion and truth of having, and belonging to a “home and native land.â€

To alter such songs is heresy: Imagine if ball fans everywhere were suddenly told by the estate of Norworth and Bayes to stop singing Take Me Out to the Ballgame during the seventh-inning stretch? Or, if on a whim, major league baseball, in cahoots with Arby's, decided to change the words to, “Buy me some roast beef and pepper jack�

Impossible.

Yet here is CBC – and what is Cherry smiling about? The broadcaster is forever threatening to unload him as well – calmly losing a song that identifies, for several generations, our national sport, definitively, and replacing this song. Why not make the players wear hemp skirts?

The genius of the Claman song and its placement on the show was its function. It served as an anxious anticipatory appetizer for crazed fans, while also serving to train others to note, on some level, that it was Saturday night – in a far more familiar-yet-thrilling way than a frail Elton John or Bay City Roller song ever could.

Those of you who grew up hating hockey still thrill to the sound of the song and can sing it note for note. Others who love the game feel the song as surely as their own heartbeat and still others will take exception to CBC Sports executive director Scott Moore's comment that, “Hockey is a game. It's not a song.â€

Fan of the game or not, one would have to be a fool not to understand that the game is a song: Its propulsion is the loud rock music played throughout (to say nothing of the songs of the crowds), and its performance prayer is Claman's work.

CBC is re-vamping its image, incrementally, and clearly phasing out such old-timers as Cherry, colour commentator Harry Neale and play-by-play announcer Bob Cole, to create an aesthetic arena where the voice of Foster Hewitt will be a mere cherished memory of old-time fanatics who take their game without bagpipes.

But losing the song – and its shift to CTV is not lateral – is almost as terrible as watching the Leafs. When the controversy came to a boil this summer, one news crew went out and interviewed people on the street, young and old, and each of them sang the song perfectly and were dismayed.

Claman's song, for reasons both logical (history, tradition) and esoteric (evoking poet Anne Sexton's line that “music remembers better†than us) was the energy behind the CBC broadcast, and with its departure goes the station's position as an announcer of the past and present, as our own rebel yell that “It's Saturday Night!â€

Change is as inevitable as death, but art should transcend such mortal matters. In 40 years will generations be pricking up their ears at the word “cup†and the wheeze of a bagpipe?

Regardless, I hear The Hockey Song in my head remembering so much of what I have forgotten and stand on guard, I stand on guard for it.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081013.wcrosbie14/BNStory/Entertainment/home
 

Back
Top