So? Neither is the hijab - there is no requirement until now for anyone to dress in a certain way for citizenship ceremony, why create a special category?
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/comm...e-naked-to-citizenship-ceremony-siddiqui.html
It's much to do about nothing - and besides, judge by actions, not dress.
It doesn't matter whether they are law-abiding or not - it's whether they are citizens. You don't decide whether to strip someone of it just because they have another passport, because then you would have created two classes of citizenship. If one is so concerned about the issue, the country should have prohibited dual-citizenship in the first place.
Besides, why stop there? Do we strip those who committed murder of their Canadian citizenship, even if they have say, an EU passport by birthright? We don't, even though the crime is henious. So why start these special categories that can't be equally applied to all now? Also, it's not like you strip it because they've lied when they applied for citizenship, in which case the basis for which becomes invalid.
Citizenship is a two way street - upon conferring it, the state have a responsibility - and it's theirs alone - for dealing with citizens who doesn't act in accordance with the law.
AoD