hw621
Senior Member
Who is surprised?"Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report"
![]()
Gift-redeem
www.thestar.com
Who is surprised?"Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report"
![]()
Gift-redeem
www.thestar.com
Is this that timeline from last year?"Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report"
![]()
Gift-redeem
www.thestar.com
Really is no end to the shame that they have brought to the gta. These 118 vps have bait and switched everyone. They deserve to all be fired and sent down to the lower income bracketIs this that timeline from last year?
View attachment 724634
"Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report"
![]()
Gift-redeem
www.thestar.com
"Metrolinx’s $27B GO Expansion delayed and scaled back: confidential report"
![]()
Gift-redeem
www.thestar.com
Is this that timeline from last year?
View attachment 724634
This is a choice by unmotivated management; and by politicians who clearly don't view anything here as a legacy project, and most will be deceased (of old age) by the time its delivered.
A good read above from @atakagi1
Yes.
And when you look at it you can't help but feel contempt for Phil Verster and the senior Mx team and their board.
Its not merely the delay or scaling back of electrification; though certainly, that's significant and unfortunate.
Its that signal work in the USRC wont' be complete until 2037! . And track work in the LSE Corridor is ongoing through 2035. SMH, who is anyone trying to fool? Its not a matter of hitting construction times comparable to China. Nor even 1/2 that.
Its taking projects that were promised to be substantially complete as early as 2024, and delivering them up to 14 years later. Its taking project components that are straight forward (like track) that involve no novel technology, and could, even in 2 or 3 phases, be delivered in a maximum of six years (I'd argue for 3 for any given line) ....and managing to stretch that time line by a factor of 3 (after a delayed start to construction).
This is a choice by unmotivated management; and by politicians who clearly don't view anything here as a legacy project, and most will be deceased (of old age) by the time its delivered.
The sad part is no one is going to do anything about it. Nothing is going to change...Sadly, ML has become a Photo Op factory that builds and runs trains in its spare time.
The telling comment for me was when the 401 tunnels were cited by the ML spokesperson as a sign of progress being made. They are a stranded asset that was paid off years ago and still are not in operation. The sequencing of work on ML projects is fundamentally incompetent.
And the Ready, Aim, Aim, Aim..... approach to project scope is also deplorable.
And then there's procurement.....
Somebody needs to remind ML that these projects are not hobby farms.... they are a commitment to the taxpayers who need mobility.
- Paul
Is Thug even aware of this? He always seems to get outraged by government inefficiency...A good read above from @atakagi1
Yes.
And when you look at it you can't help but feel contempt for Phil Verster and the senior Mx team and their board.
Its not merely the delay or scaling back of electrification; though certainly, that's significant and unfortunate.
Its that signal work in the USRC wont' be complete until 2037! . And track work in the LSE Corridor is ongoing through 2035. SMH, who is anyone trying to fool? Its not a matter of hitting construction times comparable to China. Nor even 1/2 that.
Its taking projects that were promised to be substantially complete as early as 2024, and delivering them up to 14 years later. Its taking project components that are straight forward (like track) that involve no novel technology, and could, even in 2 or 3 phases, be delivered in a maximum of six years (I'd argue for 3 for any given line) ....and managing to stretch that time line by a factor of 3 (after a delayed start to construction).
This is a choice by unmotivated management; and by politicians who clearly don't view anything here as a legacy project, and most will be deceased (of old age) by the time its delivered.
I believe he (and his government) are a large part of the cause. They view announcements as successIs Thug even aware of this? He always seems to get outraged by government inefficiency...
I hope the oppositions question them in the parliament on this...I believe he (and his government) are a large part of the cause. They view announcements as success
Here's roughly how it would goI hope the oppositions question them in the parliament on this...
**Big upgrades** to the small creek construction zone on the April 11-12 closure. A few more concrete blocks will be placed to hold the signal mast in place south of Agincourt. /sbut no, you see, building a bridge over a small creek is such an immeasurably complicated task that it takes multiple generations of workers, design, and negotiations in order to complete!
What are they doing? It looks pretty much finished to me ... even the boardwalk on the north has been reinstated, and I see no fences - including no silt fences - in the south side. I should walk along that new boardwalk.**Big upgrades** to the small creek construction zone on the April 11-12 closure.




