News   Dec 19, 2025
 1K     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 761     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 1.1K     0 

Toronto Ravine Strategy

In a report to the May 25 meeting of Infrastructure and Environment Ctte we learn all the nothing has been done to deliver the Ravine Strategy over the last 3 years.

I will dissect below, but first the report:


Soooo, the report starts with lots back patting about all the great accomplishments...............I will offer my take in red:

This report provides the first three-year update to City Council on advancement of the
Ravine Strategy and an update on the implementation of key next steps including:

• Accomplishments towards the Ravine Strategy guiding principles and actions,
and achievements to date in ravine restoration and management, and capital
coordination and delivery

Nothing, endless talk, mostly in-house

• The strategic advancement of Toronto's Ravine Campaign, including the Loop
Trail, InTO the Ravines, and recommendations for the Ravine Campaign
Leadership Table

The eyeroll here is huge; hey, in fairness they've spent 2 years getting to the point of recommending closing the Humber Gap, that is something, assuming they actually implement their own report.

Since 2020, the Ravine Strategy has achieved:
• 720 hectares of land managed for invasive species

The polite statement here is Hogwash; let me add, City crews do not know how to properly apply pesticide (as in effectively), and their achievements here aren't far from nil.

• 252 tonnes garbage and metal removed from 333 hectares of ravine land

Sure, that's nice, we were doing litter and dumping removal before.......but have we made any of the changes that would reduce it happening in the first place? (answer: No)

• 42 students engaged through paid employment and training and mentorship
programs
• 96 outdoor and virtual events for Ravine Days
• more than 6,200 participants in in-person and virtual City and partner events and
programs

Virtual events, meaning teaching people basic tree ID or bird Identification, that's swell, doesn't really improve the ravines any....

• $47.9 million from partners (committed and submitted applications) from the federal
and provincial governments

Not expended...........one project approved last spring, was meant to happen last year.................still waiting...

Ok.....backpatting addressed..........what's next?

Oh...this bit, LOL

In 2021, a pilot program was launched with Toronto Nature Stewards, following City
Council direction to use their Manual for Stewardship in Public Ravines and Natural
Areas as a model for unsupervised volunteerism in Toronto's ravines. Through the
development of key criteria for site selection, work activities, and health and safety
considerations, Toronto Nature Stewards delivered a successful program in its
inaugural year through the reporting of robust key performance indicators. At the time of
writing this report, PFR and TNS are planning for a significant expansion of the program
for the 2022 season.

For the record, the City has made this effort by volunteers as painful as possible, they won't allow any work by volunteers inside ESAs (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) which comprise a large chunk of the ravine system, reserving that work
to the City/TRCA who then proceed to do very little, mostly badly.

They also won't let the Nature Stewards plant anything............ pffft.


There's a great deal more blather..........

The only useful bit might be at attempt to attract philanthropic support, at scale for some initiatives........

*****

It amazes me that a department can so aptly demonstrate that it does know how to wisely use public funds; and that it can't even be bothered bragging about the projects it is implementing as this offends
their natural inclination to secrecy.
 
Last edited:
UT has a Front Page story up on a Ravine Strategy funding announcement.


A great deal of the announcement is regurgitation of previous commitments and six of the seven bullet points have nothing to do with ecological restoration or enhancement.

The majority being trail work (of which I approve); some erosion-management work, and way-finding signage.

Though they did manage to cluster six 'ecological projects' in one bullet point.

At least, I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt on that one for now; as I'm only aware of the details on the 'Cudmore' project with the others being more opaque. I will put in some queries and see if any of them amount
to anything interesting.
 
Some photos from the Cudmore Creek Wetland project. They recently did planting along the slope on Bayview.
IMG_5111.JPEG
IMG_5096.JPEG
IMG_5095.JPEG
IMG_5094.JPEG
 
Some photos from the Cudmore Creek Wetland project. They recently did planting along the slope on Bayview.
View attachment 569820View attachment 569818View attachment 569817View attachment 569816

Appreciate the photo update! Not a spot get to all that often, and if I do, I'm probably en route to the Brickworks and not paying attention to this.

***

Man alive has this project moved slowly, I read the initial concepts for it............ugh......before the pandemic.
 
Cudmore Creek wetland is almost complete. A lot of the fencing is down, and equipment is removed. It seems like the wetlands are done and just the lookouts and trail integration is left. There are some large stones set aside probably for this purpose.

The wetlands benefited from the recent storm, which the local frogs seem to be loving.

I'm very excited to get the trailhead back open and see how this all grows. I don't know much about planting, but it looks diverse to me.

On another note, I continued my ride up Taylor Massey last night but it was too dark for photos. The trails are all complete and open with new bridges. It's a spectacular system in there, one of the most beautiful spots in the city. The marshy area mentioned in another thread is looking extra wet however, so we will see what comes of the massive amount of trees planted.

Lastly, I passed 3 TRCA employees with two company cars parked on the lower Don Trail. They were observing bat boxes in lawn chairs and recording data. Is there anywhere online that references the bat box project with an explanation of the goal? I see lots of reference to bats and bat boxes, but not an overall plan. It is extensive throughout the Don and I imagine fairly low cost. That said I don't know enough about why it is so important.
Cudmore 1.jpg
Cudmore 2.jpg
Cudmore 3.jpg
Cudmore 4.jpg
Cudmore 5.jpg
Cudmore 6.jpg
Cudmore 7.jpg
Cudmore 8.jpg
 
Cudmore Creek wetland is almost complete. A lot of the fencing is down, and equipment is removed. It seems like the wetlands are done and just the lookouts and trail integration is left. There are some large stones set aside probably for this purpose.

The wetlands benefited from the recent storm, which the local frogs seem to be loving.

I'm very excited to get the trailhead back open and see how this all grows. I don't know much about planting, but it looks diverse to me.

On another note, I continued my ride up Taylor Massey last night but it was too dark for photos. The trails are all complete and open with new bridges. It's a spectacular system in there, one of the most beautiful spots in the city. The marshy area mentioned in another thread is looking extra wet however, so we will see what comes of the massive amount of trees planted.

Lastly, I passed 3 TRCA employees with two company cars parked on the lower Don Trail. They were observing bat boxes in lawn chairs and recording data. Is there anywhere online that references the bat box project with an explanation of the goal? I see lots of reference to bats and bat boxes, but not an overall plan. It is extensive throughout the Don and I imagine fairly low cost. That said I don't know enough about why it is so important.View attachment 579987View attachment 579988View attachment 579989View attachment 579990View attachment 579991View attachment 579992View attachment 579993View attachment 579994
See this on TRCA website https://trca.ca/conservation/environmental-monitoring/terrestrial-habitat-species/bat-detectives/
 
The most recent render image I have for the Cudmore Creek project is this one:

1720797269203.png


They're getting close to that, but definitely still some more work to do.
 
I've watched the concrete piles and footings be installed this spring. In the fall I spoke with a guy on site from the piling company who said they couldn't work once the frost set in. In any event, it got done and today they are installing the two lookouts. Very cool to see, hopefully it will be open soon!
Cudmore.jpg
 
Looks like this is almost ready to open. Pond has filled in, and piers are in, plus bridge to the biking trails. Also a new trail map hut. It looks like there is another set of metal piles on site for something to be constructed. Really looking forward to it being finished and open. It's a great trail head. Add in a small cafe with a good coffee and beer selection and I'll hang out by some hydro wires and railway tracks.
Cudmore 9.jpg
Cudmore 10.jpg
 
The Cudmore Creek Trailhead project is complete and open to the public. The wetland connections to the mountain bike trail entrance "Pottery Climb" and exit "Pottery Downhill". It a nice spot and a big upgrade from a defacto parking lot. If you do have to drive there you can park at Todmorden Mills and walk over. A few growing seasons and it will be beautiful. While slow to complete, it's nice to see it open.
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
 
Sean Micaleff wrote a piece for The Star recently looking at the state of Toronto's Ravines and had a few thoughts on some TLC for them.


From the above:

He broke his ideas down into Quick Fixes:

He suggests a trail auditor checking the state of Bike Paths daily for physical defects that might send a cyclist flying. (Paths should be better maintained, but this idea is a non-starter)

He also wants the pilot project signage introduced nearly a decade ago extended to the entire ravine system. A fine idea.......

and Serious Changes:

Fully fund the Ravine Strategy with a particular nod to tackling erosion.

Fully fund the completion of the Pan Am Path (this includes the Meadoway); there are segments of this underway, but some notable gaps in the lower Humber River area, as major crossings of railways and highways for the Meadoway segment.

Finally, Pie in the Sky:

1759065246184.png


Also a fine idea, but there is no chance of moving forward on most of it in the near term.

Best shot is the Don Valley Golf Course, there's real power backing that project.........so hopefully that one can get off the ground.

There are lot of other trail projects that may go ahead, but relatively few are in ravines. The Finch Hydro Corridor, Warden Hydro Corridor, Kipling/Etobicoke Hydro corridor all have momentum.

There is also a push for the GECO spur/subway alignment trail from Victoria Park Station to Kennedy Station.
 
Last edited:
Sean Micaleff wrote a piece for The Star recently looking at the state of Toronto's Ravines and had a few thoughts on some TLC for them.


From the above:

He broke his ideas down into Quick Fixes:

He suggests a trail auditor checking the state of Bike Paths daily for physical defects that might send a cyclist flying. (Paths should be better maintained, but this idea is a non-starter)

He also wants the pilot project signage introduced nearly a decade ago extended to the entire ravine system. A fine idea.......

and Serious Changes:

Fully fund the Ravine Strategy with a particular nod to tackling erosion.

Fully fund the completion of the Pan Am Path (this includes the Meadoway); there are segments of this underway, but some notable gaps in the lower Humber River area, as major crossings of railways and highways for the Meadoway segment.

Finally, Pie in the Sky:

View attachment 684325

Also a fine idea, but there is no chance of moving forward on most of it in the near term.

Best shot is the Don Valley Golf Course, there's real power backing that project.........so hopefully that one can get off the ground.

There are lot of other trail projects that may go ahead, but relatively few are in ravines. The Finch Hydro Corridor, Warden Hydro Corridor, Kipling/Etobicoke Hydro corridor all have momentum.

There is also a push for the GECO spur/subway alignment trail from Victoria Park Station to Kennedy Station.
Is there an organization, somewhat like the Bruce Trail Association, taking the idea of a ‘trail’ from Oak Ridges, through the Rouge Valley, and then through a series of ‘side’ trails building connections into more built up areas? If not, then there should be one. Enhancing the natural parkland, provincial forests, regional parks and connecting them through to the lake should be a regional, provincial and federal project of a high order,. I would add the existing Bruce Trail, I would add Brontë Creek as well, Humber Valleys.

It helps to have that umbrella private citizens group to fundraise, drive projects, recruit a membership base, and have the long term vision that exists long past current government mandates and life spans.
 
Is there an organization, somewhat like the Bruce Trail Association, taking the idea of a ‘trail’ from Oak Ridges, through the Rouge Valley, and then through a series of ‘side’ trails building connections into more built up areas? If not, then there should be one. Enhancing the natural parkland, provincial forests, regional parks and connecting them through to the lake should be a regional, provincial and federal project of a high order,. I would add the existing Bruce Trail, I would add Brontë Creek as well, Humber Valleys.

No.

Rouge National Park encompasses that entire territory, and it has a Trail Master Plan; but there is no third party NGO.

Parks Canada does the heavy lifting there (or not)

They have an official goal in the 2019 Management Plan to have trail from Lake Ontario to the Oak Ridges Moraine Trail

They aren't there yet......quite a few gaps to fill.

This is the current trail map:

1759617528987.png


The northmost boundary of the park is the Oak Ridges Moraine, The park comes very close to Goodwood Conservation Area which is a one of the spots the Oak Ridges Trail passes through.


This was the then concept plan for the trails at the north end:

1759618676408.png


To look at all the plans, go here:

https://parks.canada.ca/pn-np/on/rouge/info/gestion-management/gestion-management-2019 (the above is concept area 6)

Now, just to muddle things, everything at that end will be re-done...........the Park is seeing several thousand acres of Pickering Airport land added here.

Also, Uxbridge Provincial Park will be less than 3km away; and could be as large as Rouge is about to be ~20,000 acres.

A full connection between the two would reach the Environment Class Provincial Park standard with well over 40,000 acres.

Green Durham as a group is working as a stakeholder on the plans for Uxbridge.

They can be found here: https://greendurham.ca/

They're a pretty motivated lot and are pushing for a complete trail system here.

There's also Friends of the Rouge Watershed, but they are more restoration focused as opposed to trails:


It helps to have that umbrella private citizens group to fundraise, drive projects, recruit a membership base, and have the long term vision that exists long past current government mandates and life spans.

It does; though unlike Bruce, where the organization owns a considerable portion of the land, here it will be mostly in public ownership in one of the two Parks.
 
No.

Rouge National Park encompasses that entire territory, and it has a Trail Master Plan; but there is no third party NGO.

Parks Canada does the heavy lifting there (or not)

They have an official goal in the 2019 Management Plan to have trail from Lake Ontario to the Oak Ridges Moraine Trail

They aren't there yet......quite a few gaps to fill.

This is the current trail map:

View attachment 685735

The northmost boundary of the park is the Oak Ridges Moraine, The park comes very close to Goodwood Conservation Area which is a one of the spots the Oak Ridges Trail passes through.


This was the then concept plan for the trails at the north end:

View attachment 685736

To look at all the plans, go here:

https://parks.canada.ca/pn-np/on/rouge/info/gestion-management/gestion-management-2019 (the above is concept area 6)

Now, just to muddle things, everything at that end will be re-done...........the Park is seeing several thousand acres of Pickering Airport land added here.

Also, Uxbridge Provincial Park will be less than 3km away; and could be as large as Rouge is about to be ~20,000 acres.

A full connection between the two would reach the Environment Class Provincial Park standard with well over 40,000 acres.

Green Durham as a group is working as a stakeholder on the plans for Uxbridge.

They can be found here: https://greendurham.ca/

They're a pretty motivated lot and are pushing for a complete trail system here.

There's also Friends of the Rouge Watershed, but they are more restoration focused as opposed to trails:




It does; though unlike Bruce, where the organization owns a considerable portion of the land, here it will be mostly in public ownership in one of the two Parks.
Thanks for this. I will have a closer look when I return home.

The comparison with the Bruce is not totally fair as the Bruce had about a 50 year head start on the project. But I think a lot less ‘public’ land to begin with. But still, encouraging news on the Rouge, and to be commended.

I am always reluctant to endorse expropriation where functioning agricultural, industrial, commercial, residential and even recreational (golf for instance) uses are in place. (Who wants there land expropriated for a road allowance?). But given that, one also has to recognize a higher public purpose, whether that be transit or public trails. And where moral suasion cannot come into play, which the Bruce has used to good effect in many cases to gain agreement and access for the trail, then other means will need to be examined at some point, most possibly through the mechanism of parklands.

I have been thinking for some time that the Escarpment needs greater protections, especially from ‘estate’ housing, and an expansion of designated ‘park’ lands would help in this area As the urban and nearby populations continue to grow, access to recreation will as well. Growing the Bruce as a park is something that should not be overlooked, as is the Rouge, and our other watersheds. These all offer locations potential for continued development os areas of recreational use, as much as the waterfront along the lake holds.

And then we can talk about farmland trusts……

Thanks for your information.
 

Back
Top