News   Dec 05, 2025
 284     1 
News   Dec 04, 2025
 892     1 
News   Dec 04, 2025
 1.1K     2 

President Donald Trump's United States of America

What are "stagnating living standards", anyway? And might the US per-capita stat be skewed by the obscenely filthy rich few? Canada isn't exactly a sexy living location for tech & investment zillionaires, after all--take away the top 1% from the US and Canada respectively, and there might be greater parity...
I think this is what he's referring to.


Chart 1 presents Canada’s real GDP per capita over the last four decades, along with a measure of long‑term trend growth (and a linear extrapolation of the long-term trend out to 2033). Since 1981, real GDP per capita has grown at an average annual rate of 1.1%, increasing from about $36,900 per person to $58,100 per person in inflation-adjusted dollars. The shock of the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with falling per capita output in recent quarters, has left real GDP per capita 7% below its long-term trend, equating to a decline of about $4,200 per person.Note To return to its pre-pandemic trend over the next decade, GDP per capita would need to grow at an average annual rate of 1.7% per year.

I think there's no question that growth in standards of living for most Canadians have fallen behind many of our peers in the last 5-10 years (though many also have the same challenges as Canada). In the US, by contrast, despite the rhetoric from everybody that the country is broke and nobody can afford anything, real incomes have risen quite dramatically at all income levels in the last five years.
 
^On today's edition of the latest Trump meltdown... continuing to circulate the myth about Biden and the autopen, and cancelling Biden's executive orders claiming they were all done by an autopen, and calling the Governor of Minnesota a bad word...
Maybe someone can wake up Biden and have him publicly discount this statement?
 
Now he's issuing NOTAMs. Whatta guy!


Actually, unilaterally declaring control of another country's sovereign airspace sounds awfully like a declaration of war. In a normal America, Congress might want to have a word.
 
Last edited:
The Ex-President Whom Trump Plans to Pardon Flooded America With Cocaine (NYT)

Link to article

Trump is planning to pardon former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who was convicted in a US court for drug trafficking and sentenced to 25 years. This, at a time when Trump is blowing up boats in the Caribbean, suspected of running drugs, and is threatening to bomb Venezuela next. You can't make this up!

Excerpt

"He once boasted that he would 'stuff the drugs up the gringos’ noses.” He accepted a $1 million bribe from El Chapo to allow cocaine shipments to pass through Honduras. A man was killed in prison to protect him.

Prosecutors said Mr. Hernández was key to a scheme that lasted more than 20 years and brought more than 500 tons of cocaine into the United States."


Countless Americans must have died from overdoses over the 20 years Hernández was flooding the US with cocaine, and Trump is going to pardon him because he heard Hernández was treated very unfairly.
 

Russian style shaming of journalists has arrived...
 

Inside Trump’s Push to Make the White House Ballroom as Big as Possible​

President Trump’s ever-growing vision has caused tension with contractors. His architect has taken a step back as the president personally manages the project.

As President Trump took a stroll on the White House roof in August, generating headlines and questions about what he was up to, the man walking beside him was little noticed.
Wearing his signature bow tie, James McCrery, a classical architect who runs a small Washington firm known for its work building Catholic churches, was discussing how to execute Mr. Trump’s vision for a ballroom on the White House grounds.

Mr. McCrery’s work has been embraced by conservatives who believe federal buildings should be designed with an eye toward the grandeur of ancient Greek and Roman structures. He often talks of how his design work is carried out in service of God and the church, according to people who have worked with him.
It might have seemed an odd pairing: a man who designs cathedrals working for a man who once built casinos, and is now president of the United States.

But McCrery Architects got to work on the initial drawings for the project, sketching out a design with high ceilings and arched windows reminiscent of Versailles’s Hall of Mirrors. It would have the latest security features, including bulletproof glass. Gold furniture, known to please the president, was added to the renderings.
It was flashy enough to impress a man of Mr. Trump’s tastes, while largely matching the style of the historic White House without overshadowing it. That’s when things got tricky.

In offering up his initial design, Mr. McCrery could not have known that Mr. Trump’s vision for the project was growing. What started as a 500-seat ballroom connected to the East Wing grew to 650 seats. Next, he wanted a 999-seat ballroom, then room for 1,350. Even as Mr. Trump assured the public in July that the ballroom would not touch the existing structure, he already had approved plans to demolish the East Wing to make way for something that could hold several thousand people, according to three people familiar with the timeline.

The latest plan, which officials said was still preliminary, calls for a ballroom much larger than the West Wing and the Executive Mansion. Mr. Trump has said publicly that he would like a ballroom big enough to hold a crowd for a presidential inauguration.


The size of the project was not the only issue raising alarms. Mr. Trump also told people working on the ballroom that they did not need to follow permitting, zoning or code requirements because the structure is on White House grounds, according to three people familiar with his comments. (The firms involved have insisted on following industry standards.)

In recent weeks, Mr. McCrery has pulled back from day-to-day involvement in the project, two people familiar with the matter told The New York Times. They emphasized that Mr. McCrery was still involved as a consultant on the design and proud to be working for Mr. Trump.

A White House official acknowledged that there had been disagreements between Mr. Trump and Mr. McCrery, a dynamic first reported by the Washington Post.
Through a representative, Mr. McCrery declined requests for an interview. This account of Mr. Trump’s personal drive to undertake one of the most significant renovations in the history of the White
House is based on interviews with five people with knowledge of the project, most of whom asked for anonymity to discuss private conversations, along with the president’s own statements and planning documents released by the White House.


 
Russian style shaming of journalists has arrived...
Having closely followed the Russian decline into Putin's authoritarian kleptocracy over the past 25 years, I estimate that Trump's USA is about 15 years behind Russia in terms of dismantling its democracy. The litmus test will come in 2028: if Trump is elected for the third term, US will have accelerated its speed run and would be only 10 years behind Russia at that point.
 
On This World AIDS Day, The U.S. Declines To Participate


The United States will not formally commemorate World AIDS Day this year. This decision comes on the heels of recent federal funding cuts that threaten to disrupt hard-earned progress combatting this global epidemic. Despite significant scientific advancements in HIV treatment and prevention, many people worry about our efforts to end this ongoing crisis.

This year, the U.S. State Department sent an email to employees that stated, “The U.S. Government will not be commemorating World AIDS Day this year.”

One could argue that a day of commemoration does not save lives. But funding does. And the HIV/AIDS funding landscape has changed dramatically during the Trump administration. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS, noted in a recently released report that, “this year’s disruption to the global response has exposed the fragility of the progress we have fought so hard to achieve.”

The numbers are stark. According to the UNAIDS report, 60% of women-led HIV organizations have been significantly impacted by recent funding disruptions. The number of people accessing pre-exposure prophylaxis has dropped in numerous countries. NGOs in the U.S. and globally have scaled back their services because of a loss of funding. The result? The number of new HIV infections per year could rise after several years of declines.

 

Back
Top