innsertnamehere
Superstar
Directly south of 421 Brant Street which was just approved, another developer has an application in for another 23 storey building..
Last edited:
Burlington 409 Brant Street | ?m | 18s | Reserve Properties | Graziani + Corazza
- Thread starter innsertnamehere
- Start date
I'm concerned that with all these developments, Burlington may someday get frequent bus service.
42
42
adHominem
Senior Member
Won't someone please think of the heritage? [retires to fainting couch]
OakvilleGreg1
New Member
This was a nicely scaled shopping street, with some high quality independent stores. Hopefully the city requires retail at grade here. Developers -- please don't bring in more banks, Shoppers, Dollarama. Lets some character survive.
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Amare
Senior Member
And that day will be when cows start to fly. As long as their backwards thinking city council, and residents who love to make up excuses such as: "there will be increased diesel fumes and noise" keep speaking out, I don't think any of us will be seeing the day where that city has a functioning transit system.
TheHonestMaple
Active Member
Looking at the development application it will be preserving the Kelly's Cupcake store and Schmid Albert Jewellery. There will be retail on John Street, while Brant street will be the buildings lobby.
ben.thebean1
Active Member
Approved by city council as of December 22, 2022. So far the only real update of value I can find is this page from the urban design brief, still no more renderings
More documents including plans available at https://www.burlington.ca/en/news/current-development-projects/409-brant.aspx
More documents including plans available at https://www.burlington.ca/en/news/current-development-projects/409-brant.aspx
innsertnamehere
Superstar
The NRU has noted that the developer applied for several variances (15, to be exact) in 2022 for this project, maintaining the general built form as approved in 2018 (18 storeys - could a mod update the thread title?). 13 were apparently approved by the CoA, with two being denied with relation to some proposed parking stackers.
The developer appealed the denial to the OLT, where they have now been subsequently approved. Notably, the City of Burlington appeared at the hearing in support of the appeal.
The developer appealed the denial to the OLT, where they have now been subsequently approved. Notably, the City of Burlington appeared at the hearing in support of the appeal.
