News   Dec 05, 2025
 1.2K     5 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 4K     12 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 766     0 

Canada and the World

1758773763742.png


OTTAWA — Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has signed a trade agreement and a defence agreement with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Parliament Hill, as Canada expands its ties with Southeast Asia.

Subianto said on Parliament Hill that the agreements are “very important for us, very strategic economically.”
Indonesia’s population of 280 million people is younger than most, and the country is on track to be one of the five largest economies by 2050. It has been trying to wean itself off fossil fuels, as it copes with threats to its vast biodiversity.

The deal comes into effect next year, and should drop prices for Canadian wheat, potash, wood and soybeans, according to Carney’s office.

Trade Minister Maninder Sidhu said the deal gives preferential access to Canada’s agriculture, energy, telecom, aerospace and defence sectors.
He also said Indonesia is looking “very seriously” at purchasing small modular nuclear reactors to help power remote islands. Canada is developing that technology, which aims to power remote and northern communities.
Subianto touted Canada’s legacy for fighting poverty through aid initiatives linked to health, agriculture and peacekeeping.

“We consider Canada to be a very responsible, mature, leading power of the West, but with great empathy for the concerns of the developing nations,” he said.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/art...nt-signs-trade-deal-defence-pact-with-canada/
 
  • Like
Reactions: PL1
Not encouraging for speedy implementation. It sounds like in the short term, the government should be focusing on infrastructure (training capacity, housing, etc.-- timely with the downturn in construction) and simplified procurements, with more off-the-shelf systems not requiring extensive customization/specifications. Not sure how much they can realistically shovel out the door in the near term short of pay increases and the like.
 
For those who think the threat is exaggerated....


And then there is the issue of the transatlantic fiberoptic communication cables. Russia has made it clear that one of the first things they'll do, should it come to blows with NATO, is they will cut the coms cables off the coast of Ireland. Ireland being a non-NATO nation with zero defenses. Ireland already caught Russians spying on the cable infrastructure back in 2020. And Russian naval vessels have been spotted doing training runs in 2024. If they succeed, that's going to thoroughly mess with global communications and cause all sorts of informational chaos and disarray. Some background:

Then again, Russia is a paper tiger. They are coming up on a 4-year anniversary of a 14-day "special military operation" against Ukraine - a nation without a navy and up until recently without airpower. And the only equipment Ukraine was allowed to field is the hand-me-down NATO tech from 70's and 80's plus their tiny stockpiles of Soviet equipment of the same vintage. And Russia can't even deal with that. It would be suicidal for Russia to go to war with NATO. I say that with the full understanding that even though it is obvious that the attack on NATO by Russia would be suicidal, it doesn't mean Russia will not attack. Their dear supreme leader has shown time and again that he does not make rational decisions. Probably because he is so far removed from reality, he is incapable of making rational decisions anymore. So if he gets enough reports on his table about how weak and disjointed NATO members are, that America will not back Europe if he invades, he might just be crazy enough to try.

Although I would think that the arctic fleet will be used as a standoff threat rather than for the initial attack. If Russia decides to attack NATO, it would most likely be a ground invasion of Baltic states, starting with Estonia and/or Latvia.
 
...nothing like being sandwiched between two mad kings. /bleh
 
Despite my Orange routes, I do hope that an eventual United Ireland will come with IE joining NATO (and perhaps the Commonwealth too, to appearse the Unionists).
Ireland is super interesting. Massively benefits from NATO. But stays outside, actively chirps against it, and has politicians that routinely act like Russian puppets.
 
Are you just making that up because Ireland aren't pro war and pro Nato?
View attachment 695650

Ireland's president has routinely held views that mimic Russian talking points. Or try to "both sides" the argument. Including blaming NATO for the war in Ukraine. But hey. It's a long tradition. Right up there with staying neutral during WWII. Guess they couldn't decide who the good guys were. The English were colonial pricks. So I guess it's hard to choose between them and you know, the Nazis.

They aren't at Orban levels yet. But there's still time and maybe Putin needs to up the sponsorship.

 
Ireland's president has routinely held views that mimic Russian talking points. Or try to "both sides" the argument. Including blaming NATO for the war in Ukraine. But hey. It's a long tradition. Right up there with staying neutral during WWII. Guess they couldn't decide who the good guys were. The English were colonial pricks. So I guess it's hard to choose between them and you know, the Nazis.

They aren't at Orban levels yet. But there's still time and maybe Putin needs to up the sponsorship.

Rusi.org is not an objective source
 
Rusi.org is not an objective source
Granted, RUSI is majorly funded by US and UK governments:
Screenshot_20251115-010527.png

Source: RUSI funding disclosures

Question though - is there anything factually incorrect in their article's summary of Catherine Connolly's stance on Irish defence spending and isolationism?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251115-010527.png
    Screenshot_20251115-010527.png
    241.9 KB · Views: 21
Last edited:

Back
Top