News   Mar 09, 2026
 246     0 
News   Mar 09, 2026
 348     0 
News   Mar 06, 2026
 1.9K     7 

Canadian Coalition for (Right Wing) Democracies

U

urbanboyto

Guest
Has anyone else been trapped onto this right wing lobby group's email list?

They are constantly sending me fear stoking emails about Terrorism and criticizing Stephan Dion's approaches.

Here is another example of their many mailings

Despite number requests they never remove me from their mailing list. Note terrorist fear monger (and anti-immigrant) former security officer David Harris seems to be fronting this.

Anyone else having trouble getting off their list? Is there anyone we can complain to?

Domestic terror wins big in today's flip-flop vote by Dion's Liberals

For Immediate Release
Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Ottawa, Canada - Today, the Liberal opposition lead by Stéphane Dion joined with the other Opposition parties to kill two provisions of Canada Anti-Terrorism Act that were passed into law by the Liberal government of Jean Chrétien in 2002. With all the hyperbole generated by these provisions, it is essential that Canadians understand their implications and judge for themselves if today's vote was a win for human rights or for those plotting acts of terror in Canada.

The "preventative arrest" provision is an appropriate and constitutional response to today's mass-casualty terrorist threat. This provision allows police to detain persons whom they believe "on reasonable grounds" to be about to commit an act of terror. Within one day, or as soon as constitutionally possible, the detainee must be brought before a judge to validate the detention.

The other provision authorizes the use of "investigative hearings" to require a person who has material knowledge of a terrorist act to be examined by a judge with regard to information that may prevent a planned attack or help identify the perpetrators of a past attack. Again, the law requires "reasonable grounds" to proceed. Moreover, it allows the person in question to have counsel, and prohibits the use of information drawn from the person to be used against that individual in any later criminal proceedings, save for reasonable exceptions relating to perjury and associated offences.

CSIS has identified over 50 terrorist groups operating on Canadian soil and over $256 million have been identified by FINTRAC in 2005/2006 as having possible links to terrorism. Today, Canadians lost vital tools needed to stop a massacre before it happens and to compel those with knowledge of terrorist activity to disclose such vital information to a judge.

CCD notes with deep concern the record of the Liberal Party in relation to several terrorism issues. These issues include its opposition for thirteen years while in government to proposals for a judicial inquiry into the Air India bombing, its refusal to ban Hezbollah until finally being forced to do so by court action, and its refusal to list the notorious Tamil Tigers as a terrorist organization. And now in Opposition, the Liberals are further weakening our ability to break up terrorist cells and prevent the kind of massacres of civilians that have occurred in London, Madrid, New York, Amsterdam, and countless other cities. Along with other elements of the public record, these matters raise grave questions about whether the Liberal leadership is pandering to radical religious and ethno-cultural voting blocks at the expense of Canadians' safety and security.

"For over a decade, the Liberals ignored pleas from victims' families for an inquiry into the Air India bombing," said David Harris, Senior Fellow for National Security for CCD. "Today's vote ordered by Stéphane Dion may have effectively killed the ongoing police investigation by making it impossible to compel testimony from material witnesses. One must question the determination of the Liberals to leave unexamined the worst act of airline terror in history and its bungled 20-year prosecution, and to abandon those whose lives were shattered by this atrocity."

"Liberal leaders' continuing disregard for the innocent terror victims of Canada, Sri Lanka, Lebanon, Israel and India triggers disturbing concerns about the price politicians are willing to pay for votes," said Alastair Gordon, President of CCD. "By opposing extension of their own Party's anti-terrorism provisions at a time when Canada is specifically targeted by bin Laden and Islamic extremism, Liberals owe Canadians an explanation. Is the risk to Canadians' safety and security to be regarded as just another reasonable trade-off in the struggle for political power?"

-30-

For more information, please contact:
Alastair Gordon, President, CCD 416-963-8998
David Harris, Senior Fellow for National Security, CCD 613-233-1220

If you would like to comment on this statement or other topics relating to foreign policy, please visit our public message forum and post your comments:
canadiancoalition.com/for...1539.shtml

For an index of CCD in the Media, please visit:
canadiancoalition.com/media.shtml

Founded in 2003, the Canadian Coalition for Democracies (CCD) is a non-partisan, multi-ethnic, multi-denominational organization of concerned Canadians dedicated to national security and the protection and promotion of democracy at home and abroad. CCD focuses on research, education and media publishing to build a greater understanding of the importance of national security and a pro-democracy foreign policy.canadiancoalition.com/


UNSUBSCRIBE: We apologize if you do not wish to receive periodic mailings from CCD. If you would like to be removed from our mailing list, please click here to unsubscribe or REPLY to this email with unsubscribe in the subject line. Your email address will be removed immediately. Thank you.
 
Hmm, members from 3 parties, representing the majority of the electorate, chose to defeat a piece of legislation in the democratically elected House of Commons. Seems like democracy in action to me. Carry on.

AoD

PS: I am waiting to see Tom Wappel defect.
 
And Liberals defeated Liberal legislation.

Alvin,

Where could Tom go?

Hmmm.
 
Today, the Liberal opposition lead by Stéphane Dion
Um, isn't that supposed to say "opposition led by...". Though one could argue that Dion's party is weighed down with lead. Honestly, my expertise in English is not perfect, but surely a journalist would have a dictionary?
 
It wasn't written by a journalist. It's a press release from some obscure extremist think tank.
 
My suggestion: don't be offended. Just don't open it, and delete it upon receipt, as with any other spam, semi-spam, and can't-be-bothered...
 
If you were using gmail, you could train it to remove it as spam.
 
And Liberals defeated Liberal legislation.

No they didn't. The Liberals specifically designed it with a sunset clause, while the Tories want to extend the powers indefinitely. There's no reason why the Liberals shouldn't vote to maintain the existing expiry date.
 
With all the hyperbole generated by these provisions, it is essential that Canadians understand their implications and judge for themselves if today's vote was a win for human rights or for those plotting acts of terror in Canada.

Regardless of the Liberal policy ping-pong game (damn they play well), I like how the author of this fine article manages to set up the classic either/or scenario for weighing terror plots versus human rights, once again illustrating that one-dimensional thinking is safe from extinction.
 

Back
Top