S
SD2
Guest
Some of you are ****ing stupid.
Is that so, JP?
I think you need to go over the forum rules again...
Comparing the Jays to the Twins and Athletics is pretty dumb considering they are not in the same division.
Where they're situated in the AL is irrelevant. I'm talking about the method/philosophy used in building their team. Oakland and Minnesota have managed to build rosters with considerable talent on limited budgets. How? By consistently drafting/accquiring and developing excellent young talent. This is why they're perennial contenders despite spending less than their division rivals (in Oakland's case, it's been far less), and losing FA's to larger market teams.
Yes, with a reasonable payroll like Toronto's current one, they would be able to compete and win in the Central division which Minnesota, Detroit and Chicago lie in.
With their current "reasonable" payroll they are more than capable of competitng for and winning the AL East.
But when your in a division with two teams that consist of the two highest payroll teams in the whole league, it will be tough for the Jays to compete consistently until the end of the season.
Money is not the reason why the Jays are having difficulty competing. No organization, not even the Yankees, can buy an entire team. The only way for any organization to be successful is to consistently develop young talent that can make an impact at the MLB level. The Yankees had some weaknesses this year, and everyone likes to point to the Abreu/Lidle trade...but people conveniently ignore the rise of players like Wang and Cano.
Ricciardi has been unable to develop a strong farm system...it's steadily deteriorated in his time here and is now among the worst in MLB. When players went down with injuries this year, there was no one on the farm that could come up and make a (positive) difference. Ricciardi was lucky to have a lot of talent left over from the previous regime...he's failed miserably at creating depth in organization.
As for Minnesota and Oakland, they could compete quite well in the East, especially with a payroll like the Jays. The reason they do so well is because they have a consistent stream of talent coming out of their system. They also are able to accquire great talent when they're dumping players who have become too pricey (something else Ricciardi has never been able to do).
Oakland has been a contender since 2000, despite playing in a division with payrolls just as inflated (relatively) as the Jays have to deal with in the East. In 2000 they won the division despite the highest spending team in the division spending more than twice as much as they did. The 2nd place team, the Mariners, spent nearly twice as much as they did (Boston has spent about 50% more than the Jays this year). They won the wildcard in 2001 despite Texas spending more than 2.5 times what they did. They won the division in 2002 under similar circumstances (A $40 million payroll against the $105 million high spent by Texas).
The same can be said of Minnesota.
And if you look at some of the recent World Series winners, the White Sox won last year with a payroll of about $75 million. Arizona won in 2001 and spent $80 million. The Marlins won in 2003 spending less than $50 million.
The Yankees haven't won since 2000.
The Jays will never be able to spend as much as the Yankees. Ricciardi has managed to make it seem as if the only way to compete is to spend comparable amounts. It isn't. He's just covering up for years of bad moves and terrible player devleopment, and you're buying it.
So, before labeling people "****ing stupid", why don't you actually figure out what you're talking about?




