News   Mar 28, 2025
Missing Colour
 28     0 
News   Mar 27, 2025
Valhalla Village Phase 1 Progresses, Bringing Affordable Units to Etobicoke
 683     2 
News   Mar 27, 2025
Trio of Towers Proposed Across From Erin Mills Town Centre
 1.2K     1 

Alto - High Speed Rail (Toronto-Quebec City)

Metroscapes said:
I would question any Alto link to Pearson with "why the hell did we build the UP Express?" There's also no way "the milk run" should be first in line for high speed service to Windsor, especially while Aldershot is a good hub to connect to Niagara and Buffalo.
Click to expand...

A HSR west in ON would likely go to Aldershot and through Pearson.The question is which one will go on to London and beyond, or if it will be both.
 
micheal_can said:
... or single track across Canada? Sorry,I couldn't resist.

Maybe some sections will be 4 tracks to allow local passenger and freight trains to operate without blocking HSR trains. It would not surprise me if the HSR is double track the entire distance. Just like how single direction trains are no longer a normal thing, neither are new built tracks.
Click to expand...
yea the local passenger service will be important too
 
Metroscapes said:
Sorry, showing up late to this thread, so don't take these as direct replies so much as springboards for my points.

Counterpoint is that Yonge and Eglinton can be generally defined as midtown, and including St Clair. Summerhill is a grey boundary IMO.


Summerhill has long been contemplated as a relief station for Union, has it not? l I also reject the notions that GO trains through Summerhill and other spots along North Toronto / Belleville subs are merely 'interesting' or that it isn't something we can't be serious about.


Agreed, but I can see a link between frequent users of high speed rail to Ottawa and the Summerhill area, but that's a crass sentiment on my part.
Click to expand...
What point are you trying to make with regards to Summerhill which I haven’t already addressed below?
Urban Sky said:
Exactly: if you already have frequent commuter rail service to Union Station (i.e., at least one train every 15 minutes), additional services to midtown can be a useful addition to minimize travel times for a minority of passengers (i.e., for those for which Summerhill is more convenient than Union Station). Given that frequencies for intercity services are much less frequent, using Summerhill instead of Union Station for HSR (even a subset of the trips offered!) would be insanely stupid and nothing any serious investor would commit billions of dollars for…
Click to expand...
 
Metroscapes said:
Summerhill has long been contemplated as a relief station for Union, has it not? l I also reject the notions that GO trains through Summerhill and other spots along North Toronto / Belleville subs are merely 'interesting' or that it isn't something we can't be serious about.
Click to expand...

In a hand-wavy sense on forums it has. The primary issue is the TTC Yonge line (or University line for that matter) cannot add a non-trivial number of transfers from a Summerhill (or Dupont) stop. Eglinton and St. Clair transfers already fill peak-direction rush-hour TTC trains; and those are exactly the trains a mid-town user would be looking to catch.

Realistically, for a mid-town line to feed office workers into downtown at even 10% of Union's capacity [anything less is not providing Union relief] will require something like a Bay subway line to be built.
 
Last edited:
rbt said:
In a hand-wavy sense on forums; not for any realistic trip. The primary issue is the Yonge line (or University for that matter) cannot add a non-trivial number of transfers from a Summerhill stop. Eglinton and St. Clair transfers already fill peak-direction rush-hour TTC trains; and those are exactly the trains a mid-town user would be looking to catch.

Realistically, for a mid-town line to feed office workers into downtown at even 10% of Union's capacity [anything less is not providing Union relief] will require something like a Bay subway line to be built.
Click to expand...
I have always wondered why a line straight up Bay - Avenue - Bathurst would make sense, but it still does not make Summerhill area or the Midtown Corridor more attractive than Union.
 
Admiral Beez said:
I thought that the high speed rail from Toronto to Ottawa and Montreal was to replace VIA’s current service from Union Station. Are we seriously looking at reducing Union Station to a GoTrain and subway stop?
Click to expand...
My understanding is the existing Via service and frequencies are going to be maintained. They will still be out of Union. As far as ALTO,my expectation is it will also serve Union.
 
Admiral Beez said:
I thought that the high speed rail from Toronto to Ottawa and Montreal was to replace VIA’s current service from Union Station. Are we seriously looking at reducing Union Station to a GoTrain and subway stop?
Click to expand...
Thank you for highlighting the absurdity of the irrational obsession with Summerhill as a “downtown” terminus for ALTO! Some people in this thread seriously struggle with the idea that providing a single-seat downtown-to-downtown ride is the key competitive edge of intercity rail and that airlines are much better at providing fast random-suburb-to-random-suburb connections…
 
Admiral Beez said:
I thought that the high speed rail from Toronto to Ottawa and Montreal was to replace VIA’s current service from Union Station.
Click to expand...
The current services would continue from Union Station. Kingston to Ottawa, Montreal, and Toronto services would continue to run along the existing tracks.
 
Metroscapes said:
I would question any Alto link to Pearson with "why the hell did we build the UP Express?"
Click to expand...
There was no high speed rail being planned in the early 2010s. The value of high speed trains going directly to hub airports is that they replace a lot of short connecting flights from places like Ottawa. I suspect that Air Canada's involvement signals that this will be an important part of the business model of Alto.
 
MisterF said:
There was no high speed rail being planned in the early 2010s. The value of high speed trains going directly to hub airports is that they replace a lot of short connecting flights from places like Ottawa. I suspect that Air Canada's involvement signals that this will be an important part of the business model of Alto.
Click to expand...

Trudeau/Dorval airport in Montreal will definitely have integration, but Pearson is an long way for anyone east of Peterborough and nobody west of Oshawa will take infrequent HSR (compared to GO service) to get to Pearson. There is lots of spare capacity at Trudeau for additional flights.
 
Last edited:
rbt said:
Trudeau/Dorval airport in Montreal will definitely have integration, but Pearson is an long way for anyone east of Peterborough and nobody west of Oshawa will take infrequent HSR (compared to GO service) to get to Pearson. There is lots of spare capacity at Trudeau for additional flights.
Click to expand...
With the HSR linking the 3 cities, the 70+flights between them out of Pearson could be slashed. That would open up a lot more capacity.
 
micheal_can said:
My understanding is the existing Via service and frequencies are going to be maintained. They will still be out of Union. As far as ALTO,my expectation is it will also serve Union.
Click to expand...
Why would anyone take VIA from Union to Montreal when you can do the same with HSR?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top