News   Dec 19, 2025
 223     0 
News   Dec 18, 2025
 1.6K     4 
News   Dec 18, 2025
 1.4K     5 

A brave and modest nation

B

Bogtrotter

Guest
I thought this was a nice article from our Brit friends.

Sunday Telegraph Article
From today's UK wires: Salute to a brave and modest nation
Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph

LONDON - Until the deaths last week of four Canadian soldiers accidentally killed by a U.S. warplane in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops were deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will now bury its dead, just as the rest of the world as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.

It seems that Canada 's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States , and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.

Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada 's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British." The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth-largest air force in the world.

The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of ourse, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.

So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.

Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.

Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular on-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia , in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.

So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan ? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac , Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. This week, four more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.
 
So this is quite an old piece. At any rate, I thought it was rather patronising.
 
I agree, alfransen. Their Albion-centric assessment of Canada's contribution to the cause of the Empire during WWI, stated as "The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle" yet followed by "its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British."" raises the question of whose "popular memory" we're talking about. The British popular memory, presumably, as if the effect of those sacrifices had no effect on Canada's popular memory or sense of independant identity from Britain.
 
I agree, alfransen. Their Albion-centric assessment of Canada's contribution to the cause of the Empire during WWI, stated as "The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle" yet followed by "its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British."" raises the question of whose "popular memory" we're talking about. The British popular memory, presumably, as if the effect of those sacrifices had no effect on Canada's popular memory or sense of independant identity from Britain.

It seemed to me as if the article was being written from a British perspective for a British audience. I don't see how he meant that's how Canadians feel.
 
I agree. He isn't giving the Canadian account of itself. Canadians are completely aware of how they have contributed to the world. He is simply stating the "other English countries" point of view where Canada's contribution is seen as a footnote in historical accounts.
 
Canada has made great contributions to peace.
It may be true that Canada is underrated (esp. in the US/UK?), but that holds true for many countries. Holland, Germany, heck, even many Eastern European countries have troops in the Middle East. In fact, my cousin left for Afghanistan today. He returned from Iraq a year ago.
I think each country is helping world peace advance as good as it can. I think it's fantastic that Dutch soldiers co-operate with Australians and Brits in the Middle East.
 
"or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers."

Not surprisingly, Vegas took her...
 
Hopefully everything that goes to Vegas stays in Vegas.
 
>Re: A brave and modest nation

Boggy: Have you had a chance to see Paul Day's terracottas at the Gardiner Museum? They're full size models for his bronze relief Battle of Britain memorial in London, which was unveiled in 2005. I was quite moved by them - they're "heroic" figurative work, but portray civilians as well as the fighter pilots. The exhibition also includes sketches and a short film. Two terracotta sections from another of Day's works - the history of Brussels - are also on display. The show runs until the 15th of this month.
 
Re: >Re: A brave and modest nation

I saw it advertised but haven't been yet. Looks like I have until next monday- thanks.
 
Re: >Re: A brave and modest nation

Free admission every Friday from 4 to 9 p.m.

And this Friday at 6 p.m. they are showing the last in a series of films that relate to Canada's participation in WW2, tied to Paul Day's exhibition.
 

Back
Top