A
adma
Guest
Well, to a degree we're talking about *iconic* quality above all else. Thus, I can see how Eiffel and S of L qualify. And somehow, by comparison, the CN Tower just seems a little too, I dunno, "That 70s" for comfort.
Okay, so Sydney Opera's also 70s (well, actually 50s, with a 70s finish date). But somehow, maybe in part because of its protracted gestation, it meets that timeless-icon mark in a way the CN Tower doesn't--though in a way that also illustrates the saccharine/hackneyed stigma such icon-making has had to bear in recent decades. But what's the alternative? Bilbao Guggenheim seems too pretentious a recent-decades choice by comparison. I guess it's the same dilemma that leads popular symphony orchestras to choose, out of necessity, an "all roads lead to Andrew Lloyd Webber" approach...
Okay, so Sydney Opera's also 70s (well, actually 50s, with a 70s finish date). But somehow, maybe in part because of its protracted gestation, it meets that timeless-icon mark in a way the CN Tower doesn't--though in a way that also illustrates the saccharine/hackneyed stigma such icon-making has had to bear in recent decades. But what's the alternative? Bilbao Guggenheim seems too pretentious a recent-decades choice by comparison. I guess it's the same dilemma that leads popular symphony orchestras to choose, out of necessity, an "all roads lead to Andrew Lloyd Webber" approach...