News   Dec 19, 2025
 1.4K     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 979     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 1.4K     1 

Toronto Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

To be fair, that was posted 3 years ago.

Before MX handed operations of Line 5 over to the TTC, they should have posted a more recent video demonstrating how fast the trams can travel underground. Including a speedometer, etc. That way, should the trams travel slower under TTC operations, MX can rightfully put the blame on the TTC for slow operations and riders know who to call out.

But I suppose that ship sailed on December 5th.
 
Wild guessing here, but it appears the train is not hitting 80 km/h all the time, but this was 3 years ago, maybe an ION operator could chime in on what speeds they're hitting on the digital speedometer?

1765825145303.png

1765825202593.png

1765825491156.png
 
Last edited:
If we’re to read between the lines, square that with Matlow’s own statement:

“The TTC is often told, rather than consulting with the Metrolinx organization, that it is accountable only to premier [Doug] Ford and the transportation minister, it seems, rather than us and the people of Toronto,” he said. “The behaviour of Metrolinx has been bullyish.”
Inferring from a selective quote, along with vibes and moral judgements due to political bias does not come close to any standard of proof, and is unconvincing even for Urban Toronto.
 
Last edited:
The TTC seems to be going out of it's way to make this line as slow as humanely possible but, once again, who controls the TTC? The City! The TTC is just a glorified branch of City Hall. They control their budget and when you control the money, you control. Full stop. The TTC has to do what the City tells them to do.

This is NOT a operational issue but a political one and the blame lies at the foot of City Hall.
 
Okay, so so far the only evidence I have seen that the TTC is not at fault for slow ops is that they are claiming that *any* operational change of 6 FW needs to be OK'd with Metrolinx and Mosaic.

Despite this, Metrolinx has disagreed and said they can just go and do TSP if they want to, sans approval from Mosaic.

Can anyone actually explain what is going on here? Has the TTC even *attempted* to ask Mosaic if they can enable TSP or faster ops, or is this just an excuse from TTC to do nothing?
I think we’re mostly dealing with semantics.

From my perspective, because Metrolinx owns the vehicles and infrastructure and holds the contract with Mosaic, Metrolinx is the sole party who can direct Mosaic on any potential change. Any change from the baseline contract Mosaic will treat as a contract variation, and the change will be scoped and priced and charged back to Metrolinx. On that basis, TTC isn't permitted to deal with Mosaic directly without Metrolinx in the loop, which is why TTC is saying they need to confirm with both Metrolinx and Mosaic that they have permission to proceed.

That said, if Metrolinx’s contract already includes specific performance requirements, and Mosaic has already demonstrated that the delivered infrastructure can meet them, then there’s no change to authorize. Unless the change falls outside the project specifications, nothing new needs to be requested from Mosaic or approved by Metrolinx, because the capability is presumably already part of what was contracted, delivered, and accepted.

In my opinion, TTC’s statement that they need to discuss with Metrolinx and Mosaic was simply cautious and appropriately courteous (although perhaps a symptom of a general observation that TTC staff haven't fully wrapped their heads around how to work in an AFP setting and what changes are viable versus not). It would be awkward for TTC to appear to make absolute statements regarding what can and can't be done with infrastructure they don't own, even if they know the infrastructure already supports whatever performance the contract specifies. If Mosaic hadn’t delivered to the required specifications, the project wouldn’t have been accepted. And if anything sits outside the letter of the contract, it becomes a variation, paid by Metrolinx, regardless of who initiates the request.
 
He wants it faster, but not to affect traffic. A have your cake and eat it too situation.

I don't think any Ontario or city government even gave a passing thought to giving line 5 absolute priority, like Calgary or Edmonton with crossing gates and flashing lights

Well, then he does not want it faster. He just wants to say he wants it faster. He has many options at his disposal, and the only think he seems to be doing is saying he wants it faster.
 
You've got us. We are all Ford lovers here. I guess you've missed the endless praise for our dear leader in his very own 13,000+ post thread - https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/threads/premier-doug-fords-ontario.28523
I am not aware of that forum. The thing is, I am seeing some on here that are saying he is pro transit among other things. It isn't everyone, but, still it is still enough. At best, he is neutral on transit. At worst,he is one of the worst Premiers in our history. When I think of the worst Premiers they all seem to be PCs.
 
I am not aware of that forum. The thing is, I am seeing some on here that are saying he is pro transit among other things. It isn't everyone, but, still it is still enough. At best, he is neutral on transit. At worst,he is one of the worst Premiers in our history. When I think of the worst Premiers they all seem to be PCs.
You can literally pin point the beginning of the demise of Toronto (and Ontario) with the election of Doug Ford in 2018.

He is running the province into the ground while he fills his own pockets (and his donors pockets too)
 
I am not aware of that forum. The thing is, I am seeing some on here that are saying he is pro transit among other things. It isn't everyone, but, still it is still enough. At best, he is neutral on transit. At worst,he is one of the worst Premiers in our history. When I think of the worst Premiers they all seem to be PCs.
I haven't seem any Premier do anything like he's done on Transit since Premier Davis, and I think he's surpassed that. He may even be exceeding Premier Robarts - who was truly transformational.

It doesn't mean I respect him, or would ever vote for him.
 
I haven't seem any Premier do anything like he's done on Transit since Premier Davis, and I think he's surpassed that. He may even be exceeding Premier Robarts - who was truly transformational.

It doesn't mean I respect him, or would ever vote for him.
So, filling in a subway... this subway is better?
 

Back
Top