News   Feb 13, 2026
 942     2 
News   Feb 13, 2026
 2.7K     1 
News   Feb 13, 2026
 4.6K     0 

Toronto Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

Some final thoughts: Firstly they couldn't find the 1994 report so the final part of the Eglinton West story is missing.

The original 80's era LRT proposal didn't include a connection to the airport as at the time Metro was more focused on a possible extension to Mississauga City Centre and a diversion north to Pearson would preclude such an extension. As well the report noted that service to Pearson could be adequately handled by express buses from Renforth Station.

You'll also notice that the proposal for the surface section of the EW was to run down the middle of Eglinton Ave (which would be expanded to 6 lanes), although the stops at Kipling, Islington, and Royal York would be underground. So it would dive underground at major intersections to avoid them, but maintain grade-crossings with minor roads.

It may be hard to see but if you look at the plates you can see that the tunnelled section of the route were going to be very shallow (probably like Queens Quay Station). The route itself would only be tunnelled between Jane and West Side Mall, where it would come to the surface and run along the Belt Line ROW to a point just west of Marlee where it would dive underground again to serve Eglinton West Station.

Also you can see that the recommendation was for the line to be built as a BRT first and then converted to LRT when ridership demanded.

The line would have used coupled ALRV's running as a 4 car set with a frequency of 3.5 minutes which would offer a capacity of 10,000pphpd. This could be increased to 16,000pphph if cars ran every 2 minutes. BRT service would be served by 60' Articulated busses, and it was estimated the line would run 100 buses an hour.

By 1992 the route had solidified as an entirely underground route although there was still ambiguity about whether the line would be a heavy rail subway or LRT as both are referenced. That said it seems by that point they were leaning towards heavy rail as the report noted among other things that the TTC wanted to avoid introducing a new vehicle type to the network, and subway cars could be stored at Wilson Yard thus negating the need for a new Yard on the EW.

They did examine building elevated and at-grade alignments for the EW west of York Centre however these were dropped due to "Natural and Social Environment" concerns (you can probably figure out what that means....)

For whatever reason when examining a street level LRT in the 90's they omitted the grade separation possibility at major intersection like what was proposed in the 80's, and just looked at it as a pure street-level LRT (like the Crosstown in the east end).

Another thing to note is that by 1992 they hadn't actually figured out an alignment to the airport and 2 were being examined, one to Renforth and then north to the Airport, and another north up Hwy 27 and then west along Dixon to the Airport.

Finally it was recommended that the route be built in 2 phases, with phase one being a subway (of some description) between Eglinton West and York Centre. Service west of York Centre to Renforth would be handled by a busway until the extension to Renforth and the Airport could be built.

And of course in not one of these reports is there any mention of an eastern extension to Yonge and into Scarborough. Not saying it would never happen but from the lines conception to its cancellation there was never any consideration given to an eastern extension.
 
Last edited:
I figured my first "Metropass hack" this morning: instead of taking the northbound Weston Rd bus straight into Mt Dennis station, I scampered out of the bus at Weston & Eglinton and across the street into the W station entrance. Still a pretty long walk; but probably (at least at my brisk pace) less time to get to the Crosstown platform than had I stayed on the bus all the way to the loop and done a long walk from *there*...
 
Spoken like someone who has never seen a modern light rail line anywhere other than Toronto. Calgary, Edmonton, Los Angeles, Seattle, they all use grade separations at major intersections.

Ultimately when we're saying "X intersection should have had a flyover/flyunder" the purpose is to highlight lessons learned for future lines.

If we pretend that the existing line is above criticisms because it exists, we are doomed to keep repeating the same mistakes.

The only flyunder I would have liked to see would have been Victoria Park–Eglinton Square–Pharmacy, with a below-grade stop with stairs and elevators on both the VP and Eg Square sides. Would have avoided three lights and simplified traffic operations.

Otherwise the on-street operation in Scarborough isn’t that bad. But with all the lights in close proximity now, it does slow things by about three minutes more than necessary.
 
Here's some of the shots I took on Sunday:

Z8P_0304 copy.jpg
Z8P_0366 copy.jpg
Z8P_0393 copy.jpg
Z8P_0407 copy.jpg
Z8P_0411 copy.jpg
Z8P_0461 copy.jpg
Z8P_0553 copy.jpg
Z8P_0728 copy.jpg
Z8P_0787 copy.jpg
Z8P_0844 copy.jpg
 
A friend reported a situation during this evening's commute.

They arrived to find a standoff occurring at Cedarvale station. The ATC would not drive into the station platform unless people stood clear off the platform edge. Apparently, a teenager was trolling by jumping on the platform edge whenever the vehicle attempted to drive into the station causing the vehicle to halt. My friend arrived at the same time as station staff did, whereupon the teenager fled. Supposedly, the train had been in the tunnel for 7 minutes by that point, and waited another 5 minutes at Cedarvale afterwards to ensure the track was clear.

I find it crazy that we built a brand new line with ATC but didn't put in platform screen doors. The human factor is easily one of the biggest source of delays on the existing rapid transit network, and it could have been largely mitigated.
 
I find it crazy that we seem to be the only city dealing with such things. How do other cities handle this as they have teenagers too. Why can’t we just manually override ATC and move the train slowly into the station.
 
I find it crazy that we seem to be the only city dealing with such things. How do other cities handle this as they have teenagers too. Why can’t we just manually override ATC and move the train slowly into the station.
They have similar delays, you just don’t hear about them if you don’t use the system. New York for example has ample disruptions due to mischief. The most common, I noticed at least, was activating the emergency brakes on a train. Train surfing also became popular for a while.
 
The only flyunder I would have liked to see would have been Victoria Park–Eglinton Square–Pharmacy, with a below-grade stop with stairs and elevators on both the VP and Eg Square sides. Would have avoided three lights and simplified traffic operations.

Otherwise the on-street operation in Scarborough isn’t that bad. But with all the lights in close proximity now, it does slow things by about three minutes more than necessary.
How would this look if it went under Leslie, and then under Don Mills, then under DVP ramps, and then under VicPark/Pharmacy, and then under Kennedy - if you take the cumulative suggestion of the UT community. At some point you have to ask that if the majority of the line is grade-separated and it is going up and down like a yo-yo to get around problem spots - may as well build the whole thing as grade-separated.
 
Bit off topic (and I rarely post to begin with) but I quite appreciate the creativity with your watermarks in the images. It’s almost like a Where’s Waldo of trying to find your name in each photo!

I do plan on riding the line end-to-end at some point in the near future, although I haven’t found time for it yet.
 
I find it crazy that we built a brand new line with ATC but didn't put in platform screen doors. The human factor is easily one of the biggest source of delays on the existing rapid transit network, and it could have been largely mitigated.
Not only for human factors... much of the stations I visited on Sunday were cold- but in particular, the stations closest to the portals were freezing! Mount Dennis was so cold (On opening day they had a stand offering coffee- and I observed frozen coffee on the ground lol) and the entire station sans the waiting area in building no. 9 is exposed to the elements via... you guessed it... the line 5 platforms.
 

Back
Top