Search results

That's a cute exercise, but without Madison agreeing to alter their site specific bylaw or NOAC to explicitly list Vinoly as their architect (and why would they do that?), there's no way for the City to enforce that Vinoly is their architect. Even if they did, but TFAI took over completely, what...

Ugh. Rearing its ugly head down on King Street…

I'd be willing to bet significant money it was not (unless under significant pressure from the client).

I mean...

Thanks for doing this. What an absolute load of garbage. Then covering their tracks with the offer of a $1350 charge for the evidence is pretty rich...

Design work on this one started in early 2013...

No.

Why would TCHC want a micro-plate, difficult-to-construct, overpriced, hotel?

Of course not.

Vacant land shows better and holds more value than something encumbered by a lease. Again, I don't disagree. But that's not what's going on here today.

KS started general restoration in May 2015 and the rooftop addition in April 2017, @Rascacielo.

It's almost like something happened in the Toronto real estate market like 1.5 years ago that threw everything into flux... I don't disagree, but that's never going to happen. I'd love to introduce a 'tax by lot width' a la Amsterdam, but that's not the world we live in...

It's. For. Sale. \/

Capital is selling this, why would they be applying for permits?

Ah, well, nevertheless..

They have not and do not have any plans to.

Excuse me????????