News   Dec 05, 2025
 1K     5 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 3.3K     7 
News   Dec 05, 2025
 623     0 

Any future plans for half-mile bridge?

They did something similar with the viaduct just west of Oakville GO. Widened the viaduct to allow for a third track. That was pre-2010.
Same can be said for the Georgetown bridge over the Credit River for the 2th track. A 3rd and 4th track can go on the south side easy.
 
Same can be said for the Georgetown bridge over the Credit River for the 2th track. A 3rd and 4th track can go on the south side easy.
I hadn't realised they'd done that work on the Kitchener line already! Good to see progress!
 
I hadn't realised they'd done that work on the Kitchener line already! Good to see progress!
They expanded the piers on both sides of the existing single track back in 2010/11 with the new north side bridge being installed. The south side bridge can go in anytime when every X wants it.
6552112623_b949a6ab4e_o.jpg


2020 shot
49835648976_2c94ddcbc8_o.jpg
 
I should note, if haft mile is to be double track, a new bridge will have to be built to replace the existing one as it would be far cheaper to do it. You can build a second bridge beside the existing one, but is worth it based on the age and condition of the existing one??
 
I should note, if haft mile is to be double track, a new bridge will have to be built to replace the existing one as it would be far cheaper to do it. You can build a second bridge beside the existing one, but is worth it based on the age and condition of the existing one??

That's a very good question, but it's one that we in the spectator gallery need to not overthink, nor get too dug in on. It would take hard data on a condition assessment of the current bridge and some data-driven estimating of the alternatives - and while we may have opinions, we aren't bridge builders and we don't have the necessary data. It will likely come down to a spreadsheet exercise and none of us can predict the math.

My one observation is that those old bridges were built to last a very, very long time and there's little or no evidence that the original piers are not good for another century. I can't think of a case where a stone/masonry railway bridge in the GTA has been completely abandoned in favour of a totally new bridge... mostly we are adding sideways, or building single new spans to twin existing structures that in many cases are a century or more of age already.

If HFR turns into HSR, possibly the budget will call for twinning this bridge. If I had to bet money I would go with a) a value engineering exercise would land on maintaining only single track over this span and b) the condition assessment would say that refurbishment is all that's required. But that's pure swag. And I'm not betting my mortgate on it.

- Paul
 
Is there a chance the track could bend?
Like others I am lost by what you mean by bend the bridge. You can triple track that bridge easy by widening the existing piers and place a new bridhe or bridges beside the existing one. You can build a branch line off it with some work and why as well where too??. Since this line use to connect to CPKC mainline, its a long range protection for future use if needed.

If you want to connect the RH line, why would you do it for a short section at expensive cost???
 
You'll need to clarify what you mean by bend. Change the direction of the track or the bridge (and track) sag between bridge piers......
Like others I am lost by what you mean by bend the bridge. You can triple track that bridge easy by widening the existing piers and place a new bridhe or bridges beside the existing one. You can build a branch line off it with some work and why as well where too??. Since this line use to connect to CPKC mainline, its a long range protection for future use if needed.

If you want to connect the RH line, why would you do it for a short section at expensive cost???

@Method is quoting the monorail episode of The Simpsons
 

Back
Top