Search results

Kirkor Architects

If this MZO is basically just the province given the developer land-owners whatever they want, then I would imagine that the developers would request a fairly low parking ratios. Parking stalls are expensive. I doubt the party hacks writing these MZOs have any clue what it is that they are...

On the developer's website, they have this rendering, though unsure if it is an outdated concept. https://therosseaugroup.com/portfolio-item/brant-fairview/

https://www.oakville.ca/townhall/ppn-22apr-21_1.html Submitted for SPA following settlement before the OLT. Didn't see a thread for this.

New docs dated February 2022

It must be for one of the two "Future Residential" blocks in the site plan below. Probably the eastern of the two given the Steling Road address, just north of MoCA.

Application has been submitted. Diamond Schmitt: https://www.oakville.ca/business/da-41245.html

https://pub-oakville.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=41286 It appears that following refusal and upcoming OLT appeal, city council and the developer are discussing various settlement options, including a 13-storey and a 10-storey option. The three options can be found here with...

Recommended for approval. https://pub-oakville.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=41303 New rendering?

Yup. I've deduced that each of the three SPA's correspond to a different block in the master plan. The 22-storey SPA is for a standalone building. The 46-storey SPA is shared with the 39-storey building. The 24-storey SPA is shared between four buildings, three of which are mid-rises. The...

Still haven't seen any docs stating that a portion of this project is rental now that Fitzrovia and AIMco are involved, however, on the Fitzrovia site this project is now listed with three of the six market towers mentioned.

Looks as though three SPA applications were filed

Docs are up. Just one rendering.

If it is R-Hauz, then this should be a prefab site.

No proposed parking is awesome to see at this site, though I would see the utility of having more than one car share spot for residents.

From the docs:

This site was highlighted in one of Crombie REIT's investor reports as having near-term redevelopment potential. Crombie is CC'd on the cover letter in the development application.

Based on the project website, the heights are different compared to the Site Plan documents in the AIC.

Now with marketing name and renderings: https://danielshomes.ca/details/daniels-on-parliament/

It appears that this is under new ownership again, and to be launched as a condo after all. https://www.gattacahomes.com/nuewest https://www.nuewestcondos.ca/ Seems to be the same design.