News   Apr 26, 2024
 454     1 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 202     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 668     0 

Downtown Brampton Flood Protection Project - Environmental Assessment

Northern Light

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 20, 2007
Messages
31,896
Reaction score
89,485
Location
Toronto/EY
The TRCA has a preferred alternative for addressing flooding concerns in Downtown Brampton.

The importance of this is that upon these being addressed it will be possible for Downtown Brampton to densify with new residential development, currently restricted due to its location within a regulatory floodplain.

The recommendations are:

The overall preferred alternative consists of the following components to improve conveyance (Figure 3):

Upstream:

Widening (to 50 m) and deepening (by 1.2 m) the by-pass channel
Re-aligning Ken Whillans Drive and re-grading Church Street and the valley north of Church Street
Bridge replacements at Church Street, Scott Street, and Queen StreetoModifications to the CN rail bridge,
Relocation or replacement of the pedestrian bridge in Centennial Park

Downstream:

Do-Nothing approach was selected as it was determined that none of the downstream alternative solutions would eliminate the downstream spill, the upstream alternative solution
would have a positive impact on the downstream spill, and the limited benefit of implementing any of the downstream alternative solutions does not outweigh the impacts and cost.

The solution looks like this:

1593020434315.png



The full report is here:

 
The EA has been approved, and Brampton is set to move forward with detailed design of 'River Walk' and the associated flood protection for Downtown Brampton.

Media Release is here:

 
Minister McKenna announced 40% funding today for the project. I believe the City is picking up the remainder.


TRCA CAO said in the Q and A that detailed design will now commence.

This is really great to see moving forward on so many levels.

Its necessary to allow new residential intensification in downtown Brampton in a material way.

Once completed it opens up the opportunity for a very substantial investment in Downtown Brampton.

It also benefits the environment, creating additional natural parklands/floodplains and removing creek from a concrete ditch.

It does that while also boosting quality of life, creating a new walking/cycling corridor alongside nature that will boost the aesthetic value, the air quality, and also the pleasantness of day to day life.

I don't want to oversell it; but it really is a great project; subject to the design being done right!
 

Attachments

  • 1696982345119.png
    1696982345119.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 26
  • 1696982388288.png
    1696982388288.png
    124.7 KB · Views: 28
Last edited:
Staff recommendations and report adopted by Committee of Council and no reason to think it won't be adopted at full Council. Report here and Attachment 1 here. Two more properties will be expropriated.

Current Situation: A change is required to the preferred engineering solution for providing flood protection in Downtown Brampton. As described in the approved EA, providing additional capacity to ensure flows in the Etobicoke Creek during extreme storm events can be safely conveyed without flooding requires the CN Rail crossing over Etobicoke Creek be widened or otherwise expanded to allow more water to pass under the railway line. As per the EA, this would involve the installation of large culverts that would be located on property currently owned by Catholic Cemeteries & Funeral Services and substantially impact those lands. An alternative solution to avoid impacting the cemetery was successfully identified during detailed design of the flood protection works, but requires additional property be acquired as identified in Attachment 1.

This change in the engineering solution allowing the project to avoid impacts to the cemetery provides increased certainty around the schedule of the DBFP, avoids costs associated with the closure and relocation of the cemetery, and avoids a lengthy and complicated regulatory process.

The authorization being sought in this report, to acquire property interests byexpropriation, is the first step in the expropriation process. As this project is tied to the federal Government’s Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Funding and the timelines established thereunder, staff have identified as accurately as possible the fee simple property interests required based on an amendment to the EA which accounts for design/construction issues with CN Rail and St. Mary’s Catholic Cemetery. Another report will be presented to Council to seek approval of the property interests to be expropriated, after Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate Land have been served/published and Hearings of Necessity, if any, have been completed.

1706733007383.png

I've created this map to show the properties. I assume the part of 100 John St that will be taken is where the black arrow is located. 30 John St is highlighted in red.

1706732954383.png
 

Attachments

  • 1706731775199.png
    1706731775199.png
    59.6 KB · Views: 9
Staff recommendations and report adopted by Committee of Council and no reason to think it won't be adopted at full Council. Report here and Attachment 1 here. Two more properties will be expropriated.



View attachment 536853
I've created this map to show the properties. I assume the part of 100 John St that will be taken is where the black arrow is located. 30 John St is highlighted in red.

View attachment 536852

Your assumptions make sense to me. The intent here is an enlarged culvert on the west side of the creek, the culvert obviously will be open to the creek/flood flows on both sides.

Its not inconceivable that they would require some lands further north, but that seems improbable. Flood waters don't like hard turns. But there appears to be room to gently take the creek or overflow waters over a bit.
 
Media piece on this project discussing complaints by some of those facing expropriation that the City and their Councillor have been mum on timelines and impacts.


Lending credibility to the residents, neither the City of Brampton nor the Councillor bothered getting back to the media!

I happen to think this is an important project, and one which should move forward; I don't agree with every aspect of the design chosen, but I digress; I see no reason for the City or the Councillor
to be so tactless in how they are handling the matter.
 
Be careful about posting anything from The Pointer. It’s headed by a fired Toronto Star reporter who is allied with the old guard conservative councillors like ex councillor Elaine Moore. He was anti-LRT in 2015 and he is not going to get comments from progressive councillors like Santos and Vicente. .
 
Thanks for sharing the RFP, good to see these diagrams:


1712961373053.png
1712961610009.png


Riverwalk portion mentioned is for phase 1, there's also phase 2 north of this and a phase 3.
1712962398694.png




Be careful about posting anything from The Pointer. It’s headed by a fired Toronto Star reporter who is allied with the old guard conservative councillors like ex councillor Elaine Moore. He was anti-LRT in 2015 and he is not going to get comments from progressive councillors like Santos and Vicente. .

Brampton is the only GTA city with a Nimby old guard who control their own media outlet to get their interests back in power and slander progressives on a daily basis. They have also been able to penetrate other news platforms like Global through former Pointer reporter Isaac Callan and CBC Brampon Bureau has been republishing The Pointers old 2022 election hit pieces through Saloni Bughra. San Grewal is backed by Federal dollars under the local journalism initiative with his weaponized platform and launches rookie journalists to other organizations who he pulls strings with. Hopefully his funding dries up after 2025 election. Always have to check sources for Brampton reporting beyond face value.
 

Back
Top